Steve Paras-Charlton wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:32 -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
steve@falchion.com wrote:
2.4.17 fails in an identical manner.
For those interested, 2.4.17 failed to compile because the installed 2.4.16 libs were being picked up instead of the freshly compiled ones during the link phase.
Looks like a problem in your OpenSSL build, not in OpenLDAP.
Any ideas what that problem might be or what leads you to believe this?
The backtrace shows that these SSL functions are contained inside your libldap_r shared library object file. Usually they should be present in OpenSSL's own shared libraries. If OpenSSL was only provided as a static library, it's not clear that their code will behave correctly when used inside a shared library (i.e., PIC vs non-PIC dependencies).
Unfortunately this OpenSSL is the one distributed by IBM as part of the AIX operating system, so it's not really my build... If I'm going to go to them with this, I could use a little more ammo :)
It would also help if you compile without optimization, with debug symbols, and run the non-stripped binaries. Your backtraces are lacking a lot of info at the moment.
Steve
Steve
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:04 -0700, Steve Paras-Charlton wrote:
Currently 2.4.17 fails to compile under AIX 5.3TL10, so I'll try to work on it, but in the meantime, any ideas why 2.4.16 is crashing thus?
Steve
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 15:58 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Monday, July 20, 2009 3:52 PM -0700 Steve Paras-Charlton steve@falchion.com wrote:
Haven't tried it. is it stable now (or soon to be?)
I'd assume that depends on what bugs people report against it. Knowing whether or not this affects 2.4.17 would certainly be useful in that determination. ;)
--Quanah
-
hyc＠symas.com