h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:

Full_Name: Hallvard B Furuseth Version: HEAD OS: Linux URL: Submission from: (NULL) (129.240.6.233) Submitted by: hallvard

With the latest back-ldif/ldif.c (rev 1.99), ./run -b ldif test048-syncrepl-multiproxy breaks with "master and P1 slave databases differ" and ./run -b ldif test018-syncreplication-persist when patched to not reject $BACKEND = ldif breaks with "producer and consumer databases differ".

The offender is "rename to same DN" (ITS#5319), i.e. rev 1.99. Unless there is a big "duh!" in it, it exposed a syncrepl bug.

Yes, thanks. The consumer assumed that an entry being renamed would have no other modifications associated with it. This assumption is wrong. There are no rename ops in test018, but apparently back-ldif is not returning the RDN with the same case as the original entry, so syncrepl assumes a rename (that only changed letter case) was done.

Still looking at the fix.