openldap-bugs April 2025

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
58 discussions

[Issue 10140] New: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Aug '25

19 Aug '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10140 Issue ID: 10140 Summary: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Add microsecond-level timestamps to local file logging. Format is: "YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SS.ffffffZ" The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Gregory Noe gnoe(a)symas.com. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2023 Gregory Noe Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 9849] New: Update website to support LTS and Feature releases
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Jul '25

15 Jul '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9849 Issue ID: 9849 Summary: Update website to support LTS and Feature releases Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mnormann(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Modify .wlmrc variable names and website content to handle both Feature Release and Long Term Support release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10203] New: no pkgconfig file included for liblmdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '25

14 Jul '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10203 Issue ID: 10203 Summary: no pkgconfig file included for liblmdb Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: otto(a)drijf.net Target Milestone: --- liblmdb does not ship with a pkgconfig file. More and more build systems rely on presense of a pkgconfig file, so it would be nice if liblmdb installed oneone. An example: prefix=/usr/local exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include Name: lmdb Description: Lightning memory-mapped database: key-value data store URL: https://www.symas.com/symas-embedded-database-lmdb Version: 0.9.32 Libs: -L${libdir} -llmdb Cflags: -I${includedir} Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10329] New: Additional issues with pcache, and a test
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jun '25

30 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10329 Issue ID: 10329 Summary: Additional issues with pcache, and a test Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: aweits(a)rit.edu Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1062 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1062&action=edit test & patches Hello again! Further testing revealed some more issues in pcache [re: ITS#10270]. I've attached an update to test020-proxycache as well. These are based off the current git HEAD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 10297] New: LDAP initialization does unnecessary resolution of hostname
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10297 Issue ID: 10297 Summary: LDAP initialization does unnecessary resolution of hostname Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- curl --version does try to resolve local hostname, which is usually stored in $HOSTNAME variable. It seems it does that for no good reason. It does not matter whether machine hostname is already FQDN or not, it always try it unconditionally by calling getaddrinfo(3). Every usage of dnf tries to resolve hostname. That is then supressed by myhostname on Fedora, which returns non-helping response. Possibly, the hostname should be fetched from actual network responses. Seen with: openldap-2.6.8-5.fc41.x86_64 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install gdb curl 2. gdb --args curl --version 3. (gdb) break getaddrinfo 4. (gdb) run Actual Results: getaddrinfo is called with current hostname, stored into ldap_int_hostname variable. That is used only when ldap client has not configured target server. But this hostname seems fetched always. Expected Results: No network activity happens, unless something is actually requested. This is not the case. Suggestion is to make it lazy initialized. It should be tried only when necessary. This seems to be useful when tlso_session_chkhost in libraries/libldap/tls_o.c is used. It should initialize hostname only once conditions to use it happens. There is a fallback anyway. It should query FQDN only when name_in contains unusable response. Related: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/34897 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10303] New: Web site still presents the 2.5 version as LTS
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '25

27 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10303 Issue ID: 10303 Summary: Web site still presents the 2.5 version as LTS Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: elecharny(a)apache.org Target Milestone: --- The OpenLDAP web site still indicates that the OpenLDAP 2.5 version is the LTS, despite a mail announced on August 10, 2024 that starting from January 2025 teh 2.6 branch will be the LTS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10288] New: autoca Attribute olcAutoCAserverClass
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 May '25

22 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10288 Issue ID: 10288 Summary: autoca Attribute olcAutoCAserverClass Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.9 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stefan(a)kania-online.de Target Milestone: --- I try to add the autoca overlay with the following ldif: -------------- dn: olcOverlay=autoca,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config objectClass: olcAutoCAConfig objectClass: olcOverlayConfig olcOverlay: autoca olcAutoCADays: 3652 olcAutoCAKeybits: 4096 olcAutoCAserverClass: ipHost olcAutoCAserverDays: 1826 olcAutoCAserverKeybits: 4096 olcAutoCAuserClass: person olcAutoCAuserDays: 365 olcAutoCAuserKeybits: 4096 -------------- ldapadd gives me: adding new entry "olcOverlay=autoca,olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config" ldap_add: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) additional info: <olcAutoCAserverClass> handler exited with 1 If I remove the attribute from my ldif, it works. What is wrong with the olcAutoCAserverClass attribute in my ldif? I try to look it up in the admin handbook but I could not find anything. I looked in the source code and found: ------------ { "serverClass", "objectclass", 2, 2, 0, ARG_STRING|ARG_MAGIC|ACA_SRVCLASS, autoca_cf, "( OLcfgOvAt:22.2 NAME 'olcAutoCAserverClass' " "DESC 'ObjectClass of server entries' " "EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL }, ------------ For me it looks the same as the attribute olcAutoCAuserclass. ------------- { "userClass", "objectclass", 2, 2, 0, ARG_STRING|ARG_MAGIC|ACA_USRCLASS, autoca_cf, "( OLcfgOvAt:22.1 NAME 'olcAutoCAuserClass' " "DESC 'ObjectClass of user entries' " "EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL }, ------------- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10290] New: Combination of syncrepl+rwm+syncprov frees the wrong modlist
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 May '25

