openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20961 discussions

(ITS#7344) [PATCH] Add initial testsuit for slapo-constraint
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 02 Aug '12

02 Aug '12

Full_Name: Jan Synacek Version: master OS: linux-fedora17 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jsynacek-20120802-testsuit-slapo-constraint… Submission from: (NULL) (209.132.186.34) This patch adds an initial testsuit for slapo-constraint. The attached file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Red Hat. Red Hat has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Jan Synacek am authorized by Red Hat, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Red Hat hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7342) Password modify EXOP requires a DN
by hyc＠symas.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

eclements(a)apple.com wrote: > Full_Name: Eric Clements > Version: 2.4.26 > OS: MacOS > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (17.193.15.131) > > > RFC 3062 Section 2.1 (authored by OpenLDAP) states that a password modify > request may or may not be an LDAP DN, yet OpenLDAP backend requires a DN. I'm not sure I understand why you've filed this ITS. The RFC doesn't specify that a server MUST support non-DN valued identities. It in fact says in Section 3: If the server does not recognize provided fields or does not support the combination of fields provided, it SHALL NOT change the user password. Clearly it is allowed for a server to reject identities if it doesn't recognize them. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#7343) dynlist overlay does not include attributes of an entry containing objectClass of the dynlist attrset
by openldap＠stormcloud9.net 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

Full_Name: Patrick Hemmer Version: 2.4.31 OS: RHEL6 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (98.211.220.204) The issue is that if the entry being dynamically added to the parent entry has the objectClass slapo-dynlist is configured to use (to determine expansion), that entry is not dynamically added to the parent. For example: ---- dn: olcOverlay={4}dynlist,olcDatabase={3}hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDynamicList objectClass: olcOverlayConfig olcOverlay: {4}dynlist olcDlAttrSet: {0}labeledURIObject labeledURI ---- dn: cn=parent,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: top objectClass: labeledURIObject cn: parent member: uid=foo,dc=example,dc=com labeledURI: ldap:///cn=child,dc=example,dc=com??base?(objectClass=*) dn: cn=child,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: top objectClass: labeledURIObject member: uid=bar,dc=example,dc=com cn: child ---- In the above example, I would expect "member: uid=bar,dc=example,dc=com" to be added to cn=parent,dc=example,dc=com, but it isn't. Now the documentation clearly states recursion is not allowed, so if cn=child were to have a 'labeledURI', this labeledURI would not be expanded. But this is not what is being done here, cn=child has no labeledURI present. It also behaves perfectly fine if I pull the "objetClass: labeledURIObject" off cn=child. ldapsearch with objectClass labeledURIObject present on cn=child: ---- dn: cn=parent,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: top objectClass: labeledURIObject cn: parent member: uid=foo,dc=example,dc=com labeledURI: ldap:///cn=child,dc=example,dc=com??base?(objectClass=*) ---- ldapsearch without objectClass labeledURIObject present on cn=child: ---- dn: cn=parent,dc=example,dc=com objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: top objectClass: labeledURIObject cn: parent cn: child member: uid=foo,dc=example,dc=com member: uid=bar,dc=example,dc=com labeledURI: ldap:///cn=child,dc=example,dc=com??base?(objectClass=*) ----

1 0

(ITS#7342) Password modify EXOP requires a DN
by eclements＠apple.com 01 Aug '12

01 Aug '12

Full_Name: Eric Clements Version: 2.4.26 OS: MacOS URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (17.193.15.131) RFC 3062 Section 2.1 (authored by OpenLDAP) states that a password modify request may or may not be an LDAP DN, yet OpenLDAP backend requires a DN.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 31 Jul '12

31 Jul '12

On 07/30/2012 08:38 PM, Michael Ströder wrote: > Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >>> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for >>> ITS#7168. >> >> This works for me: >> >> slapd.ldif: >> ... >> dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config >> objectClass: olcOverlayConfig >> objectClass: olcConstraintConfig >> olcOverlay: constraint >> olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 >> olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 >> ... > > From the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. > > Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or > URL-based constraints. > > The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-constraint > quite heavily. > > Ciao, Michael. > I'm having hard time reproducing this. Still works for me. Please provide a minimal setup and an example that fails, so I can fix the patch. Thank you. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by michael＠stroeder.com 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010302040303070900010905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Synacek wrote: > On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: >> It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a= patch for >> ITS#7168. >=20 > This works for me: >=20 > slapd.ldif: > ... > dn: olcOverlay=3Dconstraint,olcDatabase=3D{1}bdb,cn=3Dconfig > objectClass: olcOverlayConfig > objectClass: olcConstraintConfig > olcOverlay: constraint > olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 > olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 > ... =46rom the excerpt above it seems you've only added a count constraint. Please use more features of slapo-constraint for testing, e.g. regex- or URL-based constraints. The patch for ITS#7168 broke all my customer setups since I'm slapo-const= raint quite heavily. Ciao, Michael. --------------ms010302040303070900010905 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILHzCC BT8wggQnoAMCAQICDwCmSwABAAIAivjZQ8SBvzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB8MQswCQYDVQQG EwJERTEcMBoGA1UEChMTVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgR21iSDElMCMGA1UECxMcVEMgVHJ1c3RD ZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBMMSBDQTEoMCYGA1UEAxMfVEMgVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIgQ2xhc3MgMSBM MSBDQSBJWDAeFw0xMjA2MDYxOTAyMTZaFw0xMzA2MDcxOTAyMTZaMCgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRkwFwYDVQQDDBBNaWNoYWVsIFN0csO2ZGVyMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIB CgKCAQEAxXZGav40rnGNLxEggBW94MILWHlfC8a23Jew5U1gPlfRTXOjjzmoaZ1uCyGdgF6M VvuO9T1aTQNGH+OdeGe3P7Tfc/NsLJFJ2wtd8blvhmodUgse2eypiWjNOd4gZuhalBhgsQ0K b5D6/1foghII4E264iZlJ7AJ+UYcO+GxvFWT0YMTbLckgDkZk7c3qwTozdhYvXarvqx+8Ou/ kuxpQQhac/ebzxpu0N+RHSf2KIUS0g0tEGnPtGv6iL+9QNHc4JKo9Y9KKVw3tQy+Re+FQLxB 1fPE5F+qxuD3AUENpOwkMsqWLM94ohtx3CFqLpxfUPrnKFLAHOhHEbByYGvFPwIDAQABo4IC EDCCAgwwgaUGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGYMIGVMFEGCCsGAQUFBzAChkVodHRwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0 Y2VudGVyLmRlL2NlcnRzZXJ2aWNlcy9jYWNlcnRzL3RjX2NsYXNzMV9MMV9DQV9JWC5jcnQw QAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGNGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLml4LnRjY2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1 c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAU6bgoHUbP/M34TpvF7ktg69g7P9EwDAYDVR0TAQH/ BAIwADBKBgNVHSAEQzBBMD8GCSqCFAAsAQEBATAyMDAGCCsGAQUFBwIBFiRodHRwOi8vd3d3 LnRydXN0Y2VudGVyLmRlL2d1aWRlbGluZXMwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgTwMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS2 KAWfTfgJ/JQ63qLGwTXYLnI+LzBiBgNVHR8EWzBZMFegVaBThlFodHRwOi8vY3JsLml4LnRj Y2xhc3MxLnRjdW5pdmVyc2FsLWkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY3JsL3YyL3RjX0NsYXNzMV9M MV9DQV9JWC5jcmwwMwYDVR0lBCwwKgYIKwYBBQUHAwIGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDBwYK KwYBBAGCNxQCAjAfBgNVHREEGDAWgRRtaWNoYWVsQHN0cm9lZGVyLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFAAOCAQEAQ3bvVUpEq+cQrLpcogyt5BJNk/WvUvOHqhzyj28M9pg9hcDl1+MYl5qqj6tR GSTLPQZyf287pcmbMwbcTGZO/gbW9v7RYcut6RauWdwKMCUmKC3J4fVfDq9ZETA2WOV68ef4 B3Gzdhghsbp3Rhp5dDmrCVKAHlafm6ZwJrEQ9P76fxnQZzRLgeKpZep5ePH5YHUB3+YaOQvJ FG0bOXvfHhRiRG7/HW2G+yDgjHSxDz8AFzMWL/RFePqZ4pn6T/SM/qU6WEpW39MWyJNoH/Kx QDYK8gGYuesn1ciMCTnjrvZQj0fonGTO4SfWekJRkuGrJ7dYSZRjYbDcWBBkdFLWzzCCBdgw ggTAoAMCAQICDgboAAEAAkqWLSQM/sXJMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMHkxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRF MRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSQwIgYDVQQLExtUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBVbml2ZXJzYWwgQ0ExJjAkBgNVBAMTHVRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIFVuaXZlcnNhbCBDQSBJ MB4XDTA5MTEwMzE0MDgxOVoXDTI1MTIzMTIxNTk1OVowfDELMAkGA1UEBhMCREUxHDAaBgNV BAoTE1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIEdtYkgxJTAjBgNVBAsTHFRDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNz IDEgTDEgQ0ExKDAmBgNVBAMTH1RDIFRydXN0Q2VudGVyIENsYXNzIDEgTDEgQ0EgSVgwggEi MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQC75pBuz2Lp6QuqthDVR+V8XSsncZpozVVt 5KLv5P7yemMRwleKyH3PjmYfZUVL64Biab1GjovFblqVGCrep/EfdRonq20yU+P7TVhiLP8Z 5cegDZotIYhZhM0d8cPIij6w5d4IJM/8QCy6QSOUu4ASiTVItoYE4AFPjLqpmPwcie0fiqHH hpgmHnJla/7PZdkMZEsaCfVDEWBmJuMzVprJPT40anjG5VBLyM2I5DlsUCaeQCy2O3w3sqf1 3dyzUcv03IICuNc63towXA31Qt0TaVNU6YAmQjMepdfMbspmCZ+G8D2+xophEPPR/1vkstst smUMqX0XrLonTUJczglPAgMBAAGjggJZMIICVTCBmgYIKwYBBQUHAQEEgY0wgYowUgYIKwYB BQUHMAKGRmh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvY2VydHNlcnZpY2VzL2NhY2VydHMv dGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcnQwNAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGKGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnRjdW5p dmVyc2FsLUkudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUkqR1LKSevoFE63n8isWVpesQ dXMwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBSBgNVHSAESzBJMAYGBFUdIAAwPwYJKoIUACwBAQEB MDIwMAYIKwYBBQUHAgEWJGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIuZGUvZ3VpZGVsaW5lczAO BgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOm4KB1Gz/zN+E6bxe5LYOvYOz/RMIH9BgNVHR8E gfUwgfIwge+ggeyggemGRmh0dHA6Ly9jcmwudGN1bml2ZXJzYWwtSS50cnVzdGNlbnRlci5k ZS9jcmwvdjIvdGNfdW5pdmVyc2FsX3Jvb3RfSS5jcmyGgZ5sZGFwOi8vd3d3LnRydXN0Y2Vu dGVyLmRlL0NOPVRDJTIwVHJ1c3RDZW50ZXIlMjBVbml2ZXJzYWwlMjBDQSUyMEksTz1UQyUy MFRydXN0Q2VudGVyJTIwR21iSCxPVT1yb290Y2VydHMsREM9dHJ1c3RjZW50ZXIsREM9ZGU/ Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVSZXZvY2F0aW9uTGlzdD9iYXNlPzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAOcjE m+6+mO5Icm+N53G2DpCM07LBFSGoRpBoX0oE8TrJaIQh2KXmBHVdn9LU8kt3QzLclctgvwJV 0KwcsMUUl5tlCsMPpR3s2Ek5lbWpvvr0HqtW56blAQiINV9nBd1EJFASIkRjefGbV2nOq9Yz UU+N8HA7jq1ROhd/NZZraGhjthwKyfjfHV7PKxGlY+3M0MbTIG+q/GhIfm0euDpFqhKG88e9 ALXr/uoSn3MzeOcoOWjTpW3adtFO4VWVgKbgG7jNrFbvRVlHmFLbOm4msjE5aXWxLiTwpJ2X iF4zKca1vAdAOgw9us90jEtOeiH6GzjNxEMvb7TfeO6Zkuc6HDGCA84wggPKAgEBMIGPMHwx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQLExxU QyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBD bGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAhMwGAYJKoZI hvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTIwNzMwMTgzODQyWjAjBgkq hkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUbkqitqiUB3AUptpJBP8IZf85VpcwbAYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMV8wXTALBglg hkgBZQMEASowCwYJYIZIAWUDBAECMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggq hkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDCBoAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMYGSMIGP MHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYDVQQL ExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENlbnRl ciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wgaIGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYGS oIGPMHwxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkRFMRwwGgYDVQQKExNUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBHbWJIMSUwIwYD VQQLExxUQyBUcnVzdENlbnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBMSgwJgYDVQQDEx9UQyBUcnVzdENl bnRlciBDbGFzcyAxIEwxIENBIElYAg8ApksAAQACAIr42UPEgb8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAE ggEANow9ad7A3wr3HYgEMXZdssyB+upyWbuJ5LwbagTwOvHqIIJRTaKTIEvnUk09t4Jm5EIn Z0Nx7RX/HhOSbK94k1azYSpfabscyEubVv5tmmIJLJ6uwGIk9+9tMr7D0sXj8AKxc5qb96sc 1Aj3NidCu5dE/qJhdiMK84FTAjqMbouQ0v+DaTuw8BDIjcQL7XNxyu536WAOB/5BGOtfms8e SXH2bvNfYbw25+HdC8OTibBoMJrFXZExyT6lpqjgPcSrcixF1bK/Y9w8kxgqq7keFAw3rcuK 7vXpYMYKdazQFhr6Z4XlvH8AOeSdpDgyy9u3miaV/f5p1TBPyQyMAlq9SgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms010302040303070900010905--

1 0

Re: (ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by jsynacek＠redhat.com 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

On 07/27/2012 10:47 PM, michael(a)stroeder.com wrote: > Full_Name: > Version: RE24 8a0ce24c5abaf687a41696d988f6a1330128368d > OS: > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (79.227.171.183) > > > It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for > ITS#7168. > > If the client sends valid data which not violates a constraint > CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION is returned: > > delete: departmentNumber > departmentNumber: old_number > - > add: departmentNumber > departmentNumber: new_number > - > > It seems turning off only the constraint for departmentNumber does not help. > Turning off all constraints makes it work. > This works for me: slapd.ldif: ... dn: olcOverlay=constraint,olcDatabase={1}bdb,cn=config objectClass: olcOverlayConfig objectClass: olcConstraintConfig olcOverlay: constraint olcConstraintAttribute: mail count 3 olcConstraintAttribute: description count 2 ... root.ldif: dn: dc=my-domain,dc=com objectclass: dcObject objectclass: organization dc: my-domain o: My Domain corp. user.ldif: dn: cn=usr2,dc=my-domain,dc=com objectclass: inetOrgPerson objectclass: organizationalPerson cn: usr2 sn: usr2 mail: original(a)email.com description: desc1 description: desc2 test.ldif: dn: cn=usr2,dc=my-domain,dc=com changetype: modify delete: description description: desc1 - add: description description: desc1-mod < operation is successful > Am I misunderstanding something? If it still doesn't work for you, please, provide more information including your configuration and an example that fails. -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat

1 0

(ITS#7341) Ordered list error in overlays.sdf and "attr" in access-control.sdf
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 30 Jul '12

30 Jul '12

Full_Name: Gavin Henry Version: master OS: URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (212.159.59.85) Submitted by: ghenry Small typos in access-control.sdf overlays.sdf.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7168) [PATCH] Fix count constraint when using multiple modifications
by quanah＠zimbra.com 28 Jul '12

28 Jul '12

--On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:19 AM +0000 jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: > On 06/07/2012 03:00 PM, Howard Chu wrote: >> jsynacek(a)redhat.com wrote: >>> Full_Name: Jan Synacek >>> Version: 2.4.29 >>> OS: Fedora 16 >>> URL: >>> http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/openldap/jsynacek-20120216-constraint- >>> count.patch Submission from: (NULL) (209.132.186.34) >>> This patch is broken. See ITS#7340 and discussion on -technical. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Sr. Member of Technical Staff Zimbra, Inc A Division of VMware, Inc. -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#7340) Regression in slapo-constraint
by michael＠stroeder.com 27 Jul '12

27 Jul '12

Full_Name: Version: RE24 8a0ce24c5abaf687a41696d988f6a1330128368d OS: URL: Submission from: (NULL) (79.227.171.183) It seems there's a regression in slapo-constraint possibly caused by a patch for ITS#7168. If the client sends valid data which not violates a constraint CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION is returned: delete: departmentNumber departmentNumber: old_number - add: departmentNumber departmentNumber: new_number - It seems turning off only the constraint for departmentNumber does not help. Turning off all constraints makes it work.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs