openldap-bugs December 2021

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
121 discussions

[Issue 9751] New: Delta-MPR resolution too eager to drop attribute deletes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9751 Issue ID: 9751 Summary: Delta-MPR resolution too eager to drop attribute deletes Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review, replication Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- syncrepl_resolve_cb will completely drop an attribute delete (or the delete part of replace) if there's a "newer" (timestamp-wise) op touching the same attribute. This way servers processing the "out of order" write end up keeping values that should have been removed (and have been on those that received it in the natural order). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9770] New: slapo-constraint handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9770 Issue ID: 9770 Summary: slapo-constraint handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Just like ITS#9493. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9764] New: slapo-valsort handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9764 Issue ID: 9764 Summary: slapo-valsort handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Similar to ITS#9493. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9763] New: slapo-refint handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9763 Issue ID: 9763 Summary: slapo-refint handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Similar to ITS#9493. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9762] New: slapo-dyngroup handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9762 Issue ID: 9762 Summary: slapo-dyngroup handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Similar to ITS#9493. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9759] New: olcRetcodeItem doesn't implement ordered values correctly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9759 Issue ID: 9759 Summary: olcRetcodeItem doesn't implement ordered values correctly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- olcRetcodeItem is marked X-ORDERED 'VALUES' so it has to handle ordered inserts, which is currently not implemented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9756] New: syncprov_play_accesslog doesn't check minCSN properly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9756 Issue ID: 9756 Summary: syncprov_play_accesslog doesn't check minCSN properly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- When asked to replay the accesslog database for a refresh delete, syncprov doesn't interpret the minCSN data correctly, resulting in: - an inaccurate refresh if a purge removed some important data in the meantime - potentially a very expensive query when consumer is actually up to date w.r.t. to some sids in our contextCSN -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9752] New: Improperly normalized minCSN values in accesslog
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9752 Issue ID: 9752 Summary: Improperly normalized minCSN values in accesslog Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The CSN matching rules require normalized values to be provided. When normalized values are provided to attr_merge they must be distinct from the regular values. accesslog.c:1982 is providing the same berval in both regular and normalized value, which triggers an assert failure for this consistency check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9747] New: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Issue ID: 9747 Summary: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: henson(a)acm.org Target Milestone: --- Given the following group: dn: uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: cppGroup objectClass: posixGroup uid: unxadmin cn: Unix Administrators gidNumber: 17730 member: member: uid=gkuri,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu member: uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu memberUid: gkuri memberUid: henson and the following dynlist config: dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames ldap compare operations checking group membership fail erroneously: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu FALSE If the dynlist-attrset configuration is removed, the compare works as expected: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu TRUE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9749] New: logoldattr documentation is misleading
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 Issue ID: 9749 Summary: logoldattr documentation is misleading Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Reading the accesslog manpage, someone might expect that attributes specified in logoldattr would be logged regardless of whether the entry being modified matches any of the configured filters. This is not the case and should be clarified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs December 2021