h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:

ando@sys-net.it writes:

...

Since all those functions are not meant to be exposed, I guess fixing the (mis)use of the ldap namespace should not create issues.

Wait for 2.5 to break binary compatibility. If a function is there and is useful, people will dig it out and use it.

Agreed. But we can probably fix slapd's use of ldap_int APIs.

Just like back-bdb used (uses?) some internal Berkeley DB locking function.

(Not any more...)