- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 10333] New: Recurring crash in lmdb:mdb_page_alloc()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10333 Issue ID: 10333 Summary: Recurring crash in lmdb:mdb_page_alloc() Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.29 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: captgol2000(a)yahoo.com Target Milestone: --- Full_Name: Version: 0.9.29 OS: Vendor built Linux based on Ubuntu kernel 4.14.173 mdb_page_alloc (SIGBUS) Number of Events: 610 We have seen a recurring crash in lmdb:mdb_page_alloc() but only in the field with our product. One instance yielded a core in which we confirmed the same stack back trace when examined. It matches the automated backtrace reports we received from field deployments. The lmdb is built from source at version 0.9.29, unchanged from upstream. The operating environment is an embedded Linux appliance with Linux kernel at version "linux-4.14.173-aum-01" and our own application that uses lmdb to store certain data while transactions are in progress. We build everything with gcc 7.3.0 and link with glibc version 2.27. Unfortunately no in-house reproduction has been possible, only a number of matching stack traces from field reports of application crashes. We are working on some system tests to see if can can cause a reproduction. This report is in hopes some others may have seen a similar backtrace to help locate a bug. (gdb) where #0 mdb_page_alloc (num=num@entry=1, mp=mp@entry=0x7ffec216d120, mc=<optimized out>) at mdb.c:2310 #1 0x00007fa2508c764e in mdb_page_new (mc=mc@entry=0x7ffec216d670, flags=flags@entry=1, num=num@entry=1, mp=mp@entry=0x7ffec216d1d0) at mdb.c:7193 #2 0x00007fa2508c7a9b in mdb_page_split (mc=mc@entry=0x7ffec216d670, newkey=newkey@entry=0x7ffec216da70, newdata=newdata@entry=0x7ffec216da50, newpgno=newpgno@entry=18446744073709551615, nflags=0) at mdb.c:8649 #3 0x00007fa2508ca4ee in mdb_cursor_put (mc=0x7ffec216d670, key=0x7ffec216da70, data=0x7ffec216da50, flags=<optimized out>) at mdb.c:6957 #4 0x00007fa2508cc26a in mdb_put (txn=0xb767020, dbi=3, key=0x7ffec216da70, data=0x7ffec216da50, flags=0) at mdb.c:9045 #5 0x00007fa2520a69f4 in XXX_XXX_store::add (this=0x7fa25230ada0 <XXX_x509_validation_s::kv_store_h>, key=0x7ffec216dbc0 "\351\066\030\201\261\223\025\\q\006\204g:\274\241\330\377Ã ", keylen=20, value=0x7ffec216db20 "\002", valuelen=19, flag=<optimized out>, table=XXX_KV_STORE_TABLE_MAIN) at lib/XXX_kv_store.cpp:479 #6 0x00007fa2520a03fa in ?? () #7 0x00007ffec216dc60 in ?? () #8 0x00007ffec216dca8 in ?? () #9 0x00007ffec216dc60 in ?? () #10 0x00007fa2520a2990 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |2.6.11 Keywords|needs_review | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10334] New: When there is no entry in ldap db getting success response instead of noSuchObject
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '25

13 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Issue ID: 10334 Summary: When there is no entry in ldap db getting success response instead of noSuchObject Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: niranjan.ganjikunta(a)ericsson.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1065 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1065&action=edit noSuchobject overlay module Hi Team, We are hosting an LDAP server on an Ubuntu Linux system, and our requirement is to return a noSuchObject error in the LDAP response when a search yields no results, instead of returning a success response. we are using below search command. ldapsearch -b "ou=Subscribers,ou=sda,o=centertel.pl" -D "cn=admin" -w "XXXXX" -H ldap://ip:389 -v -s sub "ptkSubscriberIMSI=26003123456789" This command is trying to search for the imsi under the base dn by using the filter. in this case if there is no entry present in db we are expecting noSuchObject (32) response from ldap. We tried to build overlay by using below c++ script to modify the default ldap behaviour to get nosuchobject when there is no entry in db. #include "portable.h" // Required for OpenLDAP build environment #include <stdio.h> #include <ac/string.h> // OpenLDAP-specific replacements #include <ac/regex.h> // Brings in regex_t, regmatch_t #include <ldap.h> #include "slap.h" #include <stdio.h> #include <ldap.h> #include <slap.h> int my_overlay_search(Operation *op, SlapReply *rs) { // Correct call to next overlay/backend int rc = overlay_op_walk(op, rs, SLAP_OP_SEARCH, (slap_overinfo *)op->o_bd->bd_info, NULL); if (rs->sr_err == LDAP_SUCCESS && rs->sr_entry == NULL) { rs->sr_err = LDAP_NO_SUCH_OBJECT; rs->sr_text = "No such object found"; Debug(LDAP_DEBUG_ANY, "Custom overlay: noSuchObject error triggered\n"); } return rc; } and by using below command build .so file gcc -fPIC -shared \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/include" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/servers/slapd" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/libraries/libldap" \ -I "$OPENLDAP_SRC/libraries/liblber" \ -o "my_overlay.c" "noSuchobject_overlay.so" \ -lldap we didnt get any error while building the .so file. but while loading the module by using below ldif file content getting error dn: cn=module{0},cn=config changetype: modify add: olcModuleLoad olcModuleLoad: /usr/lib/ldap/noSuchobject_overlay.so config="/etc/ldap/ldap.conf" root@lodsto-essvt:~# ldapmodify -Q -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f new_load_overlay.ldif modifying entry "cn=module{0},cn=config" ldap_modify: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional info: <olcModuleLoad> handler exited with 1 and we got stuck in this module load. May be can you review and propose proper steps and script to build the required module to get expected ldap behaviour. Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10321] New: slapd garbles userCertificate hex code
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10321 Issue ID: 10321 Summary: slapd garbles userCertificate hex code Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jnabasny(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- I discovered an issue with how slapd handles hex encoded userCertificate;binary values while testing identical setups between FreeIPA and OpenLDAP. It seems to partially decode the hex, causing any search to fail. This was discovered when using SSSD, but is reproducible with ldapsearch. Essentially, you run a query like this using the hex encoded value of the certificate: ldapsearch -H ldap://10.10.0.94 -D cn=admin,dc=nabasny,dc=com -b "dc=nabasny,dc=com" -W '(&(userCertificate;binary=\30\82\04\85\30\82\02\ed\a0\03\02\01\02\02\01\0d\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\0b\05\00\30\37\31\15\30\13\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\0c\46\52\45\45\49\50\41\2e\48\4f\4d\45\31\1e\30\1c\06\03\55\04\03\0c\15\43\65\72\74\69\66\69\63\61\74\65\20\41\75\74\68\6f\72\69\74\79\30\1e\17\0d\32\35\30\33\32\30\31\35\34\35\32\36\5a\17\0d\32\37\30\33\32\31\31\35\34\35\32\36\5a\30\26\31\15\30\13\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\0c\46\52\45\45\49\50\41\2e\48\4f\4d\45\31\0d\30\0b\06\03\55\04\03\0c\04\6a\61\6b\65\30\82\01\22\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\01\05\00\03\82\01\0f\00\30\82\01\0a\02\82\01\01\00\b9\b2\3b\be\d1\20\bd\f2\ba\69\e6\b6\e5\2d\13\b0\77\a6\59\69\50\76\4c\07\71\ce\ee\8f\41\ef\04\20\1b\8e\a5\f7\8a\96\0d\f1\89\a5\84\cd\2f\be\ff\9c\2a\b2\bf\99\20\ca\ae\fc\a2\16\df\40\5b\d4\5e\7b\51\a5\b0\dd\bc\e9\c4\b1\e7\89\7c\25\f2\4b\b0\08\09\bd\60\58\c1\8f\af\fb\2a\5e\90\69\37\27\40\61\62\bb\7a\b8\76\18\11\96\2e\45\54\26\b0\c7\ec\92\3c\72\90\52\1a\44\0f\69\5c\b4\f1\98\53\4e\15\86\33\1a\81\ee\70\63\ae\e4\c7\32\7f\92\14\71\9d\58\c0\7d\a1\20\dc\f5\f6\47\29\45\56\bd\a2\dd\eb\4a\17\f2\2a\72\6f\fd\0f\a3\7e\a0\96\de\02\f3\b2\d9\ac\fc\af\38\c9\7a\21\c3\1b\19\4c\bc\d8\11\48\22\cf\18\ec\17\85\51\e9\51\22\49\aa\89\1a\73\2b\8d\40\e9\a9\3a\dd\e8\6e\9b\27\45\09\fd\a4\88\f5\7c\4e\96\b7\82\cd\f6\e2\1e\08\53\38\af\f9\4d\55\9c\79\0f\32\d8\bb\85\83\08\c0\b9\f3\39\7f\b9\7b\a9\02\03\01\00\01\a3\82\01\2b\30\82\01\27\30\1f\06\03\55\1d\23\04\18\30\16\80\14\0d\6b\b6\82\13\0c\a2\9d\91\01\40\e8\59\d6\2b\ec\87\1a\f0\36\30\3e\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\01\01\04\32\30\30\30\2e\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\30\01\86\22\68\74\74\70\3a\2f\2f\69\70\61\2d\63\61\2e\66\72\65\65\69\70\61\2e\68\6f\6d\65\2f\63\61\2f\6f\63\73\70\30\0e\06\03\55\1d\0f\01\01\ff\04\04\03\02\04\f0\30\1c\06\03\55\1d\25\04\15\30\13\06\08\2b\06\01\05\05\07\03\01\06\07\2b\06\01\05\02\03\05\30\77\06\03\55\1d\1f\04\70\30\6e\30\6c\a0\34\a0\32\86\30\68\74\74\70\3a\2f\2f\69\70\61\2d\63\61\2e\66\72\65\65\69\70\61\2e\68\6f\6d\65\2f\69\70\61\2f\63\72\6c\2f\4d\61\73\74\65\72\43\52\4c\2e\62\69\6e\a2\34\a4\32\30\30\31\0e\30\0c\06\03\55\04\0a\0c\05\69\70\61\63\61\31\1e\30\1c\06\03\55\04\03\0c\15\43\65\72\74\69\66\69\63\61\74\65\20\41\75\74\68\6f\72\69\74\79\30\1d\06\03\55\1d\0e\04\16\04\14\e8\11\4b\36\86\c9\7c\a2\d7\4e\ff\7c\13\89\2b\38\8d\c4\ec\32\30\0d\06\09\2a\86\48\86\f7\0d\01\01\0b\05\00\03\82\01\81\00\58\af\2b\7e\fd\05\b9\46\8a\c7\b9\e4\96\42\47\2d\8f\17\01\8e\58\30\95\9c\be\e7\2d\a8\22\64\5e\fd\f5\ec\46\97\2d\88\bc\06\b0\e7\a3\77\a3\d0\b6\da\01\4f\73\f4\3d\c9\47\49\e2\d0\a0\e8\bd\a9\62\fd\6c\de\81\32\9a\33\d5\58\57\d8\c9\47\54\78\fa\69\20\49\11\c9\dc\4f\f4\bc\37\63\28\6a\fd\e2\f7\4b\0f\44\26\90\6c\22\c9\b8\ff\9a\36\05\a3\24\3c\58\73\6f\4b\17\2d\e3\22\30\aa\34\4e\2f\36\24\94\6a\24\9b\bf\ac\e5\23\33\f6\3f\cf\c7\dd\38\91\85\63\c0\61\55\5f\de\2b\e6\3d\13\4f\8c\6a\6a\1e\3b\0e\4a\8c\e9\c3\46\ef\02\bb\63\b7\09\9f\d8\5c\67\4c\c6\40\8f\1e\7e\c8\f0\89\4c\8f\f8\24\63\42\31\f9\5d\5b\2d\cb\78\c3\94\5f\3e\ca\b8\7b\68\9a\6a\09\0c\22\bd\da\39\9f\b7\0f\4f\20\a9\1a\de\d7\8a\31\af\a3\ac\14\d1\ba\90\b8\22\56\31\b1\52\78\73\6f\36\05\88\0b\56\31\fd\55\89\7d\55\8b\01\1d\58\0c\75\03\bd\7c\7b\05\c7\86\15\90\0c\f4\c6\91\d3\f6\73\e9\8f\1f\25\88\32\b2\cb\53\db\91\e4\8b\28\a1\22\7a\38\ac\f5\8b\32\51\d4\9e\d6\e1\15\0d\fb\8f\60\09\e5\0c\dd\d4\19\fe\f7\44\cd\ac\ff\82\94\16\f5\7d\19\57\30\79\96\4b\7b\61\d0\b8\c3\0c\1c\2f\89\7e\01\5e\a0\95\9a\aa\d3\e2\6d\d5\fa\2e\e8\57\5a\b3\45\23\17\40\c9\d3\92\9e\11\cc\c4\31\f2\e5\94\e3\8f\5e\d9\51\92\cd\46\77\33\c8\4b\50\84\73)(objectclass=posixAccount)(uid=*)(&(uidNumber=*)(!(uidNumber=0))))' And slapd logs the query as: Mar 20 19:54:01 ldap slapd[457]: conn=1058 op=3 SRCH base="ou=people,dc=nabasny,dc=com" scope=2 deref=0 filter="(&(?userCertificate;binary=0\82\04\850\82\02\ED\A0\03\02\01\02\02\01\0D0\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\0B\05\00071\150\13\06\03U\04\0A\0C\0CFREEIPA.HOME1\1E0\1C\06\03U\04\03\0C\15Certificate Authority0\1E\17\0D250320154526Z\17\0D270321154526Z0&1\150\13\06\03U\04\0A\0C\0CFREEIPA.HOME1\0D0\0B\06\03U\04\03\0C\04jake0\82\01"0\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\01\05\00\03\82\01\0F\000\82\01\0A\02\82\01\01\00\B9\B2;\BE\D1 \BD\F2\BAi\E6\B6\E5-\13\B0w\A6YiPvL\07q\CE\EE\8FA\EF\04 \1B\8E\A5\F7\8A\96\0D\F1\89\A5\84\CD/\BE\FF\9C\2A\B2\BF\99 \CA\AE\FC\A2\16\DF@[\D4^{Q\A5\B0\DD\BC\E9\C4\B1\E7\89|%\F2K\B0\08\09\BD`X\C1\8F\AF\FB\2A^\90i7'@ab\BBz\B8v\18\11\96.ET&\B0\C7\EC\92<r\90R\1AD\0Fi\5C\B4\F1\98SN\15\863\1A\81\EEpc\AE\E4\C72\7F\92\14q\9DX\C0}\A1 \DC\F5\F6G\29EV\BD\A2\DD\EBJ\17\F2\2Aro\FD\0F\A3~\A0\96\DE\02\F3\B2\D9\AC\FC\AF8\C9z!\C3\1B\19L\BC\D8\11H"\CF\18\EC\17\85Q\E9Q"I\AA\89\1As+\8D@\E9\A9:\DD\E8n\9B'E\09\FD\A4\88\F5|N\96\B7\82\CD\F6\E2\1E\08S8\AF\F9MU\9Cy\0F2\D8\BB\85\83\08\C0\B9\F39\7F\B9{\A9\02\03\01\00\01\A3\82\01+0\82\01'0\1F\06\03U\1D#\04\180\16\80\14\0Dk\B6\82\13\0C\A2\9D\91\01@\E8Y\D6+\EC\87\1A\F060>\06\08+\06\01\05\05\07\01\01\042000.\06\08+\06\01\05\05\070\01\86"http://ipa-ca.freeipa.home/ca/ocsp0\0E\06\03U\1D\0F\01\01\FF\04\04\03\02\04… Authority0\1D\06\03U\1D\0E\04\16\04\14\E8\11K6\86\C9|\A2\D7N\FF|\13\89+8\8D\C4\EC20\0D\06\09\2A\86H\86\F7\0D\01\01\0B\05\00\03\82\01\81\00X\AF+~\FD\05\B9F\8A\C7\B9\E4\96BG-\8F\17\01\8EX0\95\9C\BE\E7-\A8"d^\FD\F5\ECF\97-\88\BC\06\B0\E7\A3w\A3\D0\B6\DA\01Os\F4=\C9GI\E2\D0\A0\E8\BD\A9b\FDl\DE\812\9A3\D5XW\D8\C9GTx\FAi I\11\C9\DCO\F4\BC7c\28j\FD\E2\F7K\0FD&\90l"\C9\B8\FF\9A6\05\A3$<XsoK\17-\E3"0\AA4N/6$\94j$\9B\BF\AC\E5#3\F6?\CF\C7\DD8\91\85c\C0aU_\DE+\E6=\13O\8Cjj\1E;\0EJ\8C\E9\C3F\EF\02\BBc\B7\09\9F\D8\5CgL\C6@\8F\1E~\C8\F0\89L\8F\F8$cB1\F9][-\CBx\C3\94_>\CA\B8{h\9Aj\09\0C"\BD\DA9\9F\B7\0FO \A9\1A\DE\D7\8A1\AF\A3\AC\14\D1\BA\90\B8"V1\B1Rxso6\05\88\0BV1\FDU\89}U\8B\01\1DX\0Cu\03\BD|{\05\C7\86\15\90\0C\F4\C6\91\D3\F6s\E9\8F\1F%\882\B2\CBS\DB\91\E4\8B\28\A1"z8\AC\F5\8B2Q\D4\9E\D6\E1\15\0D\FB\8F`\09\E5\0C\DD\D4\19\FE\F7D\CD\AC\FF\82\94\16\F5}\19W0y\96K{a\D0\B8\C3\0C\1C/\89~\01^\A0\95\9A\AA\D3\E2m\D5\FA.\E8WZ\B3E#\17@\C9\D3\92\9E\11\CC\C41\F2\E5\94\E3\8F^\D9Q\92\CDFw3\C8KP\84s)(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=*)(&(uidNumber=*)(!(uidNumber=0))))" Some of the hex has been decoded into readable strings, which causes the search to fail. Running the same search on FreeIPA with an identical user entry returns the entry correctly. I'm happy to provide more logs/details if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs_review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10326] New: SNI passing requirements differ across TLS implementations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 May '25

06 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10326 Issue ID: 10326 Summary: SNI passing requirements differ across TLS implementations Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- mbedtls 3.6.3 has changed behaviour to correct a long standing issue where not setting a hostname meant hostname checking was disabled completely (CVE-2025-27809). It seems that how we do SNI vs. basic certificate checking differs between TLS implementations and our logic in ldap_int_tls_connect and ti_session_connect. This is also the reason test067-tls started failing on mbedtls builds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10324] New: Grammar error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10324 Issue ID: 10324 Summary: Grammar error Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ron(a)return.sh Target Milestone: --- In the documentation, y'all have: Acknowledgments The OpenLDAP Project is comprised of a team of volunteers. This document would not be possible without their contribution of time and energy. Either "comprises" or "composed of" should be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #5 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- Thank you Matt, I have tried using mingw32 and mingw64 under MSYS2 environment. Using mingw32 and mingw64 fails during the configure step. Error while running mingw32: configure: error: IPv6 support requires getaddrinfo() and inet_ntop() Error with mingw64: Unable to load winsock.h and winsock2.h files as they collide with linux based socket libraries under sys folders. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Hardin <mhardin(a)symas.com> --- Hello, Yes, I have confirmed that there are issues building OpenLDAP under MSYS2 with --enable-ipv6. What environment are you building under? Thanks, -Matt > On Apr 24, 2025, at 3:03 AM, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: > > https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 > > --- Comment #3 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- > Hi Matt > I have tried building OpenLDAP 2.6.9 version with flag enable-ipv6 flag for > Windows environment, but failed to do so successfully. Is it a valid ticket? > can you please confirm if we support openldap+ipv6 on Windows? > > Thanks > Dhiraj > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6938] Windows IPv6 support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6938 --- Comment #3 from Dhiraj Giria <dhiraj.giria(a)mitel.com> --- Hi Matt I have tried building OpenLDAP 2.6.9 version with flag enable-ipv6 flag for Windows environment, but failed to do so successfully. Is it a valid ticket? can you please confirm if we support openldap+ipv6 on Windows? Thanks Dhiraj -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7981] Feature request: Crypt scheme in pwdPolicy
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Apr '25

15 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7981 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10254 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7981] Feature request: Crypt scheme in pwdPolicy
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Apr '25

15 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7981 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/763 Gone with another auxiliary objectclass but rereading the conversation, I guess I'll adjust to use a subclass later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10322] New: Retire 2.4 admin guide
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Issue ID: 10322 Summary: Retire 2.4 admin guide Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- 2.4 release stream has been dead for a while now however its Admin Guide is still in place, we should remove it and possibly have links under it 301 to admin26? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '25

26 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1059|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 --- Comment #3 from requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> --- Created attachment 1060 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1060&action=edit slapschema-continuemode-and-preserve-rc.patch This extended version of the patch additionally preserves a non-zero return code even in combination with the option "-c". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7901] slapschema reports error but returns 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7901 --- Comment #2 from requate(a)univention.de <requate(a)univention.de> --- Created attachment 1059 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1059&action=edit slapschema-continuemode.patch If the last object checked by entry_schema_check() has a problem, then slapschema returns the error code of that problem. But if there is a good object check after that, then it returns 0. That is not ideal. The tool offers the option "-c" to activate a "continuemode". The man page states "Enable continue (ignore errors) mode" and it is a bit surprising that the default behavior is different for the the return code of the main check. Also, while the message `# (65) Object class violation: unrecognized objectClass 'foo'` is output to stdout, the messages `67e293be UNKNOWN attributeDescription "BAR" inserted.` are actually output to stderr. They seem related, maybe it would be more consistent to output them to the same channel. The attached patch just proposes to exit the check loop in case entry_schema_check() fails and the option "-c" was not given. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10316] New: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10316 Issue ID: 10316 Summary: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling() Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)konink.de Target Milestone: --- I am developing ETL software in Python and I am using lmdb as backend. For this I am using https://github.com/jnwatson/py-lmdb In this big process I am resizing the map_size dynamically. I would say it is certainly possible that I am reading at the same time. I end up in the following error: build/lib/mdb.c:5882: Assertion 'IS_BRANCH(mc->mc_pg[mc->mc_top])' failed in mdb_cursor_sibling() I ran my application again with a predetermined map size, and it did not assert. Since it is a single shot, I don't know if I can be certain that it therefore does not happen. When searching for it I found the following issue from 2017, suggesting it can be reproduced when running the performance test. https://github.com/bnclabs/dbperf/issues/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- No OpenLDAP issue seen. Use proper file limit settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10315] Re-Usage of Message IDs of async search blocks all available connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10315 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|OpenLDAP-devs | Keywords|needs_review | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10318] New: Potential null-pointer-dereference in servers/slapd/connection.c
