https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9868
Issue ID: 9868
Summary: backglue and syncprov must use same pending_csn_list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.12
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
When replication is performed on a glued DB hierarchy the syncprov overlay must
only be configured on the top DB. But when writes occur on a subDB their CSNs
will be queued on the subDB's be_pending_csn_list. When syncprov sees these
writes it will try to graduate these CSNs from the top DB's
be_pending_csn_list, but never find them there. The CSN list will grow without
bound.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9726
Issue ID: 9726
Summary: Admin guide and man pages need better documentation on
disabling syslog
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
2.6.0 added the new feature allowing using a logfile for all debug/loglevel
messages and bypassing syslog entirely. However, there is no documentation on
the new settings or examples of how to do this in the admin guide, and the man
page sections on the new parameters for the logfile side do not note at
when/how they enable bypassing syslog.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9782
Issue ID: 9782
Summary: regression test its8752 failure
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
If a contextCSN update (new cookie) goes from server A through server B to
server C, server C will use that CSN to update entryCSN as well (which neither
A nor B did). This fails the initial replication check.
The issue has likely existed since deltasync was made possible, a version of
this is confirmed at least in 2.4.60 onwards to current master. In principle,
it is related to concerns raised in ITS#9580.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8752
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s
| |how_bug.cgi?id=9782
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9534
Issue ID: 9534
Summary: Persistent test043 failures
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
In testing current RE25 as of 4/23/2021
(73b2769d05529a7d474661023f2c4f3a931417b2)
test043 is sporadically failing. Examining the testrun log, it appears
replication never even initiated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9877
Issue ID: 9877
Summary: Session Tracking failing to log IP addresses
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
From slapd log in master with session tracking enabled:
62c45cfe.3b59f358 0x7fa3b0aa8700 conn=1002 fd=15 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.1:58790
(IP=127.0.0.1:9012)
62c45cff.017af6f5 0x7fa3b0aa8700 conn=1002 op=1 [IP=[
USERNAME=cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com] modifications:
62c45cff.017b2c53 0x7fa3b0aa8700 conn=1002 op=1 [IP=[
USERNAME=cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com] MOD dn="cn=replicator,dc=example,dc=com"
62c45cff.017bb35e 0x7fa3b0aa8700 conn=1002 op=1 [IP=[
USERNAME=cn=manager,dc=example,dc=com] MOD attr=pwdLastSuccess
Note the missing IP address. This works correctly in current 2.6.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
Issue ID: 9874
Summary: slapadd is returning garbage error data
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
When slapadd encounters an error, instead of returning that error it is
returning garbage text.
Example:
slapadd: could not add entry dn="olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config" (line=1119): #]I
Note the: "#]I"
If run with -d -1, we see the actual error is:
mdb_db_init: Initializing mdb database
olcDbDirectory: value #0: invalid path: No such file or directory
slapadd: could not add entry dn="olcDatabase={1}mdb,cn=config" (line=1119):
olcDbDirectory: value #0: invalid path: No such file or directory
slapadd shutdown: initiated
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642
Issue ID: 9642
Summary: Adding a task to runqueue doesn't wake the main thread
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
If a connection adds a new syncrepl stanza, that is not started until the main
thread comes around to doing it. However if that thread is currently stuck in
SLAP_EVENT_WAIT() and nothing else happens (like an unbind over the connection
that modified the config), the task is never started. This can take a long
time.
No idea yet how to wake it up with/from ldap_pvt_runqueue_insert() given that
sits within libldap and not really something that should be calling
slap_wake_listener().
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.