Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:

FWIW any chance to reconsider having both build systems?

I have no desire to support multiple build systems. The Project does not = support any tools that we don't use ourselves.

The files you add significantly increase the line count, and don't even c= ontain any comments. In contrast, the current Makefile is mostly comments.

with meson it is easy to build on windows. Plus I'd like you to see at these numbers: =20 time make: real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m5.629s user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m5.197s sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.399s =20 time meson build real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.452s user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.335s sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.131s =20 time ninja -C build real=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.992s user=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m1.812s sys=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0m0.362s =20 You can see that configuring and building with meson is faster than jus=

t using make

On my system the majority of build time is in gcc itself. The proportion = of time that make itself uses is trivial. I would guess the only reason you're seeing = a speedup is because meson parallelizes the build. You would get the same effect using= "make -jXX".

=20 On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:31 PM Ignacio Casal Quinteiro <nacho.resa@gmai=

l.com mailto:nacho.resa@gmail.com> wrote:

=20 yeah... knowing my previous tries with lmdb I did not have much hop=

e...

=20 On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:21 PM Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com <mailto:hy=

c@symas.com>> wrote:

=20 nacho.resa@gmail.com mailto:nacho.resa@gmail.com wrote: > Full_Name: Ignacio Casal Quinteiro > Version: > OS: > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (54.239.6.177) > > > Meson is the new thing out there, =20 No.

--=20 -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/