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10318 Issue ID: 10318 Summary: Potential null-pointer-dereference in servers/slapd/connection.c Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1367173408(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1056 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1056&action=edit execution trace Hi, I have found a potential null pointer dereference bug in the project and would like to report it to the maintainers. At line 267 and line 284 in file `servers/slapd/connection.c`, the function `connection_get` may return NULL. Then, at line 1239 in the same file, the pointer `c` receives the return value, which may be NULL. But `c` is dereferenced at following lines without checking, which may lead to a null-pointer-dereference bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10317] New: Potential null-pointer-dereference
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10317 Issue ID: 10317 Summary: Potential null-pointer-dereference Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1367173408(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1055 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1055&action=edit execution trace Hi, I have found a potential null pointer dereference bug in the project and would like to report it to the maintainers. At line 836 in file `servers/slapd/backglue.c`, the function `glue_tool_inst` may return NULL. Then, at line 765 in the same file, the pointer `on` receives the return value, which may be NULL. But `on` is dereferenced at line 766 without checking, which may lead to a null-pointer-dereference bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10310] New: Update pbkdf2 overlay so iterations can be configurable
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10310 Issue ID: 10310 Summary: Update pbkdf2 overlay so iterations can be configurable Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The pbkdf2 password hashing contrib overlay has the number of iterations hard coded at 10,000. It would be helpful to update the module to allow this to be configurable instead, as is done with other password hashing modules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10305] New: pkg-config should be used to find cyrus-sasl
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Feb '25

25 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10305 Issue ID: 10305 Summary: pkg-config should be used to find cyrus-sasl Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hi(a)alyssa.is Target Milestone: --- Static libraries do not encode their dependencies, so dependencies have to be discovered using pkg-config or another equivalent mechanism. OpenLDAP does not use pkg-config to find cyrus-sasl, which means that even if a working static cyrus-sasl library is available, it won't be used, because OpenLDAP's build system won't know to link its dependency libraries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Feb '25

19 Feb '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |FIXED --- Comment #23 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE26: • d66062dc by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:37:48+00:00 ITS#7249 Let backend_attribute know who's calling it • 5c734d2b by Ondřej Kuzník at 2025-02-19T18:37:53+00:00 ITS#7249 Disallow memberof-addcheck when memberof is global -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs