openldap-bugs January 2024

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
124 discussions

[Issue 10059] New: slapo-homedir(5) could benefit from an configuration example
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10059 Issue ID: 10059 Summary: slapo-homedir(5) could benefit from an configuration example Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: craig.balfour(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 967 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=967&action=edit Patch This module could do with an example of how to configure it. Patch attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10101] New: Fix double file close when first TLS connection fails
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10101 Issue ID: 10101 Summary: Fix double file close when first TLS connection fails Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: florin.crisan(a)axigen.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 981 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=981&action=edit Proof of concept 1. ldap_initialize a connection with multiple URLs, the first one being LDAPS. (For example: "ldaps://server,ldap://server"). The LDAPS connection needs to successfully open the TCP connection, but fail during TLS negotiation. 2. When TLS negotiation fails, ldap_int_open_connection calls ber_int_sb_close (which closes the connections attached to the sockbuf) but fails to call ber_int_sb_destroy, so the TCP layers are still attached to the sockbuf structure. 3. When the second connection is opened, a new TCP layer is added to the sockbuf structure, but the existing one is still there. Both now point to the updated sockbuf structure, with the new file descriptor. 4. When the connection is closed, the layers attached to the sockbuf close the new file descriptor twice. This may be the same problem as https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-devel@openldap.org/thre… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 10153] New: slapd(8) manpage does not describe -T modify (slapmodify)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10153 Issue ID: 10153 Summary: slapd(8) manpage does not describe -T modify (slapmodify) Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: fumiyas(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 998 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=998&action=edit [PATCH] slapd(8) describe -T modify (slapmodify) OpenLDAP 2.5+ slapd(8) add `-T modify` option, but its manpage does not describe it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10123] New: Allow compilation with new compilers
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10123 Issue ID: 10123 Summary: Allow compilation with new compilers Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- With clang 16 at least, slapd fails to compile servers/slapd/controls.c (missing an include of ac/ctype.h) and emits a large amount of warnings stemming from include/ac/* redefining existing functions in a K&R way (which apparently is not compatible with C2x). A fix is coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10109] New: [slapd] Segmentation fault
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10109 Issue ID: 10109 Summary: [slapd] Segmentation fault Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Windows Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sfhacker(a)hotmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 984 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=984&action=edit Backtrace Hi. OpenLDAP 2.6.6 built from source on Windows 10 x64. When starting the server using a basic slapd.conf file, I get a segmentation fault (see screenshot attached). Thanks in advance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10110] New: Chained searches skip callbacks for returned entries
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 Issue ID: 10110 Summary: Chained searches skip callbacks for returned entries Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Regardless of overlay ordering, slapo-chain's handling of entries returned will skip any callbacks that have been registered on the operation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10076] New: suffixmassage in back-asyncmeta does not handle empty remote suffix correctly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076 Issue ID: 10076 Summary: suffixmassage in back-asyncmeta does not handle empty remote suffix correctly Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- When configuring a suffixmassage directive on an asyncmeta database, a configuration like: suffixmassage "dc=example,dc=com" "" causes search requests to return error 34 "Invalid DN", because the empty remote suffix is massaged incorrectly, adding an unnecessary ",". The issue applies only to asyncmeta, on other proxies it functions correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10139] back-config discloses existence of entries contrary to ACL
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Group|OpenLDAP-devs | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 29 Jan '24

29 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 --- Comment #11 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- commit d56dcccb6f6cfd590eb20628eec39ab815a65f5a Author: Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> Date: Sun Jan 28 04:43:44 2024 +0000 ITS#7420 clarify prev commit commit 03338946b3e165e3c703c57cede266c42418cc1f Author: Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> Date: Sun Jan 28 04:00:34 2024 +0000 ITS#7420 more for prev commit On naming error, don't free modvals -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Jan '24

25 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #28 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #27) > (In reply to Quanah Gibson-Mount from comment #26) > > Additionally, this was clearly documented in the UPGRADE section of the Admin guide. > > Specifically, in the OpenLDAP 2.5 admin guide section on upgrading from > OpenLDAP 2.4 or prior releases. https://www.openldap.org/doc/admin25/appendix-upgrading.html#Client%20utili… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs January 2024