Sergio.Gelato@astro.su.se wrote:

Full_Name: Sergio Gelato Version: 2.4.40 OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (85.225.123.9)

As currently implemented (since ITS#7027, 5de85b922aaa5bfa6eb53db6000adf01ebdb0736) the algorithm to shuffle DNS SRV records of a given priority according to their weights is flawed: if all records have the same weight, the implementation is biased towards the first record and against the last. In the most extreme case of two records of weight 1, the current implementation will never swap them (whereas one would have hoped for a swap 50% of the time). The problem can be cured by changing (r <= 0) to (r < 0). (The wording of the RFC may have contributed to this error; I suspect it was written with real random deviates in mind, not integer ones. In any event, the principle that records of equal weight should have the same probability of being picked trumps the RFC since the latter only says what algorithm SHOULD be used.)

I've written and tested a patch for this and found it to solve the above problem. My patch also addresses another (operationally minor, which is why I'm not reporting it separately) issue in the same piece of code: what if at least two, but not all, of the records of a given priority have weight zero? One should be prepared to switch to a Fisher-Yates shuffle if "total" becomes zero during the iteration.

(Yet another potential issue is overflow of "total" on platforms where INT_MAX==32767 if the sum of the weights exceeds that value. Consider declaring it uint32_t or u_long.)

I see no patch nor URL.