- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 10353] New: No TLS connection on Windows because of missing ENOTCONN in socket.h
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10353 Issue ID: 10353 Summary: No TLS connection on Windows because of missing ENOTCONN in socket.h Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.10 Hardware: All OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: julien.wadel(a)belledonne-communications.com Target Milestone: --- On Windows, the TLS connection cannot be done and we get the connection error: Can't contact LDAP server. => Connections are done with WSAGetLastError(). After getting WSAEWOULDBLOCK, the connection is not restart because of the state WSAENOTCONN that is not known. OpenLDAP use ENOTCONN that is set to 126 by "ucrt/errno.h" while WSAENOTCONN is 10057L. Adding #define ENOTCONN WSAENOTCONN like for EWOULDBLOCK resolve the issue. Reference commit on external project: https://gitlab.linphone.org/BC/public/external/openldap/-/commit/62fbfb12e8… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 10352] New: minor: Improve documentation of option "-n" for ldapdelete
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10352 Issue ID: 10352 Summary: minor: Improve documentation of option "-n" for ldapdelete Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: u.windl(a)ukr.de Target Milestone: --- The documentation for option "-n" in ldapdelete says: "Show what would be done, but don't actually delete entries. Useful for debugging in conjunction with -v." However using option "-n" without option "-v" does not output anything! So the description should be improved, or "-n" should implicitly enable option "-v". Specifically it's not obvious what "Useful for debugging in conjunction with -v." refers to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10350] New: Free ch_calloc-allocated memory in error paths
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10350 Issue ID: 10350 Summary: Free ch_calloc-allocated memory in error paths Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: alexguo1023(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1079 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1079&action=edit Free ch_calloc-allocated memory in error paths 1. In aa_operational, bv_allowed and bv_effective are allocated via ch_calloc. If ja == 0 or je == 0, these memory objects are never freed and do not escape the function, causing potential memory leak. 2. In memberof_db_init, the memory allocated by ch_calloc isn’t released on error paths, leading to another potential leak. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10351] New: olcSaslHost lacks default value
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10351 Issue ID: 10351 Summary: olcSaslHost lacks default value Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: fredrik(a)falk-net.se Target Milestone: --- I'm trying to configure multi-master replication with SASL for cn=config and some other databases. However, I'm running into an issue with GSSAPI/SASL as it also syncs olcSaslHost, which has to be unique to each host in order to work. I'd like if olcSaslHost was left empty then it'd default to the hostname/FQDN of the host running slapd, which would resolve the issue. This issue has been encountered before: https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201508/msg00124.html https://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201001/msg00048.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 6083] ppolicy should also support invocation of an external password checker
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6083 --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:59:16AM +0000, openldap-its(a)openldap.org wrote: > PS: and I would like to check, if a password is compromised. I already have an > external checker for this. It just needs an interface to OpenLDAP. Information > about compromised passwords and it's importance can be found at > https://haveibeenpwned.com/ Hi Heiko, if that's what you need, you could write your own policy checker wrapper. If you feel you can design an interface fit for wider use, you can even submit it for inclusion and it will be considered. But remember the slapd-sock overlay exists already and should be able to intercept the password change just fine if you don't need access to the rest of the entry being changed. Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10329] New: Additional issues with pcache, and a test
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10329 Issue ID: 10329 Summary: Additional issues with pcache, and a test Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: aweits(a)rit.edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1062 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1062&action=edit test & patches Hello again! Further testing revealed some more issues in pcache [re: ITS#10270]. I've attached an update to test020-proxycache as well. These are based off the current git HEAD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 6083] ppolicy should also support invocation of an external password checker
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6083 --- Comment #4 from Heiko Zelt <hz(a)heikozelt.de> --- PS: and I would like to check, if a password is compromised. I already have an external checker for this. It just needs an interface to OpenLDAP. Information about compromised passwords and it's importance can be found at https://haveibeenpwned.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6083] ppolicy should also support invocation of an external password checker
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 04 Jun '25

04 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6083 --- Comment #3 from Heiko Zelt <hz(a)heikozelt.de> --- I need this feature too. I would like to check if passwords contain only ASCII characters, and a minimum of one uppercase, lowercase, digit and special character. An external password syntax checker would be the most flexible solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10303] New: Web site still presents the 2.5 version as LTS
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '25

27 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10303 Issue ID: 10303 Summary: Web site still presents the 2.5 version as LTS Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: elecharny(a)apache.org Target Milestone: --- The OpenLDAP web site still indicates that the OpenLDAP 2.5 version is the LTS, despite a mail announced on August 10, 2024 that starting from January 2025 teh 2.6 branch will be the LTS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10288] New: autoca Attribute olcAutoCAserverClass
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10288 Issue ID: 10288 Summary: autoca Attribute olcAutoCAserverClass Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- I try to add the autoca overlay with the following ldif: -------------- dn: olcOverlay=autoca,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcAutoCAConfig objectClass: olcOverlayConfig olcOverlay: autoca olcAutoCADays: 3652 olcAutoCAKeybits: 4096 olcAutoCAserverClass: ipHost olcAutoCAserverDays: 1826 olcAutoCAserverKeybits: 4096 olcAutoCAuserClass: person olcAutoCAuserDays: 365 olcAutoCAuserKeybits: 4096 -------------- ldapadd gives me: adding new entry "olcOverlay=autoca,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config" ldap_add: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional info: <olcAutoCAserverClass> handler exited with 1 If I remove the attribute from my ldif, it works. What is wrong with the olcAutoCAserverClass attribute in my ldif? I try to look it up in the admin handbook but I could not find anything. I looked in the source code and found: ------------ { "serverClass", "objectclass", 2, 2, 0, ARG_STRING|ARG_MAGIC|ACA_SRVCLASS, autoca_cf, "( OLcfgOvAt:22.2 NAME 'olcAutoCAserverClass' " "DESC 'ObjectClass of server entries' " "EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL }, ------------ For me it looks the same as the attribute olcAutoCAuserclass. ------------- { "userClass", "objectclass", 2, 2, 0, ARG_STRING|ARG_MAGIC|ACA_USRCLASS, autoca_cf, "( OLcfgOvAt:22.1 NAME 'olcAutoCAuserClass' " "DESC 'ObjectClass of user entries' " "EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL }, ------------- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10336] New: slapd crashes with segfault in mdb_delete.c on non-existent tree part deletion
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Issue ID: 10336 Summary: slapd crashes with segfault in mdb_delete.c on non-existent tree part deletion Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: A.Asemov(a)edpnet.com Target Milestone: --- slapd crashes with segfault in mdb_delete.c on non-existent tree part deletion. Applies to 2.6.7, 2.6.8, 2.6.9 ---------- Prerequisites: ---------- - mdb backend - empty mdb database ---------- Sample reproducer: ---------- ldapdelete -x -H ldap://127.0.0.1 -w "password" -D "cn=MyApplication,dc=Contacts,dc=MyTree" "dc=Contacts,dc=MyTree" ---------- Expected behavior: ---------- ldap_delete: No such object (32) ---------- Actual behavior: ---------- Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00005566507b96e0 in mdb_delete (op=0x7f3f0c002910, rs=0x7f3f19bfd8a0) at ../../../../openldap-epel-2.6.8/openldap-2.6.8/servers/slapd/back-mdb/delete.c:151 ---------- Sample slapd.conf: ---------- include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema include /etc/openldap/schema/openldap.schema allow bind_v2 pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args modulepath /usr/lib64/openldap #moduleload back_shell.la moduleload sssvlv.la moduleload valsort.la TLSCACertificatePath /etc/openldap/certs TLSCertificateFile /etc/<path removed>.crt TLSCertificateKeyFile /etc/<path removed>.key database mdb suffix "dc=Contacts,dc=MyTree" directory "/var/lib/ldap" checkpoint 1024 1 dbnosync maxsize 1048576000 index objectClass eq,pres index ou,cn eq,pres,sub index uidNumber,gidNumber eq,pres index uid eq,pres,sub rootdn "cn=MyApplication,dc=Contacts,dc=MyTree" rootpw "{SSHA}<removed>" access to * by dn="cn=Phone,dc=Contacts,dc=MyTree" read by peername.ip=127.0.0.1 write by anonymous auth by * none overlay sssvlv sssvlv-max 1000 sssvlv-maxperconn 1000 ---------- Sample fix: I am not versed in OpenLDAP code so I can't tell if it's semantically correct. Seems like "e" gets NULL in this piece of code and the piece of code does not verify if "e" is NULL. Adding check for ( e ) makes slapd correctly return ldap_delete: No such object (32) instead of segfaulting. ---------- --- a/servers/slapd/back-mdb/delete.c 2024-05-21 19:19:11.000000000 +0200 +++ b/servers/slapd/back-mdb/delete.c 2025-05-12 14:43:04.652396852 +0200 @@ -148,17 +148,19 @@ "<=- " LDAP_XSTRING(mdb_delete) ": no such object %s\n", op->o_req_dn.bv_val ); - rs->sr_matched = ch_strdup( e->e_dn ); - if ( is_entry_referral( e )) { - BerVarray ref = get_entry_referrals( op, e ); - rs->sr_ref = referral_rewrite( ref, &e->e_name, - &op->o_req_dn, LDAP_SCOPE_DEFAULT ); - ber_bvarray_free( ref ); - } else { - rs->sr_ref = NULL; + if ( e ) { + rs->sr_matched = ch_strdup( e->e_dn ); + if ( is_entry_referral( e )) { + BerVarray ref = get_entry_referrals( op, e ); + rs->sr_ref = referral_rewrite( ref, &e->e_name, + &op->o_req_dn, LDAP_SCOPE_DEFAULT ); + ber_bvarray_free( ref ); + } else { + rs->sr_ref = NULL; + } + mdb_entry_return( op, e ); + e = NULL; } - mdb_entry_return( op, e ); - e = NULL; rs->sr_err = LDAP_REFERRAL; rs->sr_flags = REP_MATCHED_MUSTBEFREED | REP_REF_MUSTBEFREED; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10290] New: Combination of syncrepl+rwm+syncprov frees the wrong modlist
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Issue ID: 10290 Summary: Combination of syncrepl+rwm+syncprov frees the wrong modlist Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- An MPR setup with rwm enabled (regardless of configuration it seems) will crash with the provided modlist being freed twice. This is the sequence of events of what is stored in op->orm_modlist, allocated and freed by whom, replacing the actual pointers to make it easier to track: syncrepl_message_to_op: preparing a modify with 0xoriginal syncrepl_op_modify: old modlist 0xoriginal replacing with 0xsyncrepl_op_modify rwm_op_modify: old modlist 0xsyncrepl_op_modify replacing with 0xrwm_op_modify <modify happens> syncrepl_modify_cb: freeing 0xsyncrepl_op_modify, replacing with 0xoriginal (forgetting 0xrwm_op_modify) rwm_op_rollback: freeing 0xoriginal replacing with 0xsyncrepl_op_modify syncrepl_message_to_op: went in with 0xoriginal, got 0xsyncrepl_op_modify back syncrepl_message_to_op: freeing 0xsyncrepl_op_modify Not sure who is at fault: syncrepl_modify_cb is the one freeing the wrong modlist, but then if backover were to work with an actual "stack", running response callbacks in the opposite order from the request, things would have been ok too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 7249] slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10302] New: Double free of idcursor
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10302 Issue ID: 10302 Summary: Double free of idcursor Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.rupf(a)lzlabs.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1050 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1050&action=edit proposed patch, which was created from current master, but also applies to 2.6.6 While switching from Oracle Linux (a RHEL clone) 8 to 9 one of our larger LDAP samples started causing a double free error at the end of the slapadd run. While I can't share the LDIF in question and it didn't consistently cause the issue, only every 5-6 times it ran, I could ran gdb and valgrind on it and suggest the attached patch that resolves that error to re-occur. I validated the patch still applies to the current master branch of openldap, as well as to 2.6.6 on EL9 where we encountered this. The error originally observed was this (commands being run as ldap user): [...] rm -r /var/lib/ldap mkdir /var/lib/ldap slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTPROFILECOUNT" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTGLOBALPROFILECOUNT" inserted. -#################### 100.00% eta none elapsed 03s spd 4.2 M/s Closing DB...double free or corruption (!prev) Under valgrind, the following trace could be observed: valgrind --vgdb=full --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all --track-origins=yes slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 ==502== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==502== Copyright (C) 2002-2024, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==502== Using Valgrind-3.23.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==502== Command: slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 ==502== PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTPROFILECOUNT" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTGLOBALPROFILECOUNT" inserted. ==502== Invalid read of size 8 ==502== at 0x1E65A9: mdb_cursor_close (mdb.c:7764) ==502== by 0x1F71B8: UnknownInlinedFun (tools.c:202) ==502== by 0x1F71B8: mdb_tool_entry_close (tools.c:152) ==502== by 0x1D8291: slapadd (slapadd.c:511) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) ==502== Address 0x188c8af8 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 392 free'd ==502== at 0x4847B4C: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:989) ==502== by 0x22CEFE: mdb_cursors_close.isra.0 (mdb.c:2638) ==502== by 0x1EBAAE: mdb_txn_commit (mdb.c:3640) ==502== by 0x1F75E2: mdb_tool_entry_modify (tools.c:1066) ==502== by 0x1D9AF9: slap_tool_update_ctxcsn.part.0 (slapcommon.c:1069) ==502== by 0x1D8440: UnknownInlinedFun (slapcommon.c:962) ==502== by 0x1D8440: slapadd (slapadd.c:502) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) ==502== Block was alloc'd at ==502== at 0x484482F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:446) ==502== by 0x1E8699: mdb_cursor_open (mdb.c:7690) ==502== by 0x1F8C45: mdb_tool_entry_put (tools.c:707) ==502== by 0x1D8150: slapadd (slapadd.c:453) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) [...] Please advise if I can provide any further diagnostics, while I can still relatively easily reproduce the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10168] New: olcdbindex doesn't cleanup cleanly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10168 Issue ID: 10168 Summary: olcdbindex doesn't cleanup cleanly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- if you run the following modify against slapd (notice the olcDbMultival data is wrong), slapd aborts in mdb_cf_cleanup->mdb_attr_dbs_open when cleaning up the olcDbIndex changes: dn: olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config changetype: modify add: olcDbIndex olcDbIndex: member eq olcDbIndex: memberof eq - add: olcDbMultival olcDbMultival: member,memberOf 5,15 - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 10299] New: slapacl -u segfaults on nonexistent user
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10299 Issue ID: 10299 Summary: slapacl -u segfaults on nonexistent user Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ratness(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1048 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1048&action=edit config.ldif 2.6.9, symas-packaged RPMs, Rocky 9. In slapacl, a rootDN user is, as you'd expect, allowed to do anything: # /opt/symas/sbin/slapacl -D 'cn=Manager,dc=example,dc=com' -u -b 'uid=fakeuser,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com' entry/write authcDN: "cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com" write access to entry: ALLOWED But, a user given full-manage rights, segfaults: # /opt/symas/sbin/slapacl -D 'uid=direct,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com' -u -b 'uid=fakeuser,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com' entry/write authcDN: "uid=direct,ou=users,dc=example,dc=com" Segmentation fault (core dumped) Traceback: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7135888 in mdb_txn_begin (env=0x0, parent=parent@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=131072, ret=ret@entry=0x5555557f4940) at ./../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:2893 2893 flags |= env->me_flags & MDB_WRITEMAP; Missing separate debuginfos, use: dnf debuginfo-install glibc-2.34-60.el9.x86_64 libevent-2.1.12-6.el9.x86_64 sqlite-libs-3.34.1-6.el9_1.x86_64 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff7135888 in mdb_txn_begin (env=0x0, parent=parent@entry=0x0, flags=flags@entry=131072, ret=ret@entry=0x5555557f4940) at ./../../../libraries/liblmdb/mdb.c:2893 #1 0x00007ffff71361a1 in mdb_opinfo_get (op=op@entry=0x7fffffffdce0, mdb=mdb@entry=0x7ffff7048010, rdonly=rdonly@entry=1, moip=moip@entry=0x7fffffffc410) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/back-mdb/id2entry.c:793 #2 0x00007ffff7136459 in mdb_entry_get (op=0x7fffffffdce0, ndn=0x7fffffffc640, oc=0x5555557a4360, at=0x5555557c3560, rw=0, ent=0x7fffffffc4c8) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/back-mdb/id2entry.c:620 #3 0x00005555555a77a0 in be_entry_get_rw (e=0x7fffffffc4c8, rw=0, at=0x5555557c3560, oc=0x5555557a4360, ndn=0x7fffffffc640, op=0x7fffffffdce0) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/backend.c:1438 #4 fe_acl_group (op=0x7fffffffdce0, target=<optimized out>, gr_ndn=0x7fffffffc640, op_ndn=0x7fffffffde10, group_oc=0x5555557a4360, group_at=0x5555557c3560) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/backend.c:1494 #5 0x000055555559ec5c in backend_group (op=0x7fffffffdce0, target=<optimized out>, gr_ndn=<optimized out>, op_ndn=<optimized out>, group_oc=<optimized out>, group_at=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/backend.c:1690 #6 0x00005555555bfbc2 in slap_acl_mask (access=ACL_WRITE, state=0x7fffffffc660, count=1, matches=0x7fffffffcab0, val=<optimized out>, desc=<optimized out>, e=0x7fffffffd910, op=0x7fffffffdce0, mask=<synthetic pointer>, prev=0x0, a=0x5555557c3970) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/acl.c:1643 #7 slap_access_allowed (op=op@entry=0x7fffffffdce0, e=e@entry=0x7fffffffd910, desc=<optimized out>, val=<optimized out>, access=<optimized out>, state=<optimized out>, maskp=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/acl.c:288 #8 0x00005555555c1e2e in fe_access_allowed (op=0x7fffffffdce0, e=0x7fffffffd910, desc=<optimized out>, val=<optimized out>, access=<optimized out>, state=<optimized out>, maskp=0x7fffffffd828) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/acl.c:352 #9 0x00005555555b7c74 in access_allowed_mask (op=0x7fffffffdce0, e=0x7fffffffd910, desc=0x55555573d540, val=<optimized out>, access=ACL_WRITE, state=0x0, maskp=0x7fffffffd900) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/acl.c:456 #10 0x0000555555620182 in slapacl (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fffffffe398) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/slapacl.c:362 #11 0x000055555557658f in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/symas-openldap-2.6.9-1.el9.x86_64/servers/slapd/main.c:540 I could understand it if it was a case of "trying to verify cn/write and not knowing if the user was objectClass=person" but for entry/write I don't see any reason these should be different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 14

[Issue 10325] New: Variant uses overlays OID instead of contrib OID (OLcfgOvAt instead of OLcfgCtAt) for configuration attributes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10325 Issue ID: 10325 Summary: Variant uses overlays OID instead of contrib OID (OLcfgOvAt instead of OLcfgCtAt) for configuration attributes Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- The variant contrib overlay uses the wrong base OID for its attributes, which leads to OID duplication with DDS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10312] New: olcSubordinate does not accept a 'false' keyword, contrary to documentation
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10312 Issue ID: 10312 Summary: olcSubordinate does not accept a 'false' keyword, contrary to documentation Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gray(a)nxg.name Target Milestone: --- The slapd-config(5) manpage documents the olcSubordinate keyword as olcSubordinate: [TRUE | FALSE | advertise] If, however, I try to create a database using olcSubordinate: false then slapadd objects with olcSubordinate: value #0: suffix "ou=foo,o=bar": subordinate must be "TRUE" or "advertise". (For the sake of completeness, it might be worth noting in the manpage that the (unsurprising) default is for a search of a superior database _not_ to be propagated to the subordinate one – ie, the presumed behaviour of olcSubordinate:false) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10229] New: ldap_result, when invoked with MSG_RECEIVED and a timeout value set to 0 (polling), does not return all available messages until it is called again
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10229 Issue ID: 10229 Summary: ldap_result, when invoked with MSG_RECEIVED and a timeout value set to 0 (polling), does not return all available messages until it is called again Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- The issue is noticeable when ldap_result is used by the proxy back-ends. It has not affected back-meta behavior, because when a first call is unsuccessful, it retries with a small timeout. back-asyncmeta will also usually call it twice on the same connection from different threads, although this is not a desired behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 10140] New: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10140 Issue ID: 10140 Summary: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Add microsecond-level timestamps to local file logging. Format is: "YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SS.ffffffZ" The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Gregory Noe gnoe(a)symas.com. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2023 Gregory Noe Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 10020] New: dynlist's @groupOfUniqueNames is considered only for the first configuration line
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10020 Issue ID: 10020 Summary: dynlist's @groupOfUniqueNames is considered only for the first configuration line Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: msl(a)touk.pl Target Milestone: --- If we consider the following configuration of dynlist: {0}toukPerson labeledURI uniqueMember+memberOf@groupOfUniqueNames {1}groupOfURLs memberURL uniqueMember+dgMemberOf@groupOfUniqueNames The {0} entry will correctly populate the memberOf relatively to static group membership. The {1} entry will produce dgMemberOf with dynamic group membership correctly (based on memberURL query) but it will not populate static entries IF {0} entry in configuration is present. IF I remove {0} from the dynlist configuration - or - remove @groupOfUniqueNames part from this configuration line, then both dynamic and static entries will be populated correctly for {1}. So the effects are as follows on some user entry: if both {0} and {1} are present - {1} produced only dynamic groups: memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl if both {0} and {1} are present and @groupOfUniqueNames is removed from {0} - {1} produced static+dynamic groups: dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl If only {1} is present - {1} produced static+dynamic groups: dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl For completness - if only {0} is present: memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl I would expect this behavior to be correct for the first case - {0} and {1}. memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 14

[Issue 10279] New: add debug notice also to client tools
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 Issue ID: 10279 Summary: add debug notice also to client tools Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rossi.f(a)inwind.it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1040 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1040&action=edit openldap-2.6.4-debug-notice.patch The command line -d option, when used for debugging, does nothing if openldap was not compiled byth --enable-debug option. For the server part there is a notice to the user regarding this, I propose to add the same also to client tools. Here is attached the simple patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10307] New: Regression when searching for nonexistent entries and no access to DB
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10307 Issue ID: 10307 Summary: Regression when searching for nonexistent entries and no access to DB Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.17 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Patch incoming -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10309] New: Handle potential null pointers returned by ber_strdup
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10309 Issue ID: 10309 Summary: Handle potential null pointers returned by ber_strdup Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: safecoding233(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1052 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1052&action=edit fix patch I added two null pointer checks for pointers returned by ber_strdup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10320] New: sigsegv in autogroup
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 May '25

23 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10320 Issue ID: 10320 Summary: sigsegv in autogroup Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sergej+openldap(a)p5n.pp.ru Target Milestone: --- slapd crashes in autogroup overlay on group modification I have few coredumps and can provide more information. This fails on 0x23 address, it may differs but it looks like f->f_un.f_un_complex is not ended with NULL sometimes. Modified group here is not autogroup, just groupOfUniqueNames. Operation is adding uniqueMember. Distro: Archlinux Overlay config: overlay autogroup autogroup-attrset labeledURIObject labeledURI uniqueMember autogroup-memberof-ad memberOf Stack: #0 0x00007e77bf511d7c in autogroup_memberOf_filter (f=f@entry=0x6f2c6d6165742d70, dn=dn@entry=0x7e765c1659f8, memberof_ad=memberof_ad@entry=0x5ac9490c2190) at autogroup.c:1532 #1 0x00007e77bf511dd1 in autogroup_memberOf_filter (f=0x6f2c6d6165742d70, f@entry=0x5ac9495089f0, dn=dn@entry=0x7e765c1659f8, memberof_ad=memberof_ad@entry=0x5ac9490c2190) at autogroup.c:1537 #2 0x00007e77bf511dd1 in autogroup_memberOf_filter (f=0x5ac9495089f0, dn=dn@entry=0x7e765c1659f8, memberof_ad=0x5ac9490c2190) at autogroup.c:1537 #3 0x00007e77bf512538 in autogroup_modify_entry (op=<optimized out>, rs=0x7e7665cf9910) at autogroup.c:1606 #4 0x00005ac946faf432 in overlay_op_walk () #5 0x00005ac946faf5f2 in ?? () #6 0x00005ac946f494cf in fe_op_modify () #7 0x00005ac946f4b623 in do_modify () #8 0x00005ac946f304d7 in ?? () #9 0x00005ac946f30f4b in ?? () #10 0x00007e77c04756e1 in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x5ac949016bc0) at tpool.c:1059 #11 0x00007e77bfe4b70a in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 #12 0x00007e77bfecfaac in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 (gdb) p *f Cannot access memory at address 0x23 (gdb) up #1 0x000070fe705f3dd1 in autogroup_memberOf_filter (f=0x23, f@entry=0x55d1c45b6310, dn=dn@entry=0x70fd3000c428, memberof_ad=memberof_ad@entry=0x55d1c416a300) at autogroup.c:1537 1537 result = result || autogroup_memberOf_filter( f, dn, memberof_ad ); (gdb) up #2 0x000070fe705f3dd1 in autogroup_memberOf_filter (f=0x55d1c45b6310, f@entry=0x55d1c45b6670, dn=dn@entry=0x70fd3000c428, memberof_ad=memberof_ad@entry=0x55d1c416a300) at autogroup.c:1537 1537 result = result || autogroup_memberOf_filter( f, dn, memberof_ad ); (gdb) p *f->f_un.f_un_complex $5 = {f_choice = 124232868587560, f_un = {f_un_result = 939550768, f_un_desc = 0x70fd38006830, f_un_ava = 0x70fd38006830, f_un_ssa = 0x70fd38006830, f_un_mra = 0x70fd38006830, f_un_complex = 0x70fd38006830}, f_next = 0x23} f_next is 0x23 which is bad address -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs