- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 8702] SLAPD_MAX_DAEMON_THREADS is too small
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Aug '20

18 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8702 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=7926 Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Fixed as a part of ITS#7926 Commits: • 2f94318f by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:00:58+01:00 ITS#7926 support multiple config cleanup functions per op Prep for main changes • 9d2f1530 by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:37:50+01:00 ITS#7926 dynamic changes to olcListenerThreads Reallocates sockets from old to new listener threads -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7926] modifying olcListenerThreads crashes slapd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Aug '20

18 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7926 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=8702 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7926] modifying olcListenerThreads crashes slapd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Aug '20

18 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7926 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |TEST Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 2f94318f by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:00:58+01:00 ITS#7926 support multiple config cleanup functions per op Prep for main changes • 9d2f1530 by Howard Chu at 2020-08-18T22:37:50+01:00 ITS#7926 dynamic changes to olcListenerThreads Reallocates sockets from old to new listener threads -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

How to Add Tag in Website
by Anuj jindal 18 Aug '20

18 Aug '20

In our last blog we discussed the UGC NET JRF Eligibility Criteria (UGC NET JRF Admit Card, Eligibility Criteria & Exam Result). Hence the checklist for you to know your eligibility, let’s discuss the checklist of the UGC NET JRF exam that checks your efficiency. <a href="https://www.anujjindal.in/ugc-net-apply-online-syllabus-selection-criteria/">UGC NET JRF Selection Criteria</a>

1 0

[Issue 9135] mdb index corruption during legitimate delete
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Aug '20

13 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9135] mdb index corruption during legitimate delete
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Aug '20

13 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |TEST --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • b0d73083 by Howard Chu at 2020-08-13T18:18:45+01:00 ITS#9135 fix index error on collapsed range -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9135] mdb index corruption during legitimate delete
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Aug '20

13 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Konstantin Andreev from comment #0) > Full_Name: Konstantin Andreev > Version: 2.4.48, git/master/44a7b46/20191203 > OS: Solaris 11.3 x64 > URL: > Submission from: (NULL) (79.135.238.172) > > > Here is a test case. > > 1) choose an attribute that has an equality index in your dit; > > 2) for this attribute choose a value that does not (and did not) exist in > the dit yet; > > Let assume you chose [o=1] attr/val pair. > > 3) add MDB_IDL_DB_MAX+1 ( = 0x10000 = 65536 ) entries having [o=1] > attr/val > pair. > > 4) delete last MDB_IDL_DB_MAX-1 of them in the order inverted as > compared to > the order of addition > > Now you have two entries having [o=1] attr/val pair. Let assume they are > > | $ ldapsearch -s sub -b 'ou=T' '(o=1)' o > | dn: cn=1,ou=T > | o: 1 > | > | dn: cn=2,ou=T > | o: 1 > > 5) delete one of the remaining entries, e.g. cn=2,ou=T > > Repeat the search: > > | $ ldapsearch -s sub -b 'ou=T' '(o=1)' o > | $ > > Nope, the remaining entry has been lost from the index forever. But it is > still > in the dit: > > | $ ldapsearch -s one -b 'ou=T' '(objectclass=*)' o > | dn: cn=1,ou=T > | o: 1 > | > | dn: ou=A,ou=T > | ... > > You need to slapindex to restore `o' index to a valid state, but you may not > know you need to repair the index. > > The probability of this scenario is negligible, because indexed entries never > form continuous block of ids of many-thousand length, but the code for this > scenario exists and has a bug. Thanks for the report. Fixed now in master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9312] New: Getting connection_read(23): no connection!
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9312 Issue ID: 9312 Summary: Getting connection_read(23): no connection! Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.44 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shaheena.kazi(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I have a connection_read(23): no connection! message in my syslog. This does not affect the functionality of anything on system but is simply present in the logs. Also, it comes randomly. No wrong password error or no such issues. I have referred the ID's - 8781 and 6548. But it does not help. Secondly, I have updated the consolidated patch for the openldap version from the openldap/patches website. that too does not help. We want to know why this messages come in the logs ? Regarding, This commonly occurs when a client ends the connection without properly ending an unbind request first. The solution would be to fix the client involved. -- What does the client server need to do here ? I mean what is to be handled correctly ? Is there any configuration miss ? Awaiting your response. - Shaheena K -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9313] New: TLS 1.3 Support on 2.4.44
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9313 Issue ID: 9313 Summary: TLS 1.3 Support on 2.4.44 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.44 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shaheena.kazi(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I wanted to know if TLSv1.3 is supported on openldap 2.4.44 If no, then what about on openldap 2.4.47 ? Awaiting your response. Regards, Shaheena K -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

Nabard Grade A Syllabus
by Anuj jindal 11 Aug '20

11 Aug '20

NABARD Grade A officer post is one such post which is a dream of a lot of people. You get to make policies for the backbone of the country “agriculture”. You can look at the job profile of a NABARD Grade A Officer. It is really interesting. The salary of a NABARD Grade A officer is good and its syllabus is similar to that of RBI & SEBI. You can go through NABARD Grade A salary here. In this blog, I’m essentially going to talk about five things: <a href="https://www.anujjindal.in/nabard-grade-a-selection-criteria-syllabus-cut-of…">NABARD Grade A Selection Criteria </a>

1 0

[Issue 9171] slapd with ppolicy and pwdAccountLockedTime crashes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 10 Aug '20

10 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9171 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=9309 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9299] New: Memory leaks in ldap_simple_bind_s
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Aug '20

05 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9299 Issue ID: 9299 Summary: Memory leaks in ldap_simple_bind_s Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: Ritu.Varkey(a)microfocus.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 747 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=747&action=edit Sample code with call to bind API The call to ldap_simple_bind_s API leaks memory. Even after calling ldap_unbind_s or ldap_unbind_ext memory is not getting freed. Our application uses this API every time we make a connection to the directory. The API is being used on Windows operating system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9085] Test suite is failing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Aug '20

03 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9085 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to kloczko.tomasz(a)gmail.com from comment #2) > Could you please say a little more about what kind of "enviroment problem" > it could be? "Hangup" indicates your OS killed the process. You'll need to examine your system logs to determine why. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9085] Test suite is failing
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Aug '20

01 Aug '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9085 --- Comment #2 from kloczko.tomasz(a)gmail.com <kloczko.tomasz(a)gmail.com> --- Could you please say a little more about what kind of "enviroment problem" it could be? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9291] New: Detection of corrupted database files
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jul '20

30 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9291 Issue ID: 9291 Summary: Detection of corrupted database files Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: markus(a)objectbox.io Target Milestone: --- Let's assume we have to deal with a corrupted database for whatever reason (e.g. broken hardware or file system). Current behavior seems to be mostly undefined, which is understandable as it's not known what is broken (e.g. there are no checksums). For example, I'm seeing a SIGBUS in mdb_page_touch because the cursor's top page (mp) is pointing to invalid memory (0x7f99cf004000) during a commit: mdb_page_touch mdb.c:2772 mdb_page_search mdb.c:6595 mdb_freelist_save mdb.c:3575 mdb_txn_commit mdb.c:4060 Cursor data at that point: mc_snum = 1, mc_top = 0; myki[0] = 0 A SIGBUS is troublesome as it crashes the process, and I wonder if there are other ways to detect such inconsistencies. If that be possible there could be user-specific handling in place. E.g. a user might start a new database file. This issue was reported by our users, which also provided DB files: https://github.com/objectbox/objectbox-java/issues/859 I did not find a lot of consistency checks besides MDB_PAGE_NOTFOUND and MDB_CORRUPTED. Also, I think there's no current way to thoroughly check a DB file (e.g. like fsck for the DB file)? My first idea other than checksums was to walk through the branch pages from the root and check if the referenced pages are within reasonable bounds. Also check the page content (e.g. nodes, flags). Additionally (optionally?), it should be possible to check that the key values are actually sorted. So, it boils down to 3 points in summary: 1.) If there no way to check the DB file for consistency yet(?), which approach do you think would make sense? There might be two modes; one for a through check through all data, and a quick check that does not take long and could be e.g. done when opening the DB. Goal is to avoid process crashes and let users handle the situation. 2.) In general, is it possible to add more consistency checks in regular DB operations? 3.) Could the the particular situation (for which I provided the stack trace) detected (e.g. is myki[0] = 0 legal here?) I'd be happy to provide a patch if you provide some direction where you want to take that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 25

[Issue 8784] SIGBUS in mdb_page_touch
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Jul '20

27 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8784 --- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to stefan.penner from comment #2) > I realize this issue is rather old, but I have some related questions; > hopefully that is alright: > > * The reporter mentions Android 7, do we know if the problem is limited to > Android 7, or do other Androids also suffer from this issue? > * Was someone able to come up with a consistent reproduction? If so, could > it be shared or described? I'm not aware of any consistent reproducer. Also, haven't run into this in quite a while, possibly it was already fixed in Android 9 or so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8784] SIGBUS in mdb_page_touch
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 Jul '20

27 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8784 --- Comment #2 from stefan.penner(a)gmail.com --- I realize this issue is rather old, but I have some related questions; hopefully that is alright: * The reporter mentions Android 7, do we know if the problem is limited to Android 7, or do other Androids also suffer from this issue? * Was someone able to come up with a consistent reproduction? If so, could it be shared or described? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9266] Replace custom hostname and IP address verification with OpenSSL API
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9266 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Also important to note that RFC6125 specifically states in section 1.4 that it does not apply to existing protocols, such as LDAP. It even calls this out in Appendix B, section B.3, that the LDAP protocol is *not* covered by this RFC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9301] New: Building OpenLDAP on Silicon (ARM) Mac
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9301 Issue ID: 9301 Summary: Building OpenLDAP on Silicon (ARM) Mac Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Mac OS Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nicolas.brachfogel(a)4d.com Target Milestone: --- There's currently no target to build OpenLDAP on the new Apple Silicon (ARM) Macs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 6467] syncrepl enhancements
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 66a743f1 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-07-22T22:25:10+01:00 ITS#6467 Record minCSN in audit container • 43ebfa8f by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-07-22T22:25:10+01:00 ITS#6467 Make accesslog a possible sessionlog source • ee79cb38 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-07-22T22:25:10+01:00 ITS#6467 Add test script -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8645] syncrepl configuration error handling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8645 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | Resolution|--- |TEST --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 4b62f3b8 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2020-07-22T20:22:50+00:00 ITS#8645 Check for all syncrepl errors -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9098] assert fails in meta_back_search in some cases after reconnect
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9098 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.4.51 |2.4.52 --- Comment #19 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Going to move this to a target of 2.4.52. We will be trying to reproduce this internally with some new hardware we've acquired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8511] Rename "mirrormode" to "multiprovider", deprecate "mirrormode" parameter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Rename "mirrormode" to |Rename "mirrormode" to |"multimaster", deprecate |"multiprovider", deprecate |"mirrormode" parameter |"mirrormode" parameter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8511] Rename "mirrormode" to "multimaster", deprecate "mirrormode" parameter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, | |OL_2_5_REQ, | |openldap-scratch | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8511] Rename "mirrormode" to "multimaster", deprecate "mirrormode" parameter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8511 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST --- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 3716245f by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2020-07-22T19:32:49+00:00 Issue#8511 - Update documentation and configs to correctly use multiprovider -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs