openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20960 discussions

Re: (ITS#4866) Can we list Null Value Attributes
by hyc＠symas.com 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

The ITS is not for general software usage questions. Use the ldap(a)umich.edu mailing list for general LDAP questions. This ITS will be closed. maruthigsr(a)gmail.com wrote: > Full_Name: Maruthi Gullapudi > Version: > OS: AIX > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (194.221.133.211) > > > Hi, > > I wanted to list all the users based on the value of one attribute using the > LDAPSEARCH Command. The value of that attribute is NULL. I dont know whether > LDAPSEARCH will capture null values. > > Can anyone tell me how to list users from an LDAP directory based on a NUll > valued attribute. > > Thanks in Advance > Maruthi > > > . > -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#4869) config creates base64 encoded rootdn
by hyc＠symas.com 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

What is the original rootdn? dieter(a)dkluenter.de wrote: > Full_Name: Dieter Kluenter > Version: 2.4.4alpha > OS: linux > URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ > Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.235.193) > > > When running slapd with -F -f to create a new config database, olcRootDN value > is created base64 encoded > > => ldap_bv2dn(p,0) > ldap_err2string > <= ldap_bv2dn(p)=-4 Decoding error > ldap_err2string > olcRootDN: value #0: <olcRootDN> invalid DN 21 (Invalid syntax) > config error processing olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config: <olcRootDN> invalid DN 21 > > (Invalid syntax) > send_ldap_result: conn=-1 op=0 p=0 > send_ldap_result: err=19 matched="" text="" > slapd destroy: freeing system resources. > slapd stopped. > > -Dieter > > > . > -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

(ITS#4869) config creates base64 encoded rootdn
by dieter＠dkluenter.de 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Full_Name: Dieter Kluenter Version: 2.4.4alpha OS: linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (84.142.235.193) When running slapd with -F -f to create a new config database, olcRootDN value is created base64 encoded => ldap_bv2dn(p,0) ldap_err2string <= ldap_bv2dn(p)=-4 Decoding error ldap_err2string olcRootDN: value #0: <olcRootDN> invalid DN 21 (Invalid syntax) config error processing olcDatabase={1}hdb,cn=config: <olcRootDN> invalid DN 21 (Invalid syntax) send_ldap_result: conn=-1 op=0 p=0 send_ldap_result: err=19 matched="" text="" slapd destroy: freeing system resources. slapd stopped. -Dieter

1 0

Re: example: OpenLDAP with SASL/DIGEST-MD5 authentication (ITS#4867)
by ando＠sys-net.it 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Piotr.Golonka(a)cern.ch wrote: > Indeed, 2.2.13 may be historical, It is. It's not an opinion, but a fact. Even 2.2.30, the latest 2.2 release, is historical. > yet this is the version used in large > production systems (e.g. RedHat Enterprise Linux). I believe the problem is not ours. I think we did our best by pushing out 2.2 up to 2.2.30, then 2.3 up to 2.3.34, and now 2.4. If distributions don't catch up I don't think anyone can blame OpenLDAP (and I don't think you are; I'm just trying to make the point). > I'll try to have a look at what's in 2.4. I hope I get my point: every contribution is welcome, but not every contribution may be useful. Writing howtos for code that was released ages ago, and is not maintained may be considered little useful. This is an opinion, of course. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.n.c. Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ------------------------------------------ Office: +39.02.23998309 Mobile: +39.333.4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: example: OpenLDAP with SASL/DIGEST-MD5 authentication (ITS#4867)
by Piotr.Golonka＠cern.ch 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

On Monday 12 March 2007 18:04, you wrote: > 2.2.13 is historical. ldap_sasl_bind(3) eventually got documented (only > the prototype in 2.3, more docs in 2.4). Please check current 2.4 > documentation and, in case, adapt your contribution to it. In fact, that > man page does not contain any coding example, as we usually refer to client > tools implementations. Please feel free to submit your contribution, lined > up to active code, as a FAQ entry <http://www.openldap.org/faq/>. The FAQ > is interactive. Hi, thanx for reply. Indeed, 2.2.13 may be historical, yet this is the version used in large production systems (e.g. RedHat Enterprise Linux). I'll try to have a look at what's in 2.4. best regards: Piotr

1 0

(ITS#4868) Binary Attribute Patch(es)
by vargok＠yahoo.com 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Full_Name: Kevin Vargo Version: 2.3.32 OS: Linux (RH-EL4) URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/openldap-2.3.32-kv1-patch_support-binary-at… Submission from: (NULL) (128.237.242.55) These address the use of Binary-valued attributes (#3113, #3386): For example, inetOrgPerson.userCertificate is usually transferred with the ";binary" directive. ";binary" is not handled by OpenLDAP/Back-SQL. As well, the data itself, when stored in the database is not properly read out -- all data is read as SQL_C_CHAR data. This supports SQL_C_BINARY-based data. There remains an issue with selecting attributes using, e.g., "userCertificate;binary" -- nothing is returned. Someone with a better understanding of the attribute-processing method would be much more effective in terms of finding the correct place to remove the ";binary" from the "attribute-name." (i.e. "userCertificate;binary" is NOT the attribute-name; "userCertificate" is the attribute-name, ";binary" is a transport directive (see #3113). Additionally, I included to the patch to remove the "assert(0)" in Back-SQL's verification that a search filter and ldap-data don't mis-match on suffix. Tags: OpenLDAP, Back-SQL, MySQL, userCertificate, Binary Attributes, Client Certificates (1) ./servers/slapd/back-sql/search.c.patch Addressed ITS#4856 -- I think you already fixed this (2) ./servers/slapd/back-sql/back-sql.h.patch ./servers/slapd/back-sql/entry-id.c.patch ./servers/slapd/back-sql/sql-wrap.c.patch Address ITS#3113, ITS#3386 Support for binary attribute values (3) ./servers/slapd/back-sql/schema-map.c.patch Addresses issue with accessing attributes that have been provided with ";binary" directive note that I have no doubts whatso ever that there are many better ways to do (3).

1 0

(ITS#4867) example: OpenLDAP with SASL/DIGEST-MD5 authentication
by Piotr.Golonka＠CERN.CH 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Full_Name: Piotr.Golonka(a)CERN.CH Version: 2.2.13 OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/golonka-pkg-070312.tgz Submission from: (NULL) (137.138.170.170) Hi, the documentation of the ldap_sasl_bind* family of functions is missing, and getting the actual DIGEST-MD5 authentication in your C code working seems to be completely undocumented. I went through the complete code of ldapsearch.c and extracted the minimal code that succesfully demonstrates DIGEST-MD5 authentication. In my case, I authenticated against ActiveDirectory server. I uploaded the example into your FTP server as golonka-pkg-070312.tgz I hope it may be useful to publish it as a short "Howto" material... regards Piotr Golonka CERN

1 0

(ITS#4866) Can we list Null Value Attributes
by maruthigsr＠gmail.com 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Full_Name: Maruthi Gullapudi Version: OS: AIX URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (194.221.133.211) Hi, I wanted to list all the users based on the value of one attribute using the LDAPSEARCH Command. The value of that attribute is NULL. I dont know whether LDAPSEARCH will capture null values. Can anyone tell me how to list users from an LDAP directory based on a NUll valued attribute. Thanks in Advance Maruthi

1 0

Re: (ITS#4864) -r option "redirects" to logfile, breaks replication
by ando＠sys-net.it 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

[please keep the ITS in CC] Eubank, Chris LCS:EX wrote: > Am running Solaris 10, and the version I stuck in the log. > > When I created an "openldaprc" and used the variable for the > replication log, What is the "variable for the replication log"? All one usually needs to do is define a replogfile in slapd.conf(5) > (which ends up obviously running the slurpd daemon > with the -r switch), Again: there's no need to use -r if replogfile is in slapd.conf(5); if there is no replogfile in slapd.conf(5), slapd(8) will not generate any log, so slurpd(8) will have nothing to do > it sent the replication data to the logfile and > not to the replication hosts being specified. Who sent the replication data to the logfile? slapd(8) is supposed to write replication data to the file specified in replogfile (sladp.conf(5)); slurpd(8) is supposed to read that file (whose existence and location is known by parsing slapd.conf(5)), copy the content it is able to process to its own replication log, which resides in slurpd's working directory (default or passed with -t) and is called slurpd.replog, send that content to the slaves, and remove the data that has been handled from slapd's replication log. This is how things are expected to work. As you may see, -r never comes into play; it's intended to be used to force slurpd processing of a different file, which may be required for special purposes. Do you have any special needs, or are you simply trying to set up usual replication? > Does that make more sense? See comments above. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.n.c. Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ------------------------------------------ Office: +39.02.23998309 Mobile: +39.333.4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: (ITS#4860) Sets' enhancement
by ando＠sys-net.it 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

raphael.ouazana(a)linagora.com wrote: > Fixing these issues, I saw that set_parent will be very similar to > set_chase. Do you think I should create a new gatherer instead of ? I don't see so much similarity: set_chase() is intended to use the gatherer to fetch objects and extract a value from them, including "closure" (recursion). Sublevel does not require fetching, and takes a negative digit as extra argument, rather than an attribute type, so you'd need to add an outer test before calling set_chase() anyway, extend the interface of set_chase() to allow an AttributeDescription and an integer, and so on, while you don't need any callback capability to fetch an object or expand values or so. I'd keep it simple as it is now. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.n.c. Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it ------------------------------------------ Office: +39.02.23998309 Mobile: +39.333.4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ------------------------------------------

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs