hyc@symas.com wrote:

Peter Palmreuther wrote:

...

hyc@symas.com wrote:

[...[

...

...

Thanks. Please try the syncprov.c in CVS HEAD. (Also you should probably be testing the RE24 code now, not 2.4.19.)

[...] ran several thousand test iterations without a single failure yet. [...] Is this fix "back-portable" to 2.4.19 source, so I can compile a 2.4.19-custom version??? [...]

The patch will be in 2.4.20, which will be released soon.

Thanks a lot :-)

Just for the record, so I can - close this case internally, and - justify the upcoming upgrade toward our change and release management:

What was the problem? The second server sending back received synced operations or the first server processing those "send backs"? Or was it just "some pixie dust" on the WLAN cable? ;-)