1:31 p.m.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
Issue ID: 9866
Summary: delta-sync memleak on Adds
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Due to the entry->e_name massaging in back-mdb/add.c (ITS#5326) syncrepl wasn't
freeing the non-normalized DN as expected after add finished.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
9:16 a.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs_review |
Target Milestone|--- |2.5.13
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
8:36 a.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Fixed in master 14972a7ae1142cccdad6db3ac50ecc47d0ecfa91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
8:44 a.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
--- Comment #2 from Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> ---
Does this affect any add operation to a back-mdb database or does this mem leak
only happen if delta-syncrepl is used. (The latter seems implied by the bug's
subject.)
Why I'm asking: You might remember that I'm trying to find the cause for
ever-growing memory usage on Æ-DIR providers (see also ITS#9365). Æ-DIR does
not use delta-syncrepl but the Æ-DIR providers have slapo-accesslog enabled for
storing an audit trail. And the accesslog DB is of course using back-mdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
8:50 a.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
The bug title is accurate. It only affects Adds performed by the delta-sync
consumer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
11:55 a.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 14972a7a
by Howard Chu at 2022-06-16T21:32:07+01:00
ITS#9866 delta-sync: fix DN leak on Adds
RE26:
• 5a292046
by Howard Chu at 2022-06-17T14:42:33+01:00
ITS#9866 delta-sync: fix DN leak on Adds
RE25:
• 50a65a73
by Howard Chu at 2022-06-23T18:47:25+00:00
ITS#9866 delta-sync: fix DN leak on Adds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
2:18 p.m.
New subject: [Issue 9866] delta-sync memleak on Adds
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
503
days inactive
531
days old
6 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
openldap-its＠openldap.org