May 2022 - openldap-bugs

[Issue 9842] New: Page should not be spilled if MDB_RESERVE is used

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9842 Issue ID: 9842 Summary: Page should not be spilled if MDB_RESERVE is used Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stephan.j.bircher(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- The documentation for the function mdb_cursor_put states for MDB_RESERVE the following: "return a pointer to the reserved space, which the caller can fill in later". However this seems only to be valid if no other operation is performed on the cursor. Once the cursor is moved the page where the reserved data resides on might become untracked and therefore eligible to be spilled at any time. This problems occurrs however only for large transactions where lmdb starts to spill and flush pages. I'm using only lmdb and I'm a bit confused as the branches master (https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/tree/master/libraries/liblmdb) and mdb.master (https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/tree/mdb.master/libraries/li...) are not the same. For example the function mdb_pages_xkeep differs and master and mdb.master. Will the branches be consolidated again? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

10 months, 4 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Issue 8882] Empty Directory String Overlay

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Null Attribute Value |Empty Directory String |Overlay |Overlay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 8882] Null Attribute Value Overlay

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #15 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/523 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 8882] Null Attribute Value Overlay

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

10 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 9830] New: slapd using more memory on linux kernel 5.xx then kernel 4.19

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9830 Issue ID: 9830 Summary: slapd using more memory on linux kernel 5.xx then kernel 4.19 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: pavel.mamonov(a)wildix.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, there After upgrade a debian distro from 10 to 11 we are faced with consumption of memory more then before. We testing on the same system with different kernels. ======================================== System with a kernel 4.19: using of memory (slapd) ~ 100-120mb (max) slapd 2.4.59 libc6:amd64 2.31-13+deb11u2 linux-image-4.19.0-14-cloud-amd64 4.19.171-2 ======================================== System with a kernel 5.10: using of memory (slapd) ~ 135-235mb (max) slapd 2.4.59 libc6:amd64 2.31-13+deb11u2 linux-image-5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64 5.10.84-1 ======================================== Also we tried to use other allocator of memory like "libtcmalloc-minimal4:amd64 2.8.1-1" - but, unfortunately, it does not help us. Could you give advice what we can do for optimize memory and reduction using of it ? If need additional info please, let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

10 months, 4 weeks

1
3
0 / 0

[Issue 9832] New: back-monitor crash when sizelimit in operation

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9832 Issue ID: 9832 Summary: back-monitor crash when sizelimit in operation Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If a back-monitor search gets a failure in send_search_entry(), e.g. due to sizelimit being reached, a pending server pause, etc., it will try to call monitor_cache_release( mi, e ) where e == NULL instead of the correct entry to release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Issue 9675] New: Allow overwriting the default SLAPD_DEFAULT_CONFIGDIR during ./configure

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9675 Issue ID: 9675 Summary: Allow overwriting the default SLAPD_DEFAULT_CONFIGDIR during ./configure Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 839 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=839&action=edit fix I want to have different default for SLAPD_DEFAULT_CONFIGDIR in my slapd. By calling CPPFLAGS="-DSLAPD_DEFAULT_CONFIGDIR='\"/new/config/dir/\"'" ./configure one can change the default configdir in slapd. Provided that the macro SLAPD_DEFAULT_CONFIGDIR is not changed in the code, which is ensured by the provided patch. Macro SLAPD_DEFAULT_UCDATA is not used anywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

11 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Issue 9436] New: OpenSSL 3.0: libldap uses depreciated functions

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9436 Issue ID: 9436 Summary: OpenSSL 3.0: libldap uses depreciated functions Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- OpenLDAP master fails to build against OpenSSL 3.0 alpha when "no-deprecated" is specified. Currently hitting these errors: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_get_peer_certificate' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `PEM_read_bio_DHparams' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ERR_get_error_line' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `DH_free' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh' Notes: SSL_get_peer_certificate is SSL_get1_peer_certificate in 3.0.0 SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh should be replaced as follows: # define SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh(ctx,dh) \ SSL_CTX_ctrl(ctx,SSL_CTRL_SET_TMP_DH,0,(char *)(dh)) Have to dig deeper for: PEM_read_bio_DHparams ERR_get_error_line DH_free -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

11 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Issue 9814] New: upgrade ppm to 2.1 release

by openldap-its＠openldap.org

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Issue ID: 9814 Summary: upgrade ppm to 2.1 release Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I have just opened two new MR to upgrade ppm to 2.1 release: * for OpenLDAP 2.5: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/509 * for OpenLDAP 2.6: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/510 Changes: - Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

11 months

1
8
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs May 2022