kiwi@oav.net wrote:
No surprise that such a careful redesign resulted, as a side effect, in a stricter compliance with RFC2589. The fact that nobody complained up to now indicates that strict adherence to specs usually helps in code portability.
Yeah. But I didn't know that RFC2589 is used inside back_<whatever>. Now I am aware of that and I really thanks about your help and your kindness to take some time to find where my error was.
I think he meant RFC2849, which is the LDIF specification.
Maybe a little not in slapd-perl man page that entry sent to openldap have to conform to RFC2589 should be a point to avoid such loss of time.
The slapd-perl(5) man page says that it expects LDIF entries to be returned. As such, it is already a given that they must actually conform to the LDIF spec.
Thanks again, and this bug is closed for me.