Re: (ITS#8354) syncprov segv
--On Saturday, January 23, 2016 2:43 PM +0000 tpretz(a)gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon
check rather than init later).
I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop
instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold
as the list modification.
Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday
Hi Tom,
Are you able to confirm if the fix is good? I'm working on 2.4.44, and
want to be sure this fix is included.
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration