On 30. juni 2015 14:52, email@example.com wrote:
We have already documented this. "Database names are kept as keys in the unnamed database."
"Hey, that may mean I can drop a DB without having to open it and mess with LMDB's DBI handling! Let me try this..."
It should be obvious that if you muck with the record of an existing key, things will change, therefore you should not muck with those keys.
Lots of people think differently than you or me.
We're not going to agree. Not on this, and not on what you said in your next mail. I don't see the point of rehashing those arguments yet again, and I didn't intend to. I was just ITSing a commit before pushing, _after_ asking you about it. I thought.