> Since all those functions are not meant to be exposed, I guess fixing
> the (mis)use of the ldap namespace should not create issues.
Wait for 2.5 to break binary compatibility. If a function is there
is useful, people will dig it out and use it.
Agreed. But we can probably fix slapd's use of ldap_int APIs.
Just like back-bdb used
(uses?) some internal Berkeley DB locking function.
(Not any more...)
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/