On 23 mai 2013, at 16:31, Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
pa(a)marcelot.net wrote:
> Full_Name: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
> Version: 2.4.35
> OS: Linux Mint
> URL:
ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
> Submission from: (NULL) (78.226.4.211)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like it's not possible to modify the 'objectClass' attribute of
> configuration entries.
Correct. The config DIT has very rigid schema and layout rules.
Indeed.
> I have some code generating entries for OpenLDAP configuration
from a UI utility
> and updating existing configuration entries in DIT.
> This code generates entries with the 'objectClass' attribute containing the
full
> object class hierarchy (all the way to 'top') and not only the highest
> structural object class (which is the case of default OpenLDAP configuration).
>
> When updating the configuration in the DIT, the code then tries to complete the
> 'objectClass' attribute with the full list of object classes.
> That operations ends with "error code 53- UnwillingToPerform".
Don't do that.
Sure, that's why I have a *bad* workaround to not update the 'objectClass'
attribute even if the original and my generated one don't match.
Still, looking at LDAP standards, that doesn't seem to be a naughty operation at all
and nothing is really wrong with the resulting entry.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
> Here's an example on the "cn=config" entry:
> #!RESULT ERROR
> #!CONNECTION ldap://10.211.55.13:389
> #!DATE 2013-05-22T14:56:03.039
> #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 53 - UnwillingToPerform]
> dn: cn=config
> changetype: modify
> replace: objectClass
> objectClass: olcConfig
> objectClass: olcGlobal
> objectClass: top
> -
>
>
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp.
http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun
http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP
http://www.openldap.org/project/