Re: ldapi:
Andrew Findlay wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 08:37:01AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I don't get where you're getting this idea from. I've never been
> required to use ldapi for setting up cn=config. The requirement of
> using ldapi for cn=config management is something Debian/Ubuntu is
> doing. Which is why, again, I say this specifically is not
> something to be documented by the OpenLDAP project as a cn=config
> requirement.
OK - forget the link to cn=config - that is just what got me interested
in ldapi: to start with.
The ldapi: transport seems to be almost undocumented. There is a brief
(but useful) mention in ldap.conf(5) but very little elsewhere.
I have found enough hints in the archives to get started, so I will file
some suggestions.
Everything worth noting about ldapi: was already published as an IETF
Informational Draft, and I've already posted the link to that document several
times. Beyond that it's no different from any other LDAP URL.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/