10 Aug
2015
10 Aug
'15
9 a.m.
Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
Den 10. aug. 2015 14:41, skrev Hallvard Breien Furuseth:
It's total time which is interesting when looking for hot spots which need attention. So I suggest that plus either one of the others, or percentage of the total spent doing one of the others.
Sorry - total+one of the other was silly probably, it just leaves us calculating the missing one when looking for that one. Total + percentage of one of the others makes sense, or (etime, qtime) since a high value still will stand out.
Yes, I prefer explicit (etime, qtime) - anyone who needs the total can add it up themselves.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/