6 Apr
2021
6 Apr
'21
8:09 a.m.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9517
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@openldap.org --- (In reply to gilbert.kowarzyk from comment #4)
I seems that the compromise of leaving out "parallelism" goes a bit against it's original design.
Probably an issue to take up with the libsodium authors if you want to pursue this. On the OpenLDAP side, we support building against libsodium or libargon2. If you need parallelism, link to libargon2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.