Markus Junginger wrote: >> There was never a bug here. The doc is quite explicit >> http://www.lmdb.tech/doc/group__mdb.html#ga73a5938ae4c3239ee11efa07eb22b882 >> >> After txn_abort the only valid call on a still-open cursor is >> cursor_renew, not cursor_close. > > However you want to call it, are you open to improve this workflow? > > API-wise, it would be so much simpler just to free a cursor after it became > obsolete. It's counter-intuitive to open a new txn, renew the cursor, close > the cursor, and abort the txn - just to close a cursor. API-wise, it is much simpler to just close the cursor before closing its transaction, if you have no need to reuse the cursor.