22 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Issue ID: 10290 Summary: Combination of syncrepl+rwm+syncprov frees the wrong modlist Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- An MPR setup with rwm enabled (regardless of configuration it seems) will crash with the provided modlist being freed twice. This is the sequence of events of what is stored in op->orm_modlist, allocated and freed by whom, replacing the actual pointers to make it easier to track: syncrepl_message_to_op: preparing a modify with 0xoriginal syncrepl_op_modify: old modlist 0xoriginal replacing with 0xsyncrepl_op_modify rwm_op_modify: old modlist 0xsyncrepl_op_modify replacing with 0xrwm_op_modify <modify happens> syncrepl_modify_cb: freeing 0xsyncrepl_op_modify, replacing with 0xoriginal (forgetting 0xrwm_op_modify) rwm_op_rollback: freeing 0xoriginal replacing with 0xsyncrepl_op_modify syncrepl_message_to_op: went in with 0xoriginal, got 0xsyncrepl_op_modify back syncrepl_message_to_op: freeing 0xsyncrepl_op_modify Not sure who is at fault: syncrepl_modify_cb is the one freeing the wrong modlist, but then if backover were to work with an actual "stack", running response callbacks in the opposite order from the request, things would have been ok too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 10302] New: Double free of idcursor
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 May '25

22 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10302 Issue ID: 10302 Summary: Double free of idcursor Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.rupf(a)lzlabs.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1050 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1050&action=edit proposed patch, which was created from current master, but also applies to 2.6.6 While switching from Oracle Linux (a RHEL clone) 8 to 9 one of our larger LDAP samples started causing a double free error at the end of the slapadd run. While I can't share the LDIF in question and it didn't consistently cause the issue, only every 5-6 times it ran, I could ran gdb and valgrind on it and suggest the attached patch that resolves that error to re-occur. I validated the patch still applies to the current master branch of openldap, as well as to 2.6.6 on EL9 where we encountered this. The error originally observed was this (commands being run as ldap user): [...] rm -r /var/lib/ldap mkdir /var/lib/ldap slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTPROFILECOUNT" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTGLOBALPROFILECOUNT" inserted. -#################### 100.00% eta none elapsed 03s spd 4.2 M/s Closing DB...double free or corruption (!prev) Under valgrind, the following trace could be observed: valgrind --vgdb=full --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all --track-origins=yes slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 ==502== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==502== Copyright (C) 2002-2024, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==502== Using Valgrind-3.23.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==502== Command: slapadd -l /tmp/lz_vault_convert_add.ldif -q -w -n 2 ==502== PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTPROFILECOUNT" inserted. PROXIED attributeDescription "LZVAULTGLOBALPROFILECOUNT" inserted. ==502== Invalid read of size 8 ==502== at 0x1E65A9: mdb_cursor_close (mdb.c:7764) ==502== by 0x1F71B8: UnknownInlinedFun (tools.c:202) ==502== by 0x1F71B8: mdb_tool_entry_close (tools.c:152) ==502== by 0x1D8291: slapadd (slapadd.c:511) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) ==502== Address 0x188c8af8 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 392 free'd ==502== at 0x4847B4C: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:989) ==502== by 0x22CEFE: mdb_cursors_close.isra.0 (mdb.c:2638) ==502== by 0x1EBAAE: mdb_txn_commit (mdb.c:3640) ==502== by 0x1F75E2: mdb_tool_entry_modify (tools.c:1066) ==502== by 0x1D9AF9: slap_tool_update_ctxcsn.part.0 (slapcommon.c:1069) ==502== by 0x1D8440: UnknownInlinedFun (slapcommon.c:962) ==502== by 0x1D8440: slapadd (slapadd.c:502) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) ==502== Block was alloc'd at ==502== at 0x484482F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:446) ==502== by 0x1E8699: mdb_cursor_open (mdb.c:7690) ==502== by 0x1F8C45: mdb_tool_entry_put (tools.c:707) ==502== by 0x1D8150: slapadd (slapadd.c:453) ==502== by 0x1348C6: main (main.c:540) [...] Please advise if I can provide any further diagnostics, while I can still relatively easily reproduce the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10168] New: olcdbindex doesn't cleanup cleanly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 May '25

22 May '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10168 Issue ID: 10168 Summary: olcdbindex doesn't cleanup cleanly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- if you run the following modify against slapd (notice the olcDbMultival data is wrong), slapd aborts in mdb_cf_cleanup->mdb_attr_dbs_open when cleaning up the olcDbIndex changes: dn: olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config changetype: modify add: olcDbIndex olcDbIndex: member eq olcDbIndex: memberof eq - add: olcDbMultival olcDbMultival: member,memberOf 5,15 - -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs April 2025