openldap-technical May 2025

openldap-technical@openldap.org

17 participants
25 discussions

Removing AutoCA overlay, objectClass, etc
by Brendan Kearney 06 Nov '25

06 Nov '25

list members, i have a multi-provider footprint that i want to remove the AutoCA functionality from. when i loaded the overlay, i set it to disabled, per the below: dn: olcOverlay={5}autoca objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcAutoCAConfig objectClass: top olcOverlay: {5}autoca structuralObjectClass: olcAutoCAConfig entryUUID: 739501f2-49ad-103e-911a-3dc9b40470bf creatorsName: uid=brendan,ou=domainusers,ou=users,dc=bpk2,dc=com createTimestamp: 20240117175614Z olcAutoCADays: 3650 olcAutoCAKeybits: 2048 olcDisabled: TRUE olcAutoCAserverKeybits: 2048 olcAutoCAuserClass: inetOrgPerson olcAutoCAserverClass: device olcAutoCAserverDays: 1826 olcAutoCAuserDays: 365 olcAutoCAuserKeybits: 2048 entryCSN: 20240117192443.210024Z#000000#001#000000 modifiersName: uid=brendan,ou=domainusers,ou=users,dc=bpk2,dc=com modifyTimestamp: 20240117192443Z note, olcDisabled is set to true. it seems that something went awry and even though i didn't want the capability active, i wound up with some caCertificate and caPrivateKey objects created in the DIT. it looks like i may have added the overlay in an active state and disabled it after the caCertificate/PrivateKey objects were created. i want to clean up things and remove the AutoCA pieces until i can test them better. what process is needed to remove the objects and overlay, as replication may play a part in some of the effort? i could imagine that deleting the caCertificate and caPrivateKey objects would be relatively straight forward, but the overlay may prove a bit more complicated. i found a message on this list from some time ago, https://www.openldap.com/lists/openldap-technical/201811/msg00075.html, that says i can stop the slapd instance, remove the overlay ldif files and restart the instance, to accomplish this task. the issue that i am trying to avoid is having to take down the entire fully replicated DIT, in order to delete the overlay and not have replication recreate it because one active node "didn't get the memo". are there any insights into how i can delete overlays without having replication recreate the objects i want to remove, all while still providing at least one instance to service requests? if it clarifies things, i am running 3 slapd instances behind a load balancer and both the config DB and DIT are replicated between all nodes. if it comes to it, i could take down all instances to perform this work, but i would like to avoid it if possible. thanks in advance, brendan kearney

3 9

Multiple memberOf overlays
by John C. Pfeifer 06 Aug '25

06 Aug '25

I am in the process of converting an existing LDAP infrastructure to OpenLDAP. I have a case where it would be convenient for two different objectClasses to map into the memberOf attribute. Is it possible to define two overlay configs or will they end up fighting each other over the memberOf attribute? For instance: dn: olcOverlay={5}memberofA,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcMemberOf olcOverlay: {5}memberofA olcMemberOfDangling: error olcMemberOfRefInt: FALSE olcMemberOfGroupOC: objectClassA olcMemberOfMemberAD: member olcMemberOfMemberOfAD: memberOf dn: olcOverlay={6}memberofB,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcMemberOf olcOverlay: {6}memberofB olcMemberOfDangling: error olcMemberOfRefInt: FALSE olcMemberOfGroupOC: objectClassB olcMemberOfMemberAD: member olcMemberOfMemberOfAD: memberOf // John Pfeifer Division of Information Technology University of Maryland, College Park

4 3

openldap-technical return-exact-case is set to "on"
by JM Lacombe 17 Jul '25

17 Jul '25

openldap to the "openldap-technical" mailing list openldap-technical(a)openldap.org hello like on SUN (odsee) : set config nsslapd-return-exact-case is set to "on" or off with openldap v2.6.6.3, how to get same feature ? and force return entryDN to lower case. best regards JM Lacombe email: jmlacombe(a)hotmail.com

3 6

delta-syncrepl experience with OpenLDAP 2.5 (from SLES15)
by Windl, Ulrich 26 Jun '25

26 Jun '25

Hi! When upgrading from OpenLDAP 2.4 (SLES12) to OpenLDAP 2.5 (SLES15) I gave delta-syncrepl a try. That was a hard way in several aspects. Meanwhile I think I understand most of the details (docs could be much better IMHO). Where delta-syncrepl has big problems is when sync has been set up, but one database is reloaded and some UUIDs are newly created for entries that exist on the other server(s). Somehow slapd detects that problem and claims that a “content sync” is required, but after some time it seems to start a refresh anyway. When I did the content load on the other server, slapd quit with a core dump. Unfortunately I had quite a lot of core dumps during my testing. So I feel delta-syncrepl is not as solid as it should be (in the version provided with SLES15 SP6). Some of the logs: May 27 13:37:05 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep1: rid=105 starting refresh (sending cookie=rid=105,sid=006,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.074592Z#000000#001#0> May 27 13:37:05 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep2: rid=105 LDAP_RES_SEARCH_RESULT May 27 13:37:05 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep2: rid=105 delta-sync lost sync, switching to REFRESH May 27 13:37:05 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep2: rid=105 (4096) Content Sync Refresh Required May 27 13:41:36 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep1: rid=105 starting refresh (sending cookie=rid=105,sid=006,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.074592Z#000000#001#0> May 27 13:41:36 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrep2: rid=105 LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE - SYNC_ID_SET May 27 13:41:36 v06 slapd[27194]: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=105 DN: cn=config, UUID: 85353d82-cf3a-103f-9d14-755ae58f92b6 May 27 13:41:36 v06 slapd[27194]: syncrepl_entry: rid=105 LDAP_RES_SEARCH_ENTRY(LDAP_SYNC_ADD) csn=(none) tid 0x7f6b1b7fe6c0 … May 27 13:43:33 v06 slapd[27194]: do_syncrepl: rid=105 rc -1 retrying (4 retries left) May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1008 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=106,sid=005,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.0> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1008 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1008 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1008 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1008 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=116,sid=005,csn=20130719093756.074776Z#000000#000#000000;20250217105250.3> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_op_search: no change, skipping log replay May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_op_search: nothing changed, finishing up initial search early May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1009 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1011 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=106,sid=005,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.0> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1011 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1011 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1011 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1011 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=116,sid=005,csn=20130719093756.074776Z#000000#000#000000;20250217105250.3> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_op_search: no change, skipping log replay May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_op_search: nothing changed, finishing up initial search early May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1010 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=116,sid=005,csn=20130719093756.074776Z#000000#000#000000;20250217105250.3> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_op_search: no change, skipping log replay May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_op_search: nothing changed, finishing up initial search early May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1012 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1013 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=106,sid=005,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.0> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1013 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1013 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1013 op=2 syncprov_sendinfo: refreshDelete cookie= May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1013 op=2 syncprov_search_response: detaching op May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1014 op=2 syncprov_op_search: got a persistent search with a cookie=rid=106,sid=005,csn=20130708113956.028116Z#000000#000#000000;20240708090039.0> May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1014 op=2 syncprov_findbase: searching May 27 13:43:34 v06 slapd[27194]: conn=1014 op=2 syncprov_op_search: registered persistent search May 27 13:43:34 v06 systemd[1]: Started Process Core Dump (PID 27241/UID 0). May 27 13:43:35 v06 systemd-coredump[27242]: [🡕] Process 27194 (slapd) of user 76 dumped core. Stack trace of thread 27199: #0 0x00007f6b34ca8dfc __pthread_kill_implementation (libc.so.6 + 0xa8dfc) #1 0x00007f6b34c57842 raise (libc.so.6 + 0x57842) #2 0x00007f6b34c3f5cf abort (libc.so.6 + 0x3f5cf) #3 0x00007f6b34c3f4e7 __assert_fail_base.cold (libc.so.6 + 0x3f4e7) #4 0x00007f6b34c4fb32 __assert_fail (libc.so.6 + 0x4fb32) #5 0x00007f6b34787258 n/a (syncprov.so + 0xc258) #6 0x000055765d7e04f3 overlay_op_walk (slapd + 0xb74f3) #7 0x000055765d7e06be n/a (slapd + 0xb76be) #8 0x000055765d76ee54 fe_op_search (slapd + 0x45e54) #9 0x000055765d76e726 do_search (slapd + 0x45726) #10 0x000055765d76c18f n/a (slapd + 0x4318f) #11 0x000055765d76c98d n/a (slapd + 0x4398d) #12 0x00007f6b34ff7da0 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48da0) #13 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #14 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27194: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca8b83 __pthread_clockjoin_ex (libc.so.6 + 0xa8b83) #2 0x000055765d7691ca slapd_daemon (slapd + 0x401ca) #3 0x000055765d74c88e main (slapd + 0x2388e) #4 0x00007f6b34c40e6c __libc_start_call_main (libc.so.6 + 0x40e6c) #5 0x00007f6b34c40f35 __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (libc.so.6 + 0x40f35) #6 0x000055765d74c90a _start (slapd + 0x2390a) Stack trace of thread 27204: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27198: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27197: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27202: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27200: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27203: #0 0x00007f6b34ca3c1e __futex_abstimed_wait_common (libc.so.6 + 0xa3c1e) #1 0x00007f6b34ca6548 pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 (libc.so.6 + 0xa6548) #2 0x00007f6b34ff7e40 n/a (libldap-2.5.releng.so.0 + 0x48e40) #3 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #4 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) Stack trace of thread 27196: #0 0x00007f6b34d2e796 epoll_wait (libc.so.6 + 0x12e796) #1 0x000055765d76607b n/a (slapd + 0x3d07b) #2 0x00007f6b34ca6f6c start_thread (libc.so.6 + 0xa6f6c) #3 0x00007f6b34d2e338 __clone3 (libc.so.6 + 0x12e338) ELF object binary architecture: AMD x86-64 May 27 13:43:35 v06 systemd[1]: systemd-coredump(a)5-27241-0.service: Deactivated successfully. Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

2 3

MDB monitoring: How many free pages actually?
by Windl, Ulrich 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

Hi, Considering this monitoring information, I wonder: olmMDBPagesMax: 12800 olmMDBPagesUsed: 9229 olmMDBPagesFree: 3810 Is the number of actual free pages 12800 - 9229 + 3810, i.e. "unallocated (12800 - 9229)" plus "usable" (3810)? How many free pages are needed before updates stop working? Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

3 5

Translucent/back_ldap and controls
by Bergmann, Clemens 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

Hi, we currently configuring openLDAP with translucent overlay to put in front of some legacy non-openLDAP LDAP servers. The translucent configuration is as follows: dn: olcOverlay={3}translucent,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcConfig objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcTranslucentConfig objectClass: top olcOverlay: {3}translucent olcDisabled: FALSE olcTranslucentBindLocal: TRUE dn: olcDatabase={0}ldap,olcOverlay={3}translucent,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcConfig objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcLDAPConfig objectClass: olcTranslucentDatabase objectClass: top olcDatabase: {0}ldap olcDbACLBind: bindmethod=simple binddn=cn=hidden credentials=secret tls_cacert=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt olcDbStartTLS: ldaps tls_cacert=/etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt olcDbURI: ldaps://legacy-ldap-sever/ olcDbUseTemporaryConn: TRUE Searching via ldapsearch and apache directory studio works fine. When testing with some other clients we got empty results. Looking into the requests with trace debugLevel we see that some of the clients use different controls in the requests. One of the clients used paging and only got some of the entries back. We could prevent this behavior by filtering the value from the rootDSE by adding the following olcAccess ‘{1}to dn.base="" attrs=supportedControl val/objectIdentifierMatch=1.2.840.113556.1.4.319 by * none’. This “fixed” the problem for this client. Another client seems to use the manageDSAIT (2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2) control. That seems to receive empty results. We can reproduce the results by adding ‘-E "2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.2"’ to the ldapsearch command. This will also result in an empty result. Unfortunately filtering the control in the same way did not work neither for ldapsearch nor for the other client. Had someone seen this seeming incompatibility of back_ldap with some or all controls. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Clemens (Bergmann) -- Clemens Bergmann [er/ihm; he/him] Gruppe Nutzermanagement und Entwicklung Technische Universität Darmstadt Hochschulrechenzentrum, Alexanderstraße 2, 64283 Darmstadt Tel. +49 6151 16 71184 <http://www.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de/> http://www.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de/

3 3

olcPPolicyForwardUpdates not working
by Benjamin Renard 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

