rhafer@suse.de wrote:

...

...

Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works around that problem.

What about using replace instead?

That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So it doesn't work as well.

Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in place...

p.

Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team

SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it ---------------------------------------