openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20891 discussions

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #24 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- A reminder that the OpenLDAP Project is worked solely by volunteers. Symas does not direct the operation of the Project. They merely provide support for what the Project releases. Your criticism of Symas is wholly out of place. Meanwhile, criticizing work that was given to you for free, without you ever lifting a finger to contribute, just makes you a selfish, entitled, ungrateful ass. If you think you can run things better, then actively contribute. That is the only way that open source projects advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #23 from jel+git(a)linofee.org --- Just upgraded a server from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04, which contains 2.5.x and found out, that the options -p and -h got dropped - and requires me to adjust quite a bit of scripts because of this non-sense. This is such a poor software management and versioning, hard to believe, that anyone who allowed it to go through, has any experience in enterprise ready software. 1) If one decides to drop an option, it should be a) communicated clearly. b) documented and alternatives shown 2) If a software gets released, which has an incompatible change wrt. previous major.minor.tiny version, it should rise the major number of the software version, so that OS/Distro vendors are warned and may decide to stick with the old version. There are several options to allow -H and -h,-p side by side - openldap has chosen the worst option. This might be a hint, how poor its maintenance actually is/how bad the support by sysmas probably is. This is also a good example, that for OS/Distro vendors it is sometimes a really good thing to stick with the older version instead of switching to the "latest" stuff. Anyway, thanx for the work. =8-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10158] New: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10158 Issue ID: 10158 Summary: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: umagmrit(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10013] New: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 17 Jan '24

17 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10013 Issue ID: 10013 Summary: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Certain parts of the source indicate that rs->sr_ctrls shouldn't be realloc'd/free'd unless REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED is set, but then other parts of slapd (slap_ctrl_whatFailed_add, glue_op_search?, ...) and overlays (ppolicy, syncprov, ...) will blindly overwrite and/or realloc it. slap_add_control() (an analog of slap_add_controls()) might be useful for this, possibly alongside some way to free the other data kept around to streamline the code other users need for correct operation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9944] New: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 Issue ID: 9944 Summary: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- On a system with olcDbIDAssertBind configured, and proxied authorizations working correctly, an olcDbACLBind statement was added to the configuration for lastbind support. However an incorrect identity was in place for the authzid in the ACL bind statement which caused proxy authorization to fail. The change was backed out (There was never any change to the olcDbIDAssertBind config fragment) and after that, all write operations failed instead of being proxied, with err=80. Restarting slapd fixed the issue, which indicates an underlying problem in the cn=config db in reverting to the original working state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10151] New: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10151 Issue ID: 10151 Summary: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Investigating the persistent CI failures in test050, I can see some memory leaks that should be tackled (if only to reduce noise). For one, when receiving an entry without a syncrepl control attached or when dealing with a concurrent thread removing that consumer, we leak our scratch data (decoded controls, modlist, ...). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10137] New: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10137 Issue ID: 10137 Summary: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.30 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: renault.cle(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 992 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=992&action=edit The patch do apply to midl.h Hello, I would like to slightly change the midl.h c file to make it possible to change the MDB_IDL_LOGN define without having to fork on my side. I know it can be redefined to reduce the amount of memory allocated by LMDB. I am using the latest `mdb.master` branch version of LMDB. https://github.com/mozilla/lmdb/pull/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10157] New: mdb_load doesn't build for me
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10157 Issue ID: 10157 Summary: mdb_load doesn't build for me Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vl(a)samba.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1001 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1001&action=edit Patch see attached patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • f5c96f44 by Howard Chu at 2024-01-10T17:05:13+00:00 ITS#7420 move entry_naming_check earlier in Add • 7debe76f by Howard Chu at 2024-01-15T16:43:56+00:00 ITS#7420 re-fix slapcommon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10154] New: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10154 Issue ID: 10154 Summary: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Configure the auto close action for PRs created on Github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs