https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9761
Issue ID: 9761
Summary: Inserting olcSyncrepl into a given index inserts at
the end
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
olcSyncrepl is marked "X-ORDERED 'VALUES'" but add_syncrepl() always adds the
new value at the end of the list. This breaks value deletes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9751
Issue ID: 9751
Summary: Delta-MPR resolution too eager to drop attribute
deletes
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review, replication
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
syncrepl_resolve_cb will completely drop an attribute delete (or the delete
part of replace) if there's a "newer" (timestamp-wise) op touching the same
attribute.
This way servers processing the "out of order" write end up keeping values that
should have been removed (and have been on those that received it in the
natural order).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9779
Issue ID: 9779
Summary: dynlist Negation filter on memberOf attribute doesn't
work
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: mail(a)andrejro.de
Target Milestone: ---
Setup is according to documentation of slapo-dynlist to replace the old
memberOf overlay, which I only want to use for mapping static groupOfNames back
on memberOf= attributes of members.
dynlist-attrset groupOfNames labeledURI member+memberOf@groupOfNames
If I now have:
dn: cn=test,ou=Group,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: groupOfNames
objectClass: top
cn: test
member: uid=test,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
dn: uid=test,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: account
objectClass: top
cn: Test User
uid: test
dn: uid=test2,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: account
objectClass: top
cn: Test2 User
uid: test2
I expect for a search filter '(memberOf=cn=test,ou=Group,dc=example,dc=com)' to
return dn: "uid=test,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com" and for a search filter
'(!(memberOf=cn=test,ou=Group,dc=eample,dc=com)' to return dn:
"uid=test2,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"
First operation with a positive search filter works, but I cannot get the
second case to work, even when requesting the memberOf attribute explictly as
return attribute.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9770
Issue ID: 9770
Summary: slapo-constraint handling of deletion of multi-valued
configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Just like ITS#9493.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9764
Issue ID: 9764
Summary: slapo-valsort handling of deletion of multi-valued
configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Similar to ITS#9493.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9763
Issue ID: 9763
Summary: slapo-refint handling of deletion of multi-valued
configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Similar to ITS#9493.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9762
Issue ID: 9762
Summary: slapo-dyngroup handling of deletion of multi-valued
configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Similar to ITS#9493.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9759
Issue ID: 9759
Summary: olcRetcodeItem doesn't implement ordered values
correctly
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
olcRetcodeItem is marked X-ORDERED 'VALUES' so it has to handle ordered
inserts, which is currently not implemented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9756
Issue ID: 9756
Summary: syncprov_play_accesslog doesn't check minCSN properly
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
When asked to replay the accesslog database for a refresh delete, syncprov
doesn't interpret the minCSN data correctly, resulting in:
- an inaccurate refresh if a purge removed some important data in the meantime
- potentially a very expensive query when consumer is actually up to date
w.r.t. to some sids in our contextCSN
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9752
Issue ID: 9752
Summary: Improperly normalized minCSN values in accesslog
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The CSN matching rules require normalized values to be provided. When
normalized values are provided to attr_merge they must be distinct from the
regular values. accesslog.c:1982 is providing the same berval in both regular
and normalized value, which triggers an assert failure for this consistency
check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747
Issue ID: 9747
Summary: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for
groups
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.8
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: henson(a)acm.org
Target Milestone: ---
Given the following group:
dn: uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu
objectClass: groupOfNames
objectClass: cppGroup
objectClass: posixGroup
uid: unxadmin
cn: Unix Administrators
gidNumber: 17730
member:
member: uid=gkuri,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu
member: uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu
memberUid: gkuri
memberUid: henson
and the following dynlist config:
dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames
ldap compare operations checking group membership fail erroneously:
# ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/
uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu
FALSE
If the dynlist-attrset configuration is removed, the compare works as expected:
# ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/
uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu
TRUE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749
Issue ID: 9749
Summary: logoldattr documentation is misleading
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Reading the accesslog manpage, someone might expect that attributes specified
in logoldattr would be logged regardless of whether the entry being modified
matches any of the configured filters. This is not the case and should be
clarified.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9707
Issue ID: 9707
Summary: Documentation synchronisation ODSEE --> openldap
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: laurent.revillion(a)icloud.com
Target Milestone: ---
There is no documentation about the synchronisation between ODSEE and Openldap
2.5.
Will there be one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9766
Issue ID: 9766
Summary: slapo-autogroup handling of X-VALUES ORDERED is
incorrect
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
When adding a value to the beginning of the list (position {0}), internally, it
gets added to the end instead, this is incorrect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9777
Issue ID: 9777
Summary: Happy new year
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: orel(a)melix.net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 868
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=868&action=edit
2021 changed to 2022 on copyright
Just bump the year to 2022
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781
Issue ID: 9781
Summary: regression test its4448 assertion
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Starting with OpenLDAP 2.5, the ITS4448 regression case no longer passes and
instead triggers an assertion:
slapd: request.c:1672: ldap_find_request_by_msgid: Assertion `lr->lr_refcnt ==
0' failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9760
Issue ID: 9760
Summary: back-wt is not set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN"
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp
Target Milestone: ---
https://github.com/osstech-jp/openldap/issues/10
yasumatk says:
> If "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" is not set for a backend database, the initialization process of the syncprov overlay reads all entries in the backend database.
As a result, slapd startup time will increase on the back-wt database with a
large number of entries.
So, back-wt should be set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" in back-wt/init.c.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9753
Issue ID: 9753
Summary: back-mdb index incorrect on modify/replace
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
When doing a modify/replace on an indexed attribute, back-mdb only deletes the
old values from the index and doesn't add the new values into the index.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783
Issue ID: 9783
Summary: Error ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: raphael.santos(a)enkel.com.br
Target Milestone: ---
Hello everyone, everything good?
I'm having trouble making my migration.
I'm migrating from the OUD tool to Openldap, but when I export a user from the
OUD it comes with the password key SSHA512, and when I import it into Openldap
it can't decrypt, I've read several forums but so far without success. I tried
to import the module slapd-sha2.so, pw-sha2.so.
Does anyone have any tips?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6097
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.6.1 |2.6.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7080
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 67f7f98c
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T18:31:32+00:00
ITS#7080 Fix debug message
• a6c110d1
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T18:31:32+00:00
ITS#7080 cn=config postread support for modrdn when back-ldif not used
RE26:
• 4bf68b2c
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T23:08:53+00:00
ITS#7080 Fix debug message
• 441d54ad
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T23:08:59+00:00
ITS#7080 cn=config postread support for modrdn when back-ldif not used
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8039
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 6ccc0974
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T16:46:09+00:00
ITS#8039 Free resinfo even if opcookie is the last owner
re26:
• c1f4072c
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T23:07:06+00:00
ITS#8039 Free resinfo even if opcookie is the last owner
re25:
• cbc06de6
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T23:07:47+00:00
ITS#8039 Free resinfo even if opcookie is the last owner
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5972
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
head:
• 4b18c2be
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T03:34:27+00:00
ITS#5972 Consider all deletes for syncInfo messages
RE26:
• 329c92bd
by OndÅ™ej KuznÃk at 2022-01-18T23:00:30+00:00
ITS#5972 Consider all deletes for syncInfo messages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7239
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |PARTIAL
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.