openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20894 discussions

[Issue 9769] New: Patch new feature batch get
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9769 Issue ID: 9769 Summary: Patch new feature batch get Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rouzier(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 859 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=859&action=edit New functionality mdb_cursor_get_batch New functionality mdb_cursor_get_batch mdb_cursor_get_batch retrieves a page worth of key/values. This is to reduce the number of function calls when doing a scan of the database. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 8988] Undefined Behavior in slapadd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Dec '21

16 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988 --- Comment #22 from noloader(a)gmail.com <noloader(a)gmail.com> --- On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:59 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: > > noloader(a)gmail.com wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:32 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote: > >> > >> noloader(a)gmail.com wrote: > >> ... > >>> I encourage OpenLDAP to fix the undefined behavior. OpenLDAP is an > >>> important project, and the undefined behavior is causing too many > >>> tangential problems. > >> > >> Undefined behavior is not a bug, nor is it prohibited by the C spec. It is a necessary > >> part of the language for its intended use as a system programming language, writing > >> machine-specific programs. Anyone who says it is prohibited by the spec is wrong. The kernel recently got bitten using the same pattern of unaligned short pointers through casts. GCC produced code which corrupted initramfs during unpacking. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363. OpenLDAP should fix that code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9771] New: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Dec '21

15 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9771 Issue ID: 9771 Summary: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shoober420(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 861 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=861&action=edit openldap build log When trying to build openldap from current master commit (https://github.com/openldap/openldap/commit/75636a407e38f1502c592566b5bf4c3…), I get the following error. Full build log attached. libtool: link: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 -march=native -O3 -pipe -fno-plt -fno-common -fipa-pta -falign-functions=32 -fdevirtualize-at-ltrans -fuse-linker-plugin -floop-nest-optimize -fgraphite-identity -fexcess-precision=fast -w -flto=auto -Wl,-O1 -o .libs/ftest ftest.o -Wl,--as-needed ./.libs/libldap.so /var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.so ../../libraries/liblber/.libs/liblber.so ../../libraries/liblutil/liblutil.a -lgnutls -luuid /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:338: urltest] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:326: apitest] Error 1 make[2]: *** [Makefile:334: testavl] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:330: ftest] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:328: dntest] Error 1 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:332: ltest] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries/libldap' make[1]: *** [Makefile:312: all-common] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-9999/work/openldap-9999-abi_x86_32.x86/libraries' make: *** [Makefile:320: all-common] Error 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9739] New: Undefined reference to ber_sockbuf_io_udp in 2.6.0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Dec '21

15 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9739 Issue ID: 9739 Summary: Undefined reference to ber_sockbuf_io_udp in 2.6.0 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- While I was trying to build OpenLDAP 2.6 on Fedora Rawhide I've got the error message: /usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ber_sockbuf_io_udp' I've checked commits from https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 and found that 'ber_sockbuf_io_udp' was not added to https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/liblber/… I've asked on the project's mailing list and got a reply: "That symbol only exists if OpenLDAP is built with LDAP_CONNECTIONLESS defined, which is not a supported feature. Feel free to file a bug report at https://bugs.openldap.org/" https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/… Hence, creating the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9493] New: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Dec '21

14 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493 Issue ID: 9493 Summary: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.57 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: svella(a)technologist.com Target Milestone: --- I observed this in the debugger while working on a small feature addition to slapo-accesslog. log_cf_gen(), when handling the initial configuration of oldAccessLogOldAttr (accesslog.c:989), linked list li_oldattrs is being built by inserting each value in order at the head of the list, resulting in the list being in reverse order. But when handling LDAP_MOD_DELETE of same attribute (accesslog.c:989), it is using the index of the removed value (valx) to find and removed the entry in the linked list, but it's counting from the head of li_oldattrs and not the tail, resulting in the wrong item being removed from the list unless counting from the head or the tail happens find the same item. (Line numbers refer to commit 6c469f07935e351e349bf38fc223dab704c51a76) Handling of oldAccessLogBase appears to have the same problem, and a cursory glance through the source of other overlays reveals a similar pattern, and I'm guessing the same problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 21

[Issue 9282] New: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Dec '21

13 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282 Issue ID: 9282 Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.50 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Scenario: 2 node Multi-provider replication Add database to provider A ensure database replicates to provider B Stop provider A delete entry on provider B Start provider A Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A Deleted entry re-appears -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 22

[Issue 9765] New: slapd crash
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Dec '21

08 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9765 Issue ID: 9765 Summary: slapd crash Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.46 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shivaprasadtp(a)yahoo.in Target Milestone: --- Start-up two slapd server instances. Configure syncreply overlay with one of the servers as a provider and the other one as consumer. Create around 100 users. Now start changing syncrepl configuration for one of the slapd servers, lets say the consumer server, in a loop with 5 seconds delay. After few mins the slapd server crashes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9757] New: The private key of the ldap certificate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9757 Issue ID: 9757 Summary: The private key of the ldap certificate Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ydgdsnn(a)163.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 856 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=856&action=edit prikey.key Current situation: The private key of the ldap certificate is used to set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_KEYFILE when bind, and this file is currently stored in plain text. Appeal: Can we store the ciphertext of the file, and then decrypt it when we use it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8485] [PATCH] Adding support for encrypted server private keys
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8485 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ydgdsnn(a)163.com --- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- *** Issue 9757 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9754] New: segfault after adding olcAccess
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '21

02 Dec '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 Issue ID: 9754 Summary: segfault after adding olcAccess Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: goudal(a)enseirb.fr Target Milestone: --- On a new production server 2.6.0 on ubuntu 20.04 LTS uptodate. After adding an olcAccess attribute I got a segfault. The aclValue added is {9}to attrs=ipbCompteValide,ipbEtendue,mailForwardingAddress by dn.base="uid=cptadmin,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr" write by * read (the ipbXXX attrs are local ones). I have tried to add it twice and it did segfault twice. Here are the last logs for the server (logLevel was on sync). Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7f3a475615c0 20211125133351.609580Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 MOD dn="dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 MOD attr=contextCSN Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a48001440 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1053 op=1 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=2 csn= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291397 RESULT tag=103 err=0 qtime=0.000017 etime=0.003762 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SRCH base="dc=ipb,dc=fr" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(entryUUID=29a4991c-9dda-103b-98c2-c3fe49d4fff9)" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SRCH attr=* + Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291398 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 qtime=0.000028 etime=0.000285 nentries=1 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 MOD dn="uid=pbouchevrea,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 MOD attr=ipbDateFin entryCSN modifiersName modifyTimestamp Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=uid=pbouchevrea,ou=people,dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a48001630 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 syncprov_findbase: searching Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7f3a438bc700 20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1053 op=1 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=2 csn=20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291399 RESULT tag=103 err=0 qtime=0.000025 etime=0.022224 text= Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7f3a438bc700 20211125133351.654596Z#000000#00a#000000 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 MOD dn="dc=ipb,dc=fr" Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 MOD attr=contextCSN Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 slapd[67824]: conn=1000 op=291400 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=dc=ipb,dc=fr on opc=0x7f3a50003440 Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 kernel: [262778.995540] slapd[68072]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f4ea0d3553e sp 00007f4e9dae9f48 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f4ea0cad000+178000] Nov 25 14:34:32 ldap2021 kernel: [262778.995584] Code: b6 07 29 c8 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 89 f8 31 d2 66 0f ef ff 09 f0 25 ff 0f 00 00 3d c0 0f 00 00 0f 8f 74 02 00 00 <f3> 0f 6f 0f f3 0f 6f 06 66 0f 74 c1\ 66 0f da c1 66 0f ef c9 66 0f Nov 25 14:34:36 ldap2021 slapd[70083]: * Stopping OpenLDAP slapd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs