openldap-bugs August 2020

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

2 participants
185 discussions

[Bug 9237] New: Remove back-perl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9237 Bug ID: 9237 Summary: Remove back-perl Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- For 2.5, we will be removing back perl. In master, remove the ability to build back perl, but keep the source for the 2.5 branch, remove the source as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 9236] New: Remove back-shell
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9236 Bug ID: 9236 Summary: Remove back-shell Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- For 2.5+ remove back-shell from being built. In master, keep the source code for now (Delete for 2.6+) For 2.5 branch, delete the source as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 9235] New: Stop building libldap
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9235 Bug ID: 9235 Summary: Stop building libldap Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- For 2.5+, we will no longer build libldap, only libldap_r Source should remain in the tree -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 9234] New: Disable back-sql with --enable-backends
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9234 Bug ID: 9234 Summary: Disable back-sql with --enable-backends Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Similar to what was done for back-ndb, disable back-sql building when --enable-backends is given -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9232] New: [PATCH] Implement caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9232 Bug ID: 9232 Summary: [PATCH] Implement caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: fredrik(a)roubert.name Target Milestone: --- As far as I've been able to figure out by searching the mailing list archives, the sole reason for this not being implemented yet is simply that no-one has cared to do it yet: https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200502/msg00232.html https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200605/msg00208.html Now I myself would like to use caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch on my own OpenLDAP server, so I've written this patch: https://roubert.name/fredrik/software/openldap/0001-Implement-caseIgnoreLis… Notice of Origin: The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Fredrik Roubert <fredrik(a)roubert.name>. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. Rights Statement: I, Fredrik Roubert, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 9226] New: MinGW build fails to link rewrite program with --enable-dynamic
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226 Bug ID: 9226 Summary: MinGW build fails to link rewrite program with --enable-dynamic Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ryan(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link cc -g -O2 -o rewrite rewrite.o parse.o librewrite.a ../../libraries/libldap_r/libldap_r.la ../../libraries/liblber/liblber.la ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a -lregex -lws2_32 libtool: link: cc -g -O2 -o .libs/rewrite rewrite.o parse.o librewrite.a ../../libraries/libldap_r/.libs/libldap_r.dll.a /home/ryan/openldap/libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.dll.a ../../libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.dll.a ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a -lregex -lws2_32 -L/mingw64/lib C:/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/9.3.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a(utils.o): in function `lutil_str2bin': C:\msys64\home\ryan\openldap\libraries\liblutil/utils.c:933: undefined reference to `__imp_ber_memfree_x' C:/msys64/mingw64/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/9.3.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: C:\msys64\home\ryan\openldap\libraries\liblutil/utils.c:887: undefined reference to `__imp_ber_memalloc_x' collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:292: rewrite] Error 1 I think this is caused by the order of libraries on the link line. MinGW's import libraries (.dll.a) behave like static libraries with one .o per function, so liblutil.a should come before liblber.dll.a. I guess it doesn't occur on UNIX because the shared libraries are scanned differently. It doesn't occur with static linking because entire objects are linked and liblber.a/memory.o is already pulled in by libldap. N.B.: RE24 with --enable-dynamic fails to link liblber; the error looks superficially similar but it is not the same. RE24's issue is a libtool bug, already fixed in master by upgrading libtool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9215] New: Embedded _XOPEN_SOURCE breaks Solaris build [regression]
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9215 Bug ID: 9215 Summary: Embedded _XOPEN_SOURCE breaks Solaris build [regression] Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- The commit [2020-03-26 57b7003 | thr_posix.c: fix implicit function declaration for 'pthread_setconcurrency'] introduced in the bug 8676, comment 8: > --- a/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c > +++ b/libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c > @@ -15,4 +15,6 @@ > */ > > +#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 /* For pthread_setconcurrency() on glibc */ > + > #include "portable.h" breaks build on Solaris (likely any version; irrelevant compiling options omitted): | cc ... -c ../../../libraries/libldap_r/thr_posix.c -o .libs/thr_posix.o | "/usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h", line 354: #error: "Compiler or options invalid for pre-UNIX 03 X/Open applications and pre-2001 POSIX applications" The system headers bear in mind: "If you are using c99-compatible compiler ..." and we all are using such compilers in 2020, isn't it? "... and want to use X/Open CAE, it must be at least Issue 6" i.e., not the Issue 5 (_XOPEN_SOURCE=500). This part of system headers came from the times when Solaris was Sun yet. Given the long respectful history of Sun's commitment to standard conformance, I trust this assertion. The problem, however, is not an incorrect X/Open version this patch employs. 1st of all, this patch is a system-specific hack, that targets not even GNU-based systems, but, I suppose, specifically, GNU linux, maybe, even specific version and distro. E.g., there are no problems with pthread_setconcurrency() visibility on Solaris. 2nd of all, the influence of configuration macros _XOPEN_SOURCE, _POSIX_SOURCE, _POSIX_C_SOURCE, _XOPEN_VERSION, _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED, __EXTENSIONS__ etc is very system- and compiler- specific, and embedding these macros directly in a source is likely to cause problems. I believe the best course of action is to put a test in autoconf to check what is the best way to achieve pthread_setconcurrency() visibility on any given system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 9213] New: undefined reference in back_ldap when --enable-ldap=mod and --disable-dynamic
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9213 Bug ID: 9213 Summary: undefined reference in back_ldap when --enable-ldap=mod and --disable-dynamic Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ryan(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- ./configure --enable-modules --enable-ldap=mod doesn't link back_ldap with libldap (--enable-dynamic is disabled per default). The resulting binary doesn't work; slapd has libldap statically linked, but doesn't include all the symbols back_ldap uses: specifically ldap_modify_ext. slaptest passes, but back_ldap fails at runtime (test022 fails). Not sure if other modules would have the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 9212] New: [2.5] entry_schema_check can leave text uninitialized
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9212 Bug ID: 9212 Summary: [2.5] entry_schema_check can leave text uninitialized Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ryan(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- 76df74dbeab47195e42946a474c3a5f8557c168d removed some important snprintfs in schema_check.c. Now we can get uninitialized data in *text for these cases. For example: $ ./clients/tools/ldapmodify -H ldap://:9000 -x -D cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com -w secret dn: cn=test,dc=example,dc=com changetype: add objectclass: device adding new entry "cn=test,dc=example,dc=com" dn: cn=test,dc=example,dc=com add: sn sn: test modifying entry "cn=test,dc=example,dc=com" ldap_modify: Object class violation (65) additional info: | $ ./clients/tools/ldapmodify -H ldap://:9000 -x -D cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com -w secret dn: cn=test,dc=example,dc=com add: sn sn: test modifying entry "cn=test,dc=example,dc=com" ldap_modify: Object class violation (65) additional info: ^[[?1;2c $ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 9209] New: test072/test075 fail on Solaris due to buggy test script
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Oct '20

14 Oct '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9209 Bug ID: 9209 Summary: test072/test075 fail on Solaris due to buggy test script Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Both test072 and test075 have this logic: if test -z `which dsadm`; then echo "DSEE dsadm not in path, test skipped" exit 0 fi This works fine on Linux, however it does not work on Solaris causing the test to execute (and then fail). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 24

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs August 2020