Hello, I have problem with the olcPPolicyForwardUpdates option that seem not working : On master and slave, I configured Ppolicy with pwdLockout. When I try to connect on master with a bad password, the pwdFailureTime attribute of the entry is successfully updated, but not if I do the same on the slave. On slave, my ppolicy configuration is exactly the same as on master but I add olcPPolicyForwardUpdates=TRUE. I also configured the chain overlay and the updateref parameter on the database. Extract of my slave configuration : olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config [...] olcSyncrepl: [...] olcUpdateRef: ldaps://ldap-master olcOverlay={0}chain,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcChainConfig objectClass: top olcOverlay: {0}chain olcChainReturnError: TRUE olcDatabase={0}ldap,olcOverlay={0}chain,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcLDAPConfig objectClass: olcChainDatabase objectClass: top olcDatabase: {0}ldap olcDbURI: ldaps://ldap-master olcDbIDAssertBind: bindmethod=simple binddn="[same user used in olcSyncrepl of the database]" credentials="secret" mode=self olcDbRebindAsUser: TRUE olcOverlay={1}ppolicy,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcPPolicyConfig objectClass: top olcOverlay: {1}ppolicy olcPPolicyHashCleartext: TRUE olcPPolicyUseLockout: TRUE olcPPolicyForwardUpdates: TRUE Do you have any idea of what I doing wrong ? Thanks, -- Benjamin Renard - Easter-eggs 44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37 - mailto:brenard@easter-eggs.com

3 20

using refint overlay for pwdPolicySubentry
by Windl, Ulrich 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

Hi! Some time ago U had replaced a password policy, and it was quite sme work to replace all occurrences. So I thought reint cul help. I configured: dn: olcOverlay={4}refint,olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcRefintConfig olcRefintAttribute: member olcRefintAttribute: pwdPolicySubentry olcOverlay: {4}refint And I did apply a test rename of the policy used by many users. I got no error from the modify, but slapd said many times: slapd[28826]: ppolicy_get: policy subentry cn=pp-default-2024-05x,...,dc=de missing or invalid at 'pwdPolicySubentry', no policy will be applied! Shouldn't refint have fixed those entries, or is there something special about password policy? The other thing I had noticed was that the MMR consumer did not complain at all, and it even looks as if the update wasn't sent. Did anybody try this before? When I checked for the member attribute by deleting a user, all members containing that user were removed, however. I see "modifiersName: cn=Referential Integrity Overlay", too. Same is true for a rename. Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

2 13

Q: lastbind, pwdLastSuccess, and authTimestamp
by Windl, Ulrich 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

Hi! Slapd-config states that pwdLastSuccess (provided by slapd) will be set if olcLastBind is set to true. However to do that the lastbind module/overlay is needed. But the latter sets authTimestamp. Slapo-policy documents that authTimestamp (provided by lastbind module) is set when lastbind is enabled. At it seems pwdLastSuccess and authTimestamp are set to the same value. Can someone explain the logic behind? I'm confused; do I really need the lastbind overlay? I'm using OpenLDAP 2.5.X Kind regards, Ulrich Windl

3 7

back-sock module: error "socket connect(<socket_file_name>) failed"
by Gianluca Ramunno 31 May '25

31 May '25

Hello all, I'm a newbie in LDAP/OpenLDAP. I have to implement an LDAP proxy that "simply" authenticates a user against a first LDAP server and, if it fails for invalid credentials, tries to authenticate against a second LDAP server. I've found OpenLDAP and the back-sock backend as a possible way to implement such a scheme, using a python script as a concurrent server listening on the UNIX socket that will be used by the backend back-sock. I'm currently using Ubuntu 22.04 and OpenLDAP 2.5.19 for testing. Now I have a concurrent server in python that works well: it accepts a connection on a UNIX socket, prints what it receives over the connection and closes it. I tested it with a simple python client. On the OpenLDAP side, instead, I have a big issue: I tried to configure the backend using the legacy mode (the slapd.conf config file will follow), but when I try to run the command ldapwhoami -x -D "cn=admin,dc=example,dc=com" -W -H ldap://localhost (with "dc=example,dc=com" replaced with the base DN I used in the configuration during the installation phase) on the same machine where slapd is running, the command returns: ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49) using the right password input during installation phase, while on the server side in the log I found the error message: socket connect(<socket_file_name>) failed and the server python does not give any sign of accepting a connection. Setting the loglevel to -1 or starting slapd with strace ( strace slapd -d -1 ) does not provide further information. NOTE that the above ldapwhoami command worked fine with the original configuration with the new method in the slapd.d folder. This is the config file I created to use the back-sock backend: modulepath /usr/lib/ldap moduleload back_sock.la include /etc/ldap/schema/core.schema pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args #loglevel 256 loglevel -1 database sock socketpath /tmp/ldsock suffix "dc=proxy,dc=ldap" Any clue? Thanks in advance Gianluca Ramunno

1 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

openldap-technical May 2025