- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #24 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- A reminder that the OpenLDAP Project is worked solely by volunteers. Symas does not direct the operation of the Project. They merely provide support for what the Project releases. Your criticism of Symas is wholly out of place. Meanwhile, criticizing work that was given to you for free, without you ever lifting a finger to contribute, just makes you a selfish, entitled, ungrateful ass. If you think you can run things better, then actively contribute. That is the only way that open source projects advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #23 from jel+git(a)linofee.org --- Just upgraded a server from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04, which contains 2.5.x and found out, that the options -p and -h got dropped - and requires me to adjust quite a bit of scripts because of this non-sense. This is such a poor software management and versioning, hard to believe, that anyone who allowed it to go through, has any experience in enterprise ready software. 1) If one decides to drop an option, it should be a) communicated clearly. b) documented and alternatives shown 2) If a software gets released, which has an incompatible change wrt. previous major.minor.tiny version, it should rise the major number of the software version, so that OS/Distro vendors are warned and may decide to stick with the old version. There are several options to allow -H and -h,-p side by side - openldap has chosen the worst option. This might be a hint, how poor its maintenance actually is/how bad the support by sysmas probably is. This is also a good example, that for OS/Distro vendors it is sometimes a really good thing to stick with the older version instead of switching to the "latest" stuff. Anyway, thanx for the work. =8-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10158] New: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10158 Issue ID: 10158 Summary: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: umagmrit(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10013] New: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 17 Jan '24

17 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10013 Issue ID: 10013 Summary: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Certain parts of the source indicate that rs->sr_ctrls shouldn't be realloc'd/free'd unless REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED is set, but then other parts of slapd (slap_ctrl_whatFailed_add, glue_op_search?, ...) and overlays (ppolicy, syncprov, ...) will blindly overwrite and/or realloc it. slap_add_control() (an analog of slap_add_controls()) might be useful for this, possibly alongside some way to free the other data kept around to streamline the code other users need for correct operation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9944] New: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 Issue ID: 9944 Summary: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- On a system with olcDbIDAssertBind configured, and proxied authorizations working correctly, an olcDbACLBind statement was added to the configuration for lastbind support. However an incorrect identity was in place for the authzid in the ACL bind statement which caused proxy authorization to fail. The change was backed out (There was never any change to the olcDbIDAssertBind config fragment) and after that, all write operations failed instead of being proxied, with err=80. Restarting slapd fixed the issue, which indicates an underlying problem in the cn=config db in reverting to the original working state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10151] New: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10151 Issue ID: 10151 Summary: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Investigating the persistent CI failures in test050, I can see some memory leaks that should be tackled (if only to reduce noise). For one, when receiving an entry without a syncrepl control attached or when dealing with a concurrent thread removing that consumer, we leak our scratch data (decoded controls, modlist, ...). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10137] New: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10137 Issue ID: 10137 Summary: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.30 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: renault.cle(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 992 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=992&action=edit The patch do apply to midl.h Hello, I would like to slightly change the midl.h c file to make it possible to change the MDB_IDL_LOGN define without having to fork on my side. I know it can be redefined to reduce the amount of memory allocated by LMDB. I am using the latest `mdb.master` branch version of LMDB. https://github.com/mozilla/lmdb/pull/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10157] New: mdb_load doesn't build for me
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10157 Issue ID: 10157 Summary: mdb_load doesn't build for me Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vl(a)samba.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1001 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1001&action=edit Patch see attached patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • f5c96f44 by Howard Chu at 2024-01-10T17:05:13+00:00 ITS#7420 move entry_naming_check earlier in Add • 7debe76f by Howard Chu at 2024-01-15T16:43:56+00:00 ITS#7420 re-fix slapcommon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10154] New: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10154 Issue ID: 10154 Summary: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Configure the auto close action for PRs created on Github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 --- Comment #9 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #8) > The patch in MR!665 (now in master) has introduced a regression in slapadd > not filling in the implicit RDN attributes. Try removing line 7 > (olcDatabase: {0}config) in tests/data/slapd-dynamic.ldif and run test062. I see, the naming check needed to happen before the schema check. Fixed now in master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 --- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- The patch in MR!665 (now in master) has introduced a regression in slapadd not filling in the implicit RDN attributes. Try removing line 7 (olcDatabase: {0}config) in tests/data/slapd-dynamic.ldif and run test062. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10156] New: Any recorded crash-consistency bugs/vulnerabilities in LMDB for study?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jan '24

14 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10156 Issue ID: 10156 Summary: Any recorded crash-consistency bugs/vulnerabilities in LMDB for study? Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: yilegu(a)cs.washington.edu Target Milestone: --- Dear LMDB developers, Hello! I am Michael Gu, a CS PhD student at the University of Washington, advised by Prof. Baris Kasikci. We are building a software testing tool that can test the crash-consistency of POSIX applications. The tool also supports testing MMIO-based applications and we think LMDB is a perfect evaluation target. We are wondering if there are any recorded crash consistency bugs/vulnerabilities during the development of the LMDB database. If so, could you kindly provide some pointers to which version of the LMDB database has such issues and if possible the Github commit or Issue ID on OpenLDAP issue tracking system correspondingly? Thank you so much in advance! Bests, Michael Gu ----------------- Yile (Michael) Gu CSE Ph.D. Student University of Washington -- Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering yilegu(a)cs.washington.edu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8826] Contrib dsaschema module needs updating for cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8826 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 69a4a03a by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-12-05T16:56:29+00:00 ITS#8826 Allow minimal dsaschema configuration in cn=config -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8852] slapd memory use grows continuously with non-delta syncrepl and modifying groups
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8852 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 8986f99d by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-11-14T18:09:10+00:00 ITS#8852 Optimise attr_cmp for sortval attributes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8180] back-sock should not return sucess in case of error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 64789dd2 by Howard Chu at 2023-11-14T17:02:18+00:00 ITS#8180 back-sock: return error when str2entry fails • 66edd345 by Howard Chu at 2023-11-14T17:02:18+00:00 ITS#8677 back-sock: return error for CONTINUE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9660] New: back-mdb Permission denied => Restore from backup
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9660 Issue ID: 9660 Summary: back-mdb Permission denied => Restore from backup Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: geert.hendrickx(a)telenetgroup.be Target Milestone: --- Cosmetic issue: When an mdb database has incorrect ownership or permissions (typically after slapadd as root), back-mdb fails with: mdb_db_open: database "dc=my-domain,dc=com" cannot be opened: Permission denied (13). Restore from backup! "Permission denied" is correct, but "Restore from backup" is maybe not the most appropriate advice. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10150] New: liblber/etest.c calls open with O_CREAT without specifying file mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10150 Issue ID: 10150 Summary: liblber/etest.c calls open with O_CREAT without specifying file mode Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: alan.coopersmith(a)oracle.com Target Milestone: --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6_6/li… has this call to the open() function: if (( fd = open( "lber-test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_BINARY )) Since O_CREAT is specified, there should be a third argument specifying the file permissions for the newly created file, but it is missing here, which may cause the file to be created with permissions based on whatever noise is in the register or stack position the call reads the third argument from on a given platform. Fortunately, it looks like this code may never be compiled, since it's inside #ifdef HAVE_CONSOLE_H and I can't find anywhere that is set, since it's not in any AC_CONFIG_HEADER checks in the configure.ac file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10125] New: mdb_load: fix loading in Append mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10125 Issue ID: 10125 Summary: mdb_load: fix loading in Append mode Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- After committing/flushing a batch of writes, the cursor is not correctly reinitialized in Append mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 8498] slapadd complains about missing attrs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8498 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 2939df1a by Howard Chu at 2023-11-02T16:53:26+00:00 ITS#8498 slapadd: silence warning for NULL entry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10148] New: About
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Dec '23

26 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10148 Issue ID: 10148 Summary: About Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: pinkilhagency(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Welcome to LH Talent Agency, a leading provider of live hosting talent for events and productions. In the fast-paced world of live hosting, finding the perfect individual to engage and captivate your audience is crucial. That's where LH Talent Agency comes in. With our extensive network of experienced and dynamic hosts, we can match you with the perfect talent to ensure your event is a success. Whether you need a skilled emcee, a charismatic presenter, or a engaging host, LH Talent Agency has the expertise and resources to meet your needs. Read on to learn more about how LH Talent Agency can elevate your live hosting experience. More Info - https://livehosting.xyz/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10146] New: Typo in doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Dec '23

19 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10146 Issue ID: 10146 Summary: Typo in doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: joshua(a)joshua.hu Target Milestone: --- In doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3 it states that the fmt for null is: n Null. No parameter is required. The element is simply skipped if it is recognized. Should it not be 'N'? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Dec '23

19 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #7 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- Fix in https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/665 please test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10131] New: wildcard search crash slapd with OU containing parenthesis
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Dec '23

12 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10131 Issue ID: 10131 Summary: wildcard search crash slapd with OU containing parenthesis Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.16 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: bourguijl(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Dears, When I do following ldapsearch as following : ldapsearch -x -H ldap://hostname:3891 -b "o=mobistar.be" -s subtree "(&(objectClass=groupOfUniqueNames)(uniqueMember=uid=jlb,ou=*,o=mobistar.be))" cn dn and the DB is containing these entries : dn: uid=jlb,ou=Test (aa),ou=Partners,o=mobistar.be dn: ou=Test (aa),ou=Partners,o=mobistar.be even if this "uid=jlb" isn't member of a group as uniqueMember, it makes slapd crashing. I did test it on versions 2.5.7 & 2.5.16, same result --> slapd crashed. Seems to be related to parenthesis presence in OU attribut. Is it a bug ? Thx, Jean-Luc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9717] New: The RADIUSOV overlay can be incorporated into OpenLDAP
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9717 Issue ID: 9717 Summary: The RADIUSOV overlay can be incorporated into OpenLDAP Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rdubner(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs