Hello,
I have additional information. The problem is the entryCSN.
User 1, which got replicated has entryCSN:
20150827083333.751721Z#000000#001#000000
user 2, which got NOT replicated has entryCSN:
20150827083333.119585Z#000000#001#000000, which seems to be in the past
user 3, replicated, 20150827083334.847604Z#000000#001#000000
user 4, not replicated 20150827083334.228113Z#000000#001#000000, which
seems to be in the past
user 5, replicated 20150827083335.588191Z#000000#001#000000
user 6, replicated 20150827083335.946835Z#000000#001#000000
user 7 not replicated 20150827083335.282686Z#000000#001#000000, which
seems to be in the past
So in previous posts I got the answer, that microseconds exact time
synchronization is only important with master master and concurrent
writes. But now it also seems to be important with delta-synrepl.
So I suppose this ITS can be closed, since it is not a bug, but worked as
designed?
So how to get a good enough time synchronization with windows (since the
normal time synchronization of windows seems to be not enough)?
Of course, if you close the ITS I can ask this question again in the
technical list.
Regards,
Frank
ITS#8295 may be the problem here. Fixed in git master. Please test and
followup to that ticket, thanks.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp.
http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/project/