Kartik Subbarao wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
> This bug report makes no sense; the code you quoted is not part of
> OpenLDAP 2.4.16. The relevant code is in function tlsg_session_accept()
> in tls_g.c, and there is no such bug in that function.
Well, according to the CVS head branch, the code that I cited in tls.c
is still there:
But I certainly defer to your knowledge of which code is relevant
Read the Makefile; tls.c is not used any more.
was just looking around for a possible explanation to the problem that
I double-checked the version that I was running and it's actually
2.4.15, not 2.4.16. Would there be a significant difference between
these two versions with respect to TLS certificate handling?
Yes. Read the 2.4.16 CHANGES.
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/