https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9217
--- Comment #3 from Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com --- (In reply to Howard Chu from comment #2)
(In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #1)
How about just giving up this .666-is-experimental nonsense, define .666 assignments as "official" and leave all OID assignments as is?
Something like that. We probably should never have had such a grab-bag "experimental" arc in the first place.
Yes!
In the future, we should simply allocate per-feature arcs,
Full ack!
We're probably stuck with the current .666 usages. Again, OIDs aren't supposed to change after they've been used in the wild. But someone should still document what the current .666 uses are.
This means e.g. updating this: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chu-ldap-logschema-00
BTW: I can't find this draft in doc/drafts/ though...