iNetOrgPerson doesn't exist?
by Luca Stancapiano
Hi all, I'm triing to create a user with openldap 2.4
dn: uid=rrrrrr,ou=users,dc=my-domain,dc=com
objectClass: iNetOrgPerson
uid: iiiiii
but it doesn't seem recognize the objectClass producing this error:
adding new entry "uid=rrrrrr,ou=users,dc=my-domain,dc=com"
ldap_add: Invalid syntax (21)
additional info: objectClass: value #0 invalid per syntax
Using other object classes is ok. What's the problem?
4 months, 2 weeks
dynlist few question (memberof replacement, reverse searches)
by Michal Soltys
Hi,
Few questions regarding dynlist as a replacement of memberof overlay.
Version: 2.5.13+dfsg-2~bpo11+1 on debian bullseye
1) in relatively simple environment (2 servers, multiprovider, syncrepl
and keepalived) we've been using memberof overlay - with memberOf
explicitly filtered out in syncrepl configuration (exattrs=memberOf).
This has been working fine so far across many versions - but considering
the warning in slapo-memberof manpage is this overlay used in this
fashion safe or are there other issues that eventually might show up ?
2) I've been experimenting a bit with dynlist as a replacement; judging
from examples/manual it seems it was primarily created to populate a
dynamic group while doing the search over users under a constraint of a
filter; but it seems it's working just fine in reverse way as well, e.g.
consider:
dynlist config: olcDynListAttrSet = toukPerson labeledURI dgMemberOf
group with manually added members: cn=ADM,ou=TouK,ou=Group,dc=touk,dc=pl
a user: uniqueMember=cn=Michał Sołtys,ou=Touki,ou=People,dc=touk,dc=pl
and relevant attributes in user's entry:
objectClass = toukPerson
labeledURI =
ldap:///ou=TouK,ou=Group,dc=touk,dc=pl??sub?(uniqueMember=cn=Michał
Sołtys,ou=Touki,ou=People,dc=touk,dc=pl)
This seems to be doing what we are expecting - populating dynamically
dgMemberOf with the groups the user has membership in. While this is
working, is it ok to use this overlay in this fashion (search over
groups instead of over users) ?
3) my last question is more of a curiosity - what case scenario are for
additional [+<memberOf-ad>[@<static-oc>[*]]] attributes ? No matter what
I tried in what way, neither +memberOf-ad nor +static-oc had any effect
whatsoever.
7 months
ch_malloc of 0 bytes failed on Meta backend
by sumanbadra＠gmail.com
Hi,
We have been using Meta backend with multiple AD domain controllers as targets. OpenLDAP version is 2.4.56 and installed on RHEL 8.6 Azure hosted servers. We have two such nodes with the same setup.
I have been trying to find the root cause for the error "ch_malloc of 0 bytes failed on Meta backend" found on the two servers. Service was crashed on both servers after this error. After starting the OpenLDAP service, it has been working fine so far.
My observations so far:
- Our Azure team did not find any abnormalities on the servers w.r.t the memory utilisation by LDAP during the incident.
- Stats around the time when issue occurred
sar -r
kbmemfree kbavail kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached kbcommit %commit kbactive kbinact kbdirty
01:50:01 PM 25202860 29022816 7519888 22.98 13808 5385664 4736872 14.48 2349572 4157132 64
02:00:01 PM 25195656 29018052 7527092 23.00 13808 5388120 4767748 14.57 2349572 4163232 44
02:10:00 PM 25197340 29010572 7525408 23.00 13808 5386752 4783920 14.62 2352524 4158856 3336
02:20:01 PM 25201220 29016192 7521528 22.99 13808 5388296 4789868 14.64 2352516 4154632 52
02:30:01 PM 25196500 29013836 7526248 23.00 13808 5390708 4789412 14.64 2352516 4159140 36
02:40:01 PM 25181840 29002912 7540908 23.04 13808 5402364 4782228 14.61 2352528 4173032 144
02:50:01 PM 25170748 28994608 7552000 23.08 13808 5413236 4758840 14.54 2352516 4185172 1092
03:00:01 PM 25172224 28997852 7550524 23.07 13808 5414920 4729152 14.45 2352520 4182356 48
03:10:01 PM 24976028 28806984 7746720 23.67 13808 5428036 5007976 15.30 2353012 4375608 4940
- We did not set any cache specifically as meta does not store any data
- Error shows 0 bytes rather than any specific number
I would really appreciate if you can share any pointer which would help dig further.
Thank you,
Suman
7 months
lmdb partial update of existing records
by g.fanini＠gmail.com
What is the recommended way to update partial substrings of existing records in lmdb ?
I could not find a way that allows to transfer not the entire record, thus wasting memory bandwidth, but only say overwrite a single byte within say a 1 mbyte record, is it acceptable/safe to modify :
mdb_put(offset, partial_len)
mdb_cursor_put(offset, partial_len)
...
if (F_ISSET(flags, MDB_RESERVE))
data->mv_data = olddata.mv_data;
else if (!(mc->mc_flags & C_SUB)) {
if(!offset && !partial_len)
memcpy(olddata.mv_data, data->mv_data, data->mv_size);
else
memcpy((char*)olddata.mv_data+offset, data->mv_data, partial_len);// allow partial update within existing record at offset
}
else {
memcpy(NODEKEY(leaf), key->mv_data, key->mv_size);
goto fix_parent;
}
...
further to that, is it possible to allow retrieving current record size, data with MDB_RESERVE, and what should be done if anything in case one opts not to write anything into the returned data
} else if ((data->mv_size == olddata.mv_size) || F_ISSET(flags, MDB_RESERVE) )// allow retrieving current record size, data with MDB_RESERVE
{
/* same size, just replace it. Note that we could
* also reuse this node if the new data is smaller,
* but instead we opt to shrink the node in that case.
*/
if (F_ISSET(flags, MDB_RESERVE))
{
if (!data->mv_size)
*data = olddata;// allow retrieving current size, data with MDB_RESERVE by querying with size 0
else
data->mv_data = olddata.mv_data;
}
7 months
dynlist modul pageresult bug
by Andreas Ladanyi
Hi,
is the pageresult issue of dynlist solved in the new 2.5.14 release of
slapd or will it be solved in the near future ?
cheers,
Andi
7 months
Content Sync Refresh Required
by Geert Hendrickx
Hi
We're on OpenLDAP 2.5.14, built from source on EL 8.
After dropping the accesslog on an MMR master, we keep seeing on all
replica's:
> do_syncrep2: rid=xxx (4096) Content Sync Refresh Required
and all replica's keep falling back to refresh mode every few minutes.
It's strange because we do this more often (typically after batch updates,
which leaves a large freelist in the accesslog upon pruning), but it's the
first time we hit this issue. We stopped the master (at a time no updates
are coming in), drop the accesslog, and start it again.
Does it make sense to wait until this fixes itself? Or should I fix this
manually somehow? I already tried mdb_copying the provider db to the
replica's, but the same thing keeps happening. In the meantime replication
is working very slowly...
Geert
7 months
META Ldap
by bourguijl＠gmail.com
Dears,
I've created a META configuration pointing to another backend ldap for which I'd like to use a generic user which will be used as unique user to fetch datas in backend requested by all users coming from the META proxy frontend.
I did following dynamic configuration :
dn: olcDatabase={2}meta
objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig
objectClass: olcMetaConfig
olcDatabase: {2}meta
olcSuffix: o=mobistar.be
olcAddContentAcl: FALSE
olcLastBind: TRUE
olcReadOnly: FALSE
olcRootDN: cn=directory manager,o=mobistar.be
olcRootPW: secret
olcSyncUseSubentry: FALSE
olcMonitoring: FALSE
olcDbOnErr: continue
olcDbPseudoRootBindDefer: TRUE
olcDbSingleConn: FALSE
olcDbUseTemporaryConn: FALSE
olcDbConnectionPoolMax: 16
olcDbBindTimeout: 1000000
olcDbCancel: abandon
olcDbChaseReferrals: FALSE
olcDbNoRefs: FALSE
olcDbNoUndefFilter: FALSE
olcDbProtocolVersion: 3
olcDbRebindAsUser: FALSE
olcDbSessionTrackingRequest: FALSE
olcDbTFSupport: no
structuralObjectClass: olcMetaConfig
entryUUID: c113f986-35b0-103d-9f4f-85924223dda7
creatorsName: cn=config
createTimestamp: 20230131124432Z
olcMaxDerefDepth: 15
olcDbNretries: 100
olcLastMod: FALSE
entryCSN: 20230227112001.500938Z#000000#001#000000
modifiersName: cn=manager,cn=config
modifyTimestamp: 20230227112001Z
dn: olcMetaSub={0}uri
objectClass: olcMetaTargetConfig
olcMetaSub: {0}uri
olcDbKeepalive: 0:0:0
olcDbTcpUserTimeout: 0
olcDbCancel: abandon
olcDbChaseReferrals: FALSE
olcDbNoRefs: FALSE
olcDbNoUndefFilter: FALSE
olcDbNretries: 100
olcDbProtocolVersion: 3
olcDbRebindAsUser: FALSE
olcDbSessionTrackingRequest: FALSE
olcDbTFSupport: no
structuralObjectClass: olcMetaTargetConfig
entryUUID: c113fc9c-35b0-103d-9f50-85924223dda7
creatorsName: cn=config
createTimestamp: 20230131124432Z
olcDbBindTimeout: 1000000
olcDbURI: "ldap://accmasterldapcorp.nonprod.priv.orange.be:389/o=mobistar.be
olcDbIDAssertBind: mode=self flags=non-prescriptive,proxy-authz-non-critical b
indmethod=simple timeout=0 network-timeout=0 binddn="uid=ldapproxyuser_acc,ou
=test,ou=system,o=mobistar.be" credentials="secret" keepalive=0:0:0 tc
p-user-timeout=0
entryCSN: 20230227142538.253522Z#000000#001#000000
modifiersName: cn=manager,cn=config
modifyTimestamp: 20230227142538Z
But when I do a ldapsearch with a user known in the backend from the META, it'll not take the olcDbIDAssertBind and it didn't found nothing.
If I do the same request directly on the backend, I get what I'm searching for.
Can you help me by giving me some advice about what I'm missing or what's erroneous ?
Thx in advance,
Jean_luc.
7 months
dynlist dont deliver memberof attribute
by Andreas Ladanyi
Hi,
iam using one 2.5 Master / Provider / syncprov and some 2.5 Slaves /
Consumers / syncrepl. I added the dynlist to generate memberOf attribute
to slapd.conf on Master and all Slaves.
Problem is only on some slaves the dynlist doesnt generate memberof
attribute output when ldapsearch to a user. Iam using the objectClass
labeledURIObject and attribute labeledURI to store the LDAP URI for
dynlist to trigger / generate the DN of group membership for memberof
attribute of the user. The labeledURI attribute is replicated successfully.
User entry output on non working slaves with attribute labeledURI,
memberof is missing:
ldapsearch -x -LLL -ZZ -H ldap://non_working_slave -b
'ou=X,dc=department,dc=organization,dc=X,dc=X' '(&(uid=X))' results in
the user entry with all objectClasses and all attributes except the
memberof attribute.
#start snip:
...
objectClass: labeledURIObject
...
labeledURI:
ldap:///dc=department,dc=organization,dc=X,dc=X??sub?(&(objectClass=groupOfNames)(member=uid=XXXX,ou=account,ou=X,dc=department,dc=organization,dc=X,dc=X))
#stop snip
slapd.conf:
overlay dynlist
dynlist-attrset labeledURIObject labeledURI memberOf
The difference between working and non working slaves is the length of
ACL list.
The important ACL entry is:
access to dn.sub=dc=department,dc=organization,dc=X,dc=X \
attrs=entry
by peername=IP_subnet read
by * break
access to
dn.regex=^[^,]+,ou=(account|group|groupOfNames),ou=X,dc=department,dc=organization,dc=X,dc=X$
by peername=IP_subnet read
by * break
i set no attrs= parameter at "access to dn.regex" rule to output all
attributes.
cheers,
Andreas
7 months
ACL issue
by eric.innocente＠univ-avignon.fr
Hi,
Using OpenLDAP 2.4 and this ACL :
=====
olcAccess: {0}to *
by dn="cn=admin,ou=ldap,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr" write
by * break
olcAccess: {1}to attrs=userPassword
by self write
by anonymous auth
by * none
olcAccess: {2}to attrs=myAttribute
by dn="cn=myUser,ou=ldap,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr" read
by * none
olcAccess: {3}to *
by * read
=====
in the aim (rule {2}) to grant read access to attribute 'myAttribute' for myUser and no other user (except admin).
As wanted, [R1] with authentified user myUser :
[R1] ldapsearch -x -LLL -h <myLDAP> -b 'ou=people,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr' -D 'cn=myUser,ou=ldap,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr' -w <secret> "(uid=someUid)" myAttribute
give me the dn and the required "myAttribute" :
dn: uid=someUid,ou=people,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr
myAttribute: <attribute value>
and [R2] with another authentified user :
[R2] ldapsearch -x -LLL -h <myLDAP> -b 'ou=people,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr' -D 'cn=anotherUser,ou=ldap,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr' -w <secret> "(uid=someUid)" myAttribute
does NOT give me the required "myAttribute", only the dn :
dn: uid=someUid,ou=people,dc=univ-avignon,dc=fr
BUT by replacing "read" by "none" in rule {3}, I get an error "No such object (32)" with either [R1] and [R2].
Since rule {3} should not be evaluated after matching rule {2}, I don't understand why modifying rule {3} modifies the behaviour.
And by replacing "read" by "search" in rule {3}, I no longer get an error, but I do NOT obtain the required "myAttribute" and nor the dn, with neither [R1] nor [R2].
Does it mean that "read" in rule {3} was necessary to read the dn ? And that without reading the dn, rule {2} cannot be evaluated ?
Please, help me !
Eric
7 months, 1 week
Using Ppolicy in a provider peer cluster can trigger consumer refresh condition
by James Rawlins
Hi there,
My ldap consists of a cluster of 3 providers that all replicate to each
other, and a fleet of consumers replicating from them, and we have ppolicy
installed on our providers and consumers both, though we're currently not
using it to enforce any particular policies automatically.
I've recently discovered a situation where a script could fail to login
with a non-rootDN service account to all three provider instances in short
order. The providers seem to be able to figure things out quickly, but the
consumers sometimes detect some ContextCSN inconsistency and when this
happens consumers to enter a REFRESH state caused by updates to the
operational attributes on the service account's dn entry in all three
providers at nearly the same time. In production this can cause latency due
to the extra CPU and network traffic of refreshing all consumers at once.
The only relevant documentation I've been able to find for this use case
are from https://linux.die.net/man/5/slapo-ppolicy:
Note that the current IETF Password Policy proposal does not define how
these operational attributes are expected to behave in a replication
environment. In general, authentication attempts on a slave server only
affect the copy of the operational attributes on that slave and will not
affect any attributes for a user's entry on the master server. Operational
attribute changes resulting from authentication attempts on a master server
will usually replicate to the slaves (and also overwrite any changes that
originated on the slave). These behaviors are not guaranteed and are
subject to change when a formal specification emerges.
And the related ability for consumers to send updates up a replication
chain using the chain overlay:
ppolicy_forward_updates Specify that policy state changes that result from
Bind operations (such as recording failures, lockout, etc.) on a consumer
should be forwarded to a master instead of being written directly into the
consumer's local database. This setting is only useful on a replication
consumer, and also requires the updateref setting and chain overlay to be
appropriately configured.
tl;dr Ppolicy wrote operational attributes to a service account's dn to all
of my provider instances at the same time when my SA used the wrong
password to login to them all at once, and caused all my consumers to
refresh at the same time. My question is: is the ppolicy overlay inherently
unsafe for a provider cluster? Right now I'm considering these options to
get rid of the risk of accidentally triggering a consumer REFRESH again:
- Remove the ppolicy overlay from the replicated backend (I'm still
checking if there's anything we actually use it for, but if it's inherently
unsafe in this configuration then it's gotta go)
- Move all of the service accounts to another database that ppolicy is
not installed on.
Thanks!
7 months, 1 week
