openldap-bugs March 2024

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

2 participants
104 discussions

[Issue 7298] permissive modify control misparsed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Mar '24

30 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7298 --- Comment #5 from lesignor(a)cirad.fr --- In the Microsoft documentation (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/desktop/ldap/ld…), they write : ldctl_value No data for this control. In the berval structure, set bv_len to zero and bv_val to NULL. As they said set bv_len to zero, I guess some developer choose to send 04 00 to set the length to 0, and other consider to remove all fields. The ldap client, I use, is a dotnet client. I think it uses the c# sdk from Microsoft. Would it be possible to accept both implementation (null or empty) ? It will be a great help to migrate to openldap 2.6.x. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10192] New: otp.c overlay - HOTP wrongly numbers gneration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Mar '24

28 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10192 Issue ID: 10192 Summary: otp.c overlay - HOTP wrongly numbers gneration Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michal.pura(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I am trying to use otp.c overlay but seems that numbers are not properly generated. In my case I have random secret like 'aaaabbbbccccdddd' and according to what Google Authenticator and https://www.verifyr.com/en/otp/check#hotp is generating we should have the following HOTP codes for above secret: 1 - 229789 2 - 801677 3 - 630108 4 - 214543 5 - 916392 6 - 346078 7 - 701644 8 - 865071 9 - 431248 10 - 355053 but, otp.c module is returning the following numbers: 1 - 441008 2 - 465617 3 - 669281 4 - 042697 5 - 461210 6 - 620979 7 - 700859 8 - 573924 9 - 805067 10 - 135880 The secret is properly generated and used in the code. I've checked it under debugger. The hash algorithm is defined as 1.2.840.113549.2.7 -> HMAC-WITH-SHA1. What is wrong? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 7400] Memberof and Syncrepl incompatibility
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7400 --- Comment #14 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • ae1c8f18 by Howard Chu at 2024-02-20T15:55:37+00:00 ITS#7400 slapo-memberof: delete note about deprecation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7400] Memberof and Syncrepl incompatibility
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7400 --- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE26: • f30def77 by Howard Chu at 2024-03-26T16:38:10+00:00 ITS#7400 slapo-memberof: delete note about deprecation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10082] New: More dynlist eval tweaks
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10082 Issue ID: 10082 Summary: More dynlist eval tweaks Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.14 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When the memberOf attribute is a user attribute instead of operational, it will be expanded on any search for (all user attributes). If the search is filtering on objectclasses that don't contain this attribute, that's wasted work. Check for a matching objectclass in the filter before doing that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9037] observing crash in mdb_cursor_put()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9037 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |0.9.32 Target Milestone|--- |0.9.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9037] observing crash in mdb_cursor_put()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9037 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |FIXED Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |hyc(a)openldap.org --- Comment #38 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- RE0.9: • 83dc42c5 by Howard Chu at 2024-03-26T14:52:42+00:00 ITS#9037 mdb_page_search: fix error code when DBI record is missing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10189] New: Extra `#endif` in `libraries/liblunicode/utbm/utbm.h`
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10189 Issue ID: 10189 Summary: Extra `#endif` in `libraries/liblunicode/utbm/utbm.h` Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: annieliu(a)roblox.com Target Milestone: --- In `libraries/liblunicode/utbm/utbm.h` (https://github.com/openldap/openldap/blob/master/libraries/liblunicode/utbm…), only one `#ifndef` macro is defined, but there are two `#endif`s. Wondering if this is a typo? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10190] New: Stack space exhaustion on windows due to FD_SETSIZE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10190 Issue ID: 10190 Summary: Stack space exhaustion on windows due to FD_SETSIZE Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: varunpatil(a)ucla.edu Target Milestone: --- Setting FD_SETSIZE is only effective on Windows and BSD, and is currently set to an unreasonable default of 4096. Each fd_set is initialized with an array of file descriptors of this size; this allocates 8*4096 bytes on 64-bit machines, which quickly exhausts the small stack space on Windows. This patch sets the default to a more reasonable value of 128; the default value on Windows currently is 64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

2 8

[Issue 9378] New: Crash in mdb_put() / mdb_page_dirty()
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Mar '24

26 Mar '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9378 Issue ID: 9378 Summary: Crash in mdb_put() / mdb_page_dirty() Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.26 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nate(a)kde.org Target Milestone: --- The KDE Baloo file indexer uses lmdb as its database (source code available at https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/baloo). Our most common crash, with over 100 duplicate bug reports, is in lmdb. Here's the bug report tracking it: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389848. The version of lmdb does not seem to matter much. We have bug reports from Arch users with lmdb 0.9.26 as well as bug reports from people using many earlier versions. Here's an example backtrace, taken from https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426195: #6 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 #7 0x00007f3c0bbb9859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #8 0x00007f3c0b23ba83 in mdb_assert_fail (env=0x55e2ad710600, expr_txt=expr_txt@entry=0x7f3c0b23e02f "rc == 0", func=func@entry=0x7f3c0b23e978 <__func__.7221> "mdb_page_dirty", line=line@entry=2127, file=0x7f3c0b23e010 "mdb.c") at mdb.c:1542 #9 0x00007f3c0b2306d5 in mdb_page_dirty (mp=<optimized out>, txn=0x55e2ad7109f0) at mdb.c:2114 #10 mdb_page_dirty (txn=0x55e2ad7109f0, mp=<optimized out>) at mdb.c:2114 #11 0x00007f3c0b231966 in mdb_page_alloc (num=num@entry=1, mp=mp@entry=0x7f3c0727aee8, mc=<optimized out>) at mdb.c:2308 #12 0x00007f3c0b231ba3 in mdb_page_touch (mc=mc@entry=0x7f3c0727b420) at mdb.c:2495 #13 0x00007f3c0b2337c7 in mdb_cursor_touch (mc=mc@entry=0x7f3c0727b420) at mdb.c:6523 #14 0x00007f3c0b2368f9 in mdb_cursor_put (mc=mc@entry=0x7f3c0727b420, key=key@entry=0x7f3c0727b810, data=data@entry=0x7f3c0727b820, flags=flags@entry=0) at mdb.c:6657 #15 0x00007f3c0b23976b in mdb_put (txn=0x55e2ad7109f0, dbi=5, key=key@entry=0x7f3c0727b810, data=data@entry=0x7f3c0727b820, flags=flags@entry=0) at mdb.c:9022 #16 0x00007f3c0c7124c5 in Baloo::DocumentDB::put (this=this@entry=0x7f3c0727b960, docId=<optimized out>, docId@entry=27041423333263366, list=...) at ./src/engine/documentdb.cpp:79 #17 0x00007f3c0c743da7 in Baloo::WriteTransaction::replaceDocument (this=0x55e2ad7ea340, doc=..., operations=operations@entry=...) at ./src/engine/writetransaction.cpp:232 #18 0x00007f3c0c736b16 in Baloo::Transaction::replaceDocument (this=this@entry=0x7f3c0727bc10, doc=..., operations=operations@entry=...) at ./src/engine/transaction.cpp:295 #19 0x000055e2ac5d6cbc in Baloo::UnindexedFileIndexer::run (this=0x55e2ad79ca20) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qrefcount.h:60 #20 0x00007f3c0c177f82 in QThreadPoolThread::run (this=0x55e2ad717f20) at thread/qthreadpool.cpp:99 #21 0x00007f3c0c1749d2 in QThreadPrivate::start (arg=0x55e2ad717f20) at thread/qthread_unix.cpp:361 #22 0x00007f3c0b29d609 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:477 #23 0x00007f3c0bcb6103 in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 30

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs March 2024