openldap-bugs July 2022

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
113 discussions

[Issue 9496] New: Some writes missing from database
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Mar '23

15 Mar '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9496 Issue ID: 9496 Summary: Some writes missing from database Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: igfoo(a)github.com Target Milestone: --- With the attached test program, some of my database writes appear not to actually be written to the database. For example, a run may look like this: $ ./run.sh All done. All finished 1802 test.txt foo_200 is missing bar_200 is missing foo_404 is missing bar_404 is missing foo_407 is missing bar_407 is missing The script that I am using to run the program is below. This is using mdb.master 52bc29ee2efccf09c650598635cd42a50b6ecffe on Linux, with an ext4 filesystem. Is this an LMDB bug, or is there a bug in my code? Thanks Ian #!/bin/sh set -e if ! [ -d lmdb ] then rm -rf lmdb git clone https://github.com/LMDB/lmdb.git INSTALL_DIR="`pwd`/inst" cd lmdb/libraries/liblmdb make install prefix="$INSTALL_DIR" cd ../../.. fi gcc -Wall -Werror -Iinst/include loop.c inst/lib/liblmdb.a -o loop -pthread rm -f test.db test.db-lock ./loop echo "All finished" mdb_dump -np test.db > test.txt wc -l test.txt for i in `seq 100 999` do if ! grep -q "foo_$i" test.txt then echo "foo_$i is missing" fi if ! grep -q "bar_$i" test.txt then echo "bar_$i is missing" fi done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 16

[Issue 9887] New: Offer to mirror OpenLDAP
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 Feb '23

13 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9887 Issue ID: 9887 Summary: Offer to mirror OpenLDAP Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mirrors(a)jevincanders.net Target Milestone: --- Greetings, We're from Jevin Canders, a hosting company based in New York (servers are in Buffalo). We're wondering if you wanted/needed another US mirror. We're already mirroring other open source projects, including Kali Linux and F-Droid. As of next week (tentatively), our mirror server will have a 20 Gbps pipe to work with, so we'll be able to handle new projects. Let us know if you have any questions, concerns, or requests. Sincerely, Josh Anders and Kevin Croissant JC Mirrors Team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9880] New: reqStart filter with trailing zeros is truncated, which breaks certain searches
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9880 Issue ID: 9880 Summary: reqStart filter with trailing zeros is truncated, which breaks certain searches Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: subbarao(a)computer.org Target Milestone: --- Note: ITS#9358 seems to address this very issue, but it doesn't seem to help this particular case. Certain range searches with reqStart on the changelog don't work as expected. For example: (!(reqStart<=20220707123456.000000Z)) The idea here is to grab all entries strictly greater than the timestamp. But slapd truncates zeros in this filter, rewriting it to: (!(reqStart<=20220707123456Z)) As a result, the reqStart=20220707123456.000000Z entry is the first match since it is greater than 20220707123456Z, which is not the desired behavior. I was able to reproduce this issue on 2.5.12 as follows: 1) Start the test043-delta-syncrepl test, let it run almost to the end so that it makes many changes, and then hit ^Z to suspend the script. I waited until one of the last occurrences of "Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes". 2) pkill -CONT -f slapd to restart slapd (but not the test script) 3) ldapsearch -x -h localhost:9011 -b cn=log objectclass=top | grep '^dn:.*.000000Z' Look for a change with all trailing zeros. It's not as rare as one might think, I saw at least one trailing-zeros change in two consecutive runs of the test script. I suppose you could also just create an entry with all trailing zeros in the accesslog :-) 4) Run a range search to only return changes after that change (I used -z 1 and -s one so that it would only give me one result): ldapsearch -x -z 1 -h localhost:9011 -b cn=log -s one '(!(reqStart<=20220708012121.000000Z))' If you see the same entry, then the problem is present. 5) Even if you can't have an accesslog entry with all trailing zeros, you can still do the above search verbatim and look at the slapd log file testrun/slapd.1.log: 62c7873f.145b4396 0x7fabf14c9700 conn=1011 op=1 SRCH base="cn=log" scope=1 deref =0 filter="(!(reqStart<=20220708012121Z))" The filter being rewritten in the server log seems to indicate that trailing zeros are being truncated somewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9860] New: ldapsearch memory leaks
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860 Issue ID: 9860 Summary: ldapsearch memory leaks Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- When using page control, The control value leaks with each goto getNextPage; loop due to `i` and `nctrl` step back. ``` 1114 getNextPage: ... 1124 save_nctrls = nctrls; 1125 i = nctrls; ``` ``` 1284 if ( ldap_create_page_control_value( ld, 1285 pageSize, &pr_cookie, &c[i].ldctl_value ) ) ``` ``` 1445 /* step back to the original number of controls, so that 1446 * those set while parsing args are preserved */ 1447 nctrls = save_nctrls; ``` ``` 1612 goto getNextPage; ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9718] New: test022 can fail on expiry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jan '23

30 Jan '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9718 Issue ID: 9718 Summary: test022 can fail on expiry Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- >>>>> Starting test022-ppolicy for mdb... running defines.sh Starting slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that slapd is running... Testing redundant ppolicy instance... Using ldapadd to populate the database... Testing account lockout... Waiting 13 seconds for lockout to reset... Testing password expiration Waiting seconds for password to expire... sleep: missing operand Try 'sleep --help' for more information. Password expiration test failed >>>>> test022-ppolicy failed for mdb after 43 seconds (exit 1) The issue here is apparently that line 122-123 failed to populate the DELAY variable. 121 122 DELAY=`$LDAPSEARCH -D "$MANAGERDN" -H $URI1 -w $PASSWD \ 123 -b "$USER" -E accountUsability 1.1 | sed -n -e 's/.*expire=$\d*$/\1/p'` 124 125 echo "Testing password expiration" 126 echo "Waiting $DELAY seconds for password to expire..." 127 sleep $DELAY 128 sleep 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9600] New: Rework lloadd's cn=monitor interface (connections)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Dec '22

12 Dec '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9600 Issue ID: 9600 Summary: Rework lloadd's cn=monitor interface (connections) Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- At the moment, most of the lloadd's monitor entries are generated on demand for the search. To support management of the server and its connections, an entry should be created when a connection is set up and torn down accordingly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 9806] New: MDB_PAGE_FULL on mdb_put
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9806 Issue ID: 9806 Summary: MDB_PAGE_FULL on mdb_put Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: Mac OS Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: casey(a)rodarmor.com Target Milestone: --- I'm using the using latest lmdb from OpenLDAP, commit e8813b12b6188d5ba5f174ff8726c438c8ca4bfd. I'm getting an MDB_PAGE_FULL error after calling `mdb_put`. If I delete the database and perform the same sequence of inserts, I get the same error in on the same mdb_put. If there's any information I can provide to help debug this, let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9365] New: Mem leaks with Æ-DIR providers
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Oct '22

03 Oct '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9365 Issue ID: 9365 Summary: Mem leaks with Æ-DIR providers Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 772 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=772&action=edit valgrind output on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64 An Æ-DIR installation with self-compiled OpenLDAP 2.4.53 on Debian (now buster) has memory leak issues on the Æ-DIR providers. The read-only consumers do not have this issue. The provider config is more complex with more overlays and more ACLs. In this production deployment slapd is automatically restarted (by monit) when memory consumption reaches 80%. Thus monitoring clearly shows a frequent saw tooth pattern. I've also tested on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64 with a RE24 build [1] by running slapd under control of valgrind for a couple of minutes continously sending simple bind operations (additional to the monitoring and other back-ground jobs running). Find valgrind output of my first attempt attached. Does that make sense at all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9878] New: test043 failures in 2.5/2.6
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Sep '22

26 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9878 Issue ID: 9878 Summary: test043 failures in 2.5/2.6 Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- With test043 update for ITS#9823, we manage to introduce a scenario where the server is completely idle except for a runqueue change. This is partly identical with ITS#9642 and a similar approach would work. Except that changes our module facing ABI so might not be something we can backport. For the streams we can't, we might have to change the test to make the server not idle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9524] New: Removing last entry in database triggers MDB_PROBLEM
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 Sep '22

21 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9524 Issue ID: 9524 Summary: Removing last entry in database triggers MDB_PROBLEM Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kriszyp(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- With a fresh database, if you have have an open read transaction, and you create a new entry in a write transaction and commit it, and then create a new transaction and delete that entry, when you commit, it will return an MDB_PROBLEM from approximately line 4408 from the mt_loose_count/dirty_list check. This seems to occur on mdb.master3, but not mdb.master. Here is a minimal example/test-case of how to reproduce: MDB_env* env; mdb_env_create(&env); int rc, flags = 0; mdb_env_open(env, "test", flags, 0664); MDB_txn* readonly_txn; mdb_txn_begin(env, nullptr, MDB_RDONLY, &readonly_txn); MDB_txn* txn; MDB_dbi dbi; mdb_txn_begin(env, nullptr, 0, &txn); mdb_dbi_open(txn, nullptr, MDB_CREATE, &dbi); MDB_val val; val.mv_data = (void*) "test"; val.mv_size = 4; mdb_put(txn, dbi, &val, &val, 0); mdb_txn_commit(txn); mdb_txn_begin(env, nullptr, 0, &txn); mdb_del(txn, dbi, &val, nullptr); rc = mdb_txn_commit(txn); // this returns MDB_PROBLEM (let me know if this should be submitted differently) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs July 2022