reinhold.may@gmx.de wrote:
Raphael,
My new crystal ball tells me that you are not saying the essential part of the problem: you are using back-ldif, isn't it ?
It is! Did I miss a hint which would have told me not to use back-ldif or use it differently?
back-ldif is really not meant for general use. It does no caching or indexing, so it will perform very poorly in general. It was only written to provide a base for cn=config.