https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9556
Issue ID: 9556
Summary: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if
parsing schema description fails
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.4
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm currently testing error handling and interacting with LDAP clients (e.g. my
web2ldap).
Sending an invalid attribute type description results in an error (as expected)
returned by slapd-config:
RESULT tag=103 err=80 qtime=0.000032 etime=0.001271 text=olcAttributeTypes:
Unexpected token before SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
But result code other(80) seems not very useful. It's too unspecific to decide
on specific error handling.
It would be much more useful if slapd-config returns invalidAttributeSyntax(21)
in this case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9576
Issue ID: 9576
Summary: Add ConfigTable link into ConfigArgs
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Would make it possible to examine defaults if necessary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493
Issue ID: 9493
Summary: slapo-accesslog handling of deletion of multi-valued
configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: svella(a)technologist.com
Target Milestone: ---
I observed this in the debugger while working on a small feature addition to
slapo-accesslog.
log_cf_gen(), when handling the initial configuration of oldAccessLogOldAttr
(accesslog.c:989), linked list li_oldattrs is being built by inserting each
value in order at the head of the list, resulting in the list being in reverse
order. But when handling LDAP_MOD_DELETE of same attribute (accesslog.c:989),
it is using the index of the removed value (valx) to find and removed the entry
in the linked list, but it's counting from the head of li_oldattrs and not the
tail, resulting in the wrong item being removed from the list unless counting
from the head or the tail happens find the same item.
(Line numbers refer to commit 6c469f07935e351e349bf38fc223dab704c51a76)
Handling of oldAccessLogBase appears to have the same problem, and a cursory
glance through the source of other overlays reveals a similar pattern, and I'm
guessing the same problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282
Issue ID: 9282
Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.50
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Scenario:
2 node Multi-provider replication
Add database to provider A
ensure database replicates to provider B
Stop provider A
delete entry on provider B
Start provider A
Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A
Deleted entry re-appears
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9492
Issue ID: 9492
Summary: Add local logging capa
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: mhardin(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
Enhancement request: Add capability to slapd to log to a local file with log
rotation features. Log format should not change from syslog-generated log
style.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9641
Issue ID: 9641
Summary: accesslog when logging failed operations interferes
with deltasync
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: replication
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Take delta-MPR