Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or we are doing something wrong. For quite some time now, we have been using ldap to provide group information for our linux/unix desktop machines. I believer there are multiple methods of providing group access, this is the format we are using:
# foobar, group, cs.brown.edu dn: cn=foobar,ou=group,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu objectClass: posixGroup objectClass: top cn: ugrad gidNumber: 1200 memberUid: t1 memberUid: t2 memberUid: t3 memberUid: t4 memberUid: t5 . . .
Up until recently, this had been working great. We are now experiencing hangs whenever we try to update the records with one particular group. I think the hangs are occur when we try to feed too much data to ldapmodify at a time. For instance, if I have the above group and try to apply the following ldif file:
dn: cn=foobar,ou=group,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu changetype: modify replace: memberUid memberUid: t1 memberUid: t2 memberUid: t3 memberUid: t4 memberUid: t5 memberUid: t6 memberUid: t7 memberUid: t8 memberUid: t9 . . . memberUid: t2477 memberUid: t2478 memberUid: t2479
The update simply hangs. Tossing a "-d 65535" shows that the process is sitting in loop spitting out messages similar to:
ldap_int_select ldap_result ld 0x1e72bf0 msgid 5 wait4msg ld 0x1e72bf0 msgid 5 (timeout 100000 usec) wait4msg continue ld 0x1e72bf0 msgid 5 all 1 ** ld 0x1e72bf0 Connections: * host: ldapmaster.cs.brown.edu port: 6360 (default) refcnt: 2 status: Connected last used: Thu Oct 15 10:27:45 2009 ** ld 0x1e72bf0 Outstanding Requests: * msgid 5, origid 5, status InProgress outstanding referrals 0, parent count 0 ld 0x1e72bf0 request count 1 (abandoned 0) ** ld 0x1e72bf0 Response Queue: Empty ld 0x1e72bf0 response count 0 ldap_chkResponseList ld 0x1e72bf0 msgid 5 all 1 ldap_chkResponseList returns ld 0x1e72bf0 NULL ldap_int_select
Hopefully, this means something more to someone on this list than it does to me;) Interestingly, if I drop the last entry and change the ldif file to be:
dn: cn=foobar,ou=group,dc=cs,dc=brown,dc=edu changetype: modify replace: memberUid memberUid: t1 memberUid: t2 memberUid: t3 memberUid: t4 memberUid: t5 memberUid: t6 memberUid: t7 memberUid: t8 memberUid: t9 . . . memberUid: t2476 memberUid: t2477 memberUid: t2478
Then the update proceeds. However, if I change the last entry to read:
memberUid: t2478000
Then it hangs again. Whereas with the last entry of
memberUid: t247800
it updates just fine. This smells of some buffer filling or something else similar.
We are running with debian's lenny version of openldap, version 2.4.11-1 (not sure what's different about the "-1" version). Other details which may be pertinent:
- we are running back_bdb - syncprov - GSSAPI authentication
I have not tried setting up a test server running 2.4.16/19, but did spend time looking through the chnage logs and bug system and didn't see anything that appeared to apply. However, I certainly could have missed something.
Any help would be most appreciated, as we currently have one group which we are no longer able to add any entries to.
Thanks!
Mark
--On Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:41 PM -0400 Mark Dieterich mkd@cs.brown.edu wrote:
Any help would be most appreciated, as we currently have one group which we are no longer able to add any entries to.
openldap-bugs@openldap.org is not a general discussion list. It is for tracking bugs filed via the ITS system at http://www.openldap.org/its. After you file an ITS, you can then respond via email to the generated messages so that data goes into the ITS.
Given the multitude of issues fixed since 2.4.11, I would advise you upgrade to the latest stable (2.4.19) for those reasons alone. It would be good to know if you still see this issue, and I wonder if it is possibly related in some way to ITS#6327, although that is with searches on an entry with an attribute with many values.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration