Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)symas.com> schrieb am
29.08.2019 um 15:41 in
Nachricht <2B407C076711C27AEF9EBD7E(a)[192.168.1.144]>:
>
> --On Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:32 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl
> <Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>
>>> I've seen this when an attribute is introduced into the cn=config
>>> database that's not part of the built‑in slapd schema. It can be
>>> harmless in that case.
>>
>> I grepped for the attribute in external schema files, but didn't find it.
>> As I found it when querying slapd, I conclude that the definition shown
>> above must be build into slapd.
>
> Using the power of the source, auditcontext is defined in the
> slapo-accesslog overlay.
Right,
found it there:
( 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.666.11.5.1.30 NAME 'auditContext' DESC 'DN of
auditContainer' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 SINGLE-VALUE
NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE dSAOperation )
But I did not find an object definition that uses that attribute (any more).
It is clearly an operational attribute.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp.
http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/project/