Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)symas.com> schrieb am
29.08.2019 um 15:41 in
> --On Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:32 AM +0200 Ulrich Windl
> <Ulrich.Windl(a)rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>> I've seen this when an attribute is introduced into the cn=config
>>> database that's not part of the built‑in slapd schema. It can be
>>> harmless in that case.
>> I grepped for the attribute in external schema files, but didn't find it.
>> As I found it when querying slapd, I conclude that the definition shown
>> above must be build into slapd.
> Using the power of the source, auditcontext is defined in the
> slapo-accesslog overlay.
found it there:
( 184.108.40.206.4.1.4203.6220.127.116.11.30 NAME 'auditContext' DESC 'DN of
auditContainer' SYNTAX 18.104.22.168.4.1.1422.214.171.124.12 SINGLE-VALUE
NO-USER-MODIFICATION USAGE dSAOperation )
But I did not find an object definition that uses that attribute (any more).
It is clearly an operational attribute.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/