Howard Chu wrote: > This bug report makes no sense; the code you quoted is not part of > OpenLDAP 2.4.16. The relevant code is in function tlsg_session_accept() > in tls_g.c, and there is no such bug in that function. Well, according to the CVS head branch, the code that I cited in tls.c is still there: http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/libraries/libldap/tls... But I certainly defer to your knowledge of which code is relevant

-- I was just looking around for a possible explanation to the problem that I'm encountering. I double-checked the version that I was running and it's actually 2.4.15, not 2.4.16. Would there be a significant difference between these two versions with respect to TLS certificate handling?