- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

Re: (ITS#5723) test046-dds failed
by ando＠sys-net.it 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote: > test046 fails due to insufficient access. Fixed in HEAD. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: ando(a)sys-net.it -----------------------------------

1 0

ITS#5724 (Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd backover.c)
by ando＠sys-net.it 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

ando(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Log Message: > open database using the real structure (partial fix to ITS#5724) We need a virtual database to inherit controls from the real database. Sharing the array of known controls could be a solution, but it wouldn't allow the virtual database to have specific controls, e.g. registered by an overlay. A solution would be to let the real database know it's related to virtual ones, so that modifications to the real database via back-config can be propagated to the virtual ones. This, of course, poses the problem that if a virtual database is deleted, any reference to it must be removed from the list of related databases. I wonder if all of this is worth the effort of exposing real controls by the virtual database. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: ando(a)sys-net.it -----------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5724) back-relay doesn't expose underlying database controls correctly
by ando＠sys-net.it 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

I have a fix for this issue when the relay database is configured *after* the relayed one. I'll commit it in a moment. However, this fix does not cure your case, where the virtual database needs to appear *before* the real one, and also does not cure similar issues related, for example, to run-time configuring modules that register controls on a real database (e.g. an overlay), which would not be echoed by the virtual database. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: ando(a)sys-net.it -----------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#5723) test046-dds failed
by ando＠sys-net.it 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote: > Full_Name: Dieter > Version: HEAD > OS: Linux > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.238.55) > > > Hello, > test046 fails due to insufficient access. > > slapd.1.log: > > ==> bdb_add: cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com > oc_check_required entry (cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com), objectClass > "g > roupOfNames" > oc_check_required entry (cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com), objectClass > "d > ynamicObject" > oc_check_allowed type "objectClass" > oc_check_allowed type "cn" > oc_check_allowed type "member" > oc_check_allowed type "entryTtl" > oc_check_allowed type "entryExpireTimestamp" > oc_check_allowed type "structuralObjectClass" > bdb_dn2entry("cn=meeting,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com") > => bdb_dn2id("cn=meeting,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com") > <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30989) > dnMatch 0 > "cn=bjorn jensen,ou=information technology > division,ou=people,dc=example > ,dc=com" > "cn=bjorn jensen,ou=information technology > division,ou=people,dc=example > ,dc=com" > bdb_add: no write access to attribute > send_ldap_result: conn=21 op=1 p=3 > send_ldap_result: err=50 matched="" text="no write access to attribute" > send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=50 > ber_flush2: 42 bytes to sd 13 > conn=21 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=50 text=no write access to attribute > connection_get(13) Looks like another side effect of checking write permission on attributes during add. At this point, I suspect we'd better add a configure switch that allows restore the old behavior. The switch could be removed as soon as obsolete, much like what occurred to schemacheck. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: ando(a)sys-net.it -----------------------------------

1 0

(ITS#5725) Connection enabled for events twice
by rein＠OpenLDAP.org 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

Full_Name: Rein Tollevik Version: CVS head OS: Linux 2.6 URL: Submission from: (NULL) (84.215.36.97) Submitted by: rein connection_client_setup() enables the connection for events twice, causing race conditions that can create deadlock situations. Ref: http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-devel/200810/msg00014.html A fix that removes the unnecessary call to slapd_set_read() will be committed soon. Rein Tollevik Basefarm AS

1 0

(ITS#5724) back-relay doesn't expose underlying database controls correctly
by Guillaume.Rousse＠inria.fr 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

Full_Name: Guillaume Rousse Version: 2.4.11 OS: linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (82.224.237.5) Here is a simple relay configuration: database relay suffix ou=telephony,dc=msr-inria,dc=inria,dc=fr overlay rwm rwm-suffixmassage ou=users,dc=msr-inria,dc=inria,dc=fr rwm-map attribute telephoneNumber homePhone rwm-map attribute telephoneNumber database bdb suffix "dc=msr-inria,dc=inria,dc=fr" rootdn "cn=root,dc=msr-inria,dc=inria,dc=fr" However, queries with critical pagedResult control fails: Oct 2 14:07:29 etoile slapd[30006]: conn=118 op=1 SRCH base="ou=telephony,dc=msr-inria,dc=inria,dc=fr" scope=2 deref=3 filter="(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)" Oct 2 14:07:29 etoile slapd[30006]: conn=118 op=1 SRCH attr=uid givenname initials sn manager departmentnumber telephonenumber mail title homephone mobile pager Oct 2 14:07:29 etoile slapd[30006]: conn=118 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=12 nentries=0 text=critical control unavailable in context Oct 2 14:16:15 etoile slapd[6002]: => get_ctrls Oct 2 14:16:15 etoile slapd[6002]: => get_ctrls: oid="1.2.840.113556.1.4.319" (critical) Oct 2 14:16:15 etoile slapd[6002]: <= get_ctrls: n=1 rc=0 err=""

1 0

(ITS#5723) test046-dds failed
by dieter＠dkluenter.de 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

Full_Name: Dieter Version: HEAD OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.238.55) Hello, test046 fails due to insufficient access. slapd.1.log: ==> bdb_add: cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com oc_check_required entry (cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com), objectClass "g roupOfNames" oc_check_required entry (cn=Meeting,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com), objectClass "d ynamicObject" oc_check_allowed type "objectClass" oc_check_allowed type "cn" oc_check_allowed type "member" oc_check_allowed type "entryTtl" oc_check_allowed type "entryExpireTimestamp" oc_check_allowed type "structuralObjectClass" bdb_dn2entry("cn=meeting,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=meeting,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_NOTFOUND: No matching key/data pair found (-30989) dnMatch 0 "cn=bjorn jensen,ou=information technology division,ou=people,dc=example ,dc=com" "cn=bjorn jensen,ou=information technology division,ou=people,dc=example ,dc=com" bdb_add: no write access to attribute send_ldap_result: conn=21 op=1 p=3 send_ldap_result: err=50 matched="" text="no write access to attribute" send_ldap_response: msgid=2 tag=105 err=50 ber_flush2: 42 bytes to sd 13 conn=21 op=1 RESULT tag=105 err=50 text=no write access to attribute connection_get(13) -Dieter

1 0

Re: (ITS#5709) slapd sync provider skips some objects
by quanah＠zimbra.com 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

--On Tuesday, September 23, 2008 2:32 PM +0000 sylvain.thomas(a)gmail.com wrote: > I can provide a detailed log (loglevel -1) and any other information > required. The environment and the configuration files are the same as for > ITS 5661, but I do not use the mirror mode. > Thanks for your help Can you: (a) reproduce with the current RE24 source? (b) Can you provide your slapd.conf files? Thanks, Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: ITS#5707 [Fwd: Re: 4.7.25 deadlock]
by quanah＠zimbra.com 02 Oct '08

02 Oct '08

--On Friday, September 26, 2008 4:13 PM +0000 quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: The patch to fix this issue is now in OpenLDAP cvs: <http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/build/db.4.7.25.patch?hideattic=1&…> --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

(ITS#5722) dn cache size exceeds the limits
by p_pavlos＠freemail.gr 02 Oct '08

02 Oct '08

Full_Name: Pavlos Parissis Version: 2.4.11 OS: Linux 2.6 RH AE 4.6 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (77.250.22.95) Hi, During performance testing with SLAMD we noticed the dncache exceeds the limit. As a result the system starts to swap a lot and the responses of slapd are very slow. Here are the facts: slapd.conf monitoring on tool-threads 4 cachesize 450000 dncachesize 450000 idlcachesize 450000 cachefree 90000 # ldapsearch -x -D "cn=xxxx" -w xx -b 'cn=database 2,cn=databases,cn=monitor' -s sub '(objectclass=*)' '*' '+' | grep -i Cache olmBDBEntryCache: 398306 olmBDBDNCache: 482001 <<========== olmBDBIDLCache: 449999 # slapd -V @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.4.11 (Sep 11 2008 10:58:58) $ root@node3:/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openldap-2.4.11/servers/slapd #db_stat -V Berkeley DB 4.6.21: (September 27, 2007) # uname -r 2.6.9-67.ELsmp # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 6) Cheers, Pavlos

1 0

(ITS#5721) Expansion on dncachesize behavior
by quanah＠zimbra.com 02 Oct '08

02 Oct '08

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: 24/HEAD OS: NA URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (75.111.29.239) The behavior of the dncachesize setting when it is not ideal (2x) is not documented. Howard notes: The DN cache is allowed to temporarily grow beyond the configured size. It does this if many entries are locked when it tries to do a purge, because that means they're legitimately in use. Also the dn cache never purges entries that have cached children, so depending on the shape of the DIT, it could have lots over the defined limit. This would be useful to note in the slapd-bdb & slapd-hdb man pages.

1 0

Re: ITS#5713
by ando＠sys-net.it 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Gavin Henry wrote: > ----- ando(a)sys-net.it wrote: > >> Probably, the right fix consists in changing that attr's syntax to >> DirectoryString, and allow all syntaxes, from "--w-------" to passing >> >> the value to strtol(value, NULL, 0) etc. > > Shall we mention the new syntax support in that section of the guide? I'll the man page too. Well, probably yes. Thanks, p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ----------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Fax: +39 0382 476497 Email: ando(a)sys-net.it -----------------------------------

1 0

Re: ITS#5713
by ghenry＠OpenLDAP.org 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

----- ando(a)sys-net.it wrote: > Probably, the right fix consists in changing that attr's syntax to > DirectoryString, and allow all syntaxes, from "--w-------" to passing > > the value to strtol(value, NULL, 0) etc. Shall we mention the new syntax support in that section of the guide? I'll the man page too. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no writes: > Replace ldap_utf8_strchr with ldap_utf8_strpbrk and it should work. ..and come to think of, it, the *s non-null test in the for loop should be unnecessary. -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by hyc＠symas.com 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: > quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org writes: >> utf-8.c:char * (ldap_utf8_strchr)( const char *str, const char *chr ) >> >> I.e., string, character, as normal libc functions. >> >> However, at line 125 in charray.c, it is called as: >> if ( ldap_utf8_strchr( brkstr, s ) != NULL ) { >> This order appears to be incorrect. > No. That code counts the number of delimiters characters in the > string being split. Since brkstr can contain several characters, > the loop checks each "utf-8 character" in str against brkstr. The code was certainly broken, regardless. If the input string uses any UTF8 characters beyond 0x7f then the simple increment of "s++" would yield invalid characters for most of the iterations of the loop. -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

Duh, perhaps I should have paid attention to the committed patch instead of your description of the problem... The patch breaks in a different way than I said. Replace ldap_utf8_strchr with ldap_utf8_strpbrk and it should work. I probably can't test it today. -- Hallvard

1 0

ITS#5695
by tamburo＠studenti.unina.it 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

This is the rights statement for my patch. This is the link http://www.studenti.unina.it/~tamburo/tesi/openldap/Luca-Tamburo-AC-08-09-1… to my patch with the following rights statement. This patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Luca Tamburo at ICAR, Branch of Naples, Italy. Luca Tamburo has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Luca Tamburo am authorized by Giovanni Schmid, project manager at ICAR, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Copyright 2008 Luca Tamburo tamburo(a)studenti.unina.it Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. Regards, Luca ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by quanah＠zimbra.com 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

--On September 30, 2008 6:20:58 PM +0000 h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: > quanah(a)zimbra.com writes: >> Yes. The calling order was incorrect. It is supposed to be >> ldap_utf8_strchr(s, brkstr). > > No. Try this with the new code: > env LDAPHOST='host1 host2' valgrind clients/tools/ldapwhoami -x > It returns writes past malloced areas in ldap_str2charray(). > > options.c calls ldap_charray("host1 host2", ", ") to parse that. > It counted the number of commas and spaces in the host string. > With the new code, it instead sums up: > > number of commas in "host1 host2" > + number of commas in "ost1 host2" > + number of commas in "st1 host2" > > etc and you never count spaces. So, the solution is to revert the order of the call, but leave the loop the way it is now? --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: ITS#5707 [Fwd: Re: 4.7.25 deadlock]
by quanah＠zimbra.com 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

--On September 30, 2008 6:13:05 PM +0000 quanah(a)zimbra.com wrote: > I think their patch is broken. I rebuilt BDB 4.7 with it, and now > test008 fails on me: Never mind, test008 fails without the patch to BDB 4.7 as well, so it's not related. test008 simply no longer works for me with current RE24. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

quanah(a)zimbra.com writes: > Yes. The calling order was incorrect. It is supposed to be > ldap_utf8_strchr(s, brkstr). No. Try this with the new code: env LDAPHOST='host1 host2' valgrind clients/tools/ldapwhoami -x It returns writes past malloced areas in ldap_str2charray(). options.c calls ldap_charray("host1 host2", ", ") to parse that. It counted the number of commas and spaces in the host string. With the new code, it instead sums up: number of commas in "host1 host2" + number of commas in "ost1 host2" + number of commas in "st1 host2" etc and you never count spaces. > Also the outside loop was incorrect. True. -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: ITS#5707 [Fwd: Re: 4.7.25 deadlock]
by quanah＠zimbra.com 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

I think their patch is broken. I rebuilt BDB 4.7 with it, and now test008 fails on me: bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_LOCK_NOTGRANTED: Lock not granted (-30993) bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_LOCK_NOTGRANTED: Lock not granted (-30993) bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_LOCK_NOTGRANTED: Lock not granted (-30993) bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_LOCK_NOTGRANTED: Lock not granted (-30993) bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") <= bdb_dn2id: get failed: DB_LOCK_NOTGRANTED: Lock not granted (-30993) bdb_dn2entry("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") => bdb_dn2id("cn=james a jones 4,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com") --Quanah > --On September 26, 2008 6:27:45 AM +0000 hyc(a)symas.com wrote: > >> So I guess we have to warn people about this one ourselves for a while. >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: 4.7.25 deadlock >> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:15:31 -0700 >> From: Michael Ubell <@oracle.com> >> To: Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> >> >> Howard, >> >> Generally we only post critical patches (data corruption, etc) to the >> web site. Since this one only effects those using user defined locks >> and does no damage, I don't think it will be posted. >> >> Mike >> >> >> -- >> -- Howard Chu >> CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com >> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ >> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ >> >> > > > > -- > > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Engineer > Zimbra, Inc > -------------------- > Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration > > -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by quanah＠zimbra.com 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

--On September 30, 2008 11:18:04 AM +0000 h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: > quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org writes: >> utf-8.c:char * (ldap_utf8_strchr)( const char *str, const char *chr ) >> >> I.e., string, character, as normal libc functions. >> >> However, at line 125 in charray.c, it is called as: >> if ( ldap_utf8_strchr( brkstr, s ) != NULL ) { >> This order appears to be incorrect. > > No. That code counts the number of delimiters characters in the > string being split. Since brkstr can contain several characters, > the loop checks each "utf-8 character" in str against brkstr. Yes. The calling order was incorrect. It is supposed to be ldap_utf8_strchr(s, brkstr). Also the outside loop was incorrect. --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 30 Sep '08

30 Sep '08

quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org writes: > utf-8.c:char * (ldap_utf8_strchr)( const char *str, const char *chr ) > > I.e., string, character, as normal libc functions. > > However, at line 125 in charray.c, it is called as: > if ( ldap_utf8_strchr( brkstr, s ) != NULL ) { > This order appears to be incorrect. No. That code counts the number of delimiters characters in the string being split. Since brkstr can contain several characters, the loop checks each "utf-8 character" in str against brkstr. -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by quanah＠OpenLDAP.org 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

Err, line 195. --Quanah --On September 30, 2008 2:52:30 AM +0000 quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount > Version: 2.3, 2.4, HEAD > OS: NA > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (98.207.132.222) > > > The definition for ldap_utf8_strchr is: > > utf-8.c:char * (ldap_utf8_strchr)( const char *str, const char *chr ) > > I.e., string, character, as normal libc functions. > > However, at line 125 in charray.c, it is called as: > > if ( ldap_utf8_strchr( brkstr, s ) != NULL ) { > > This order appears to be incorrect. > > --Quanah > >

1 0

(ITS#5720) ldap_str2charray calls ldap_utf8_strchr incorrectly
by quanah＠OpenLDAP.org 29 Sep '08

29 Sep '08

Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount Version: 2.3, 2.4, HEAD OS: NA URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (98.207.132.222) The definition for ldap_utf8_strchr is: utf-8.c:char * (ldap_utf8_strchr)( const char *str, const char *chr ) I.e., string, character, as normal libc functions. However, at line 125 in charray.c, it is called as: if ( ldap_utf8_strchr( brkstr, s ) != NULL ) { This order appears to be incorrect. --Quanah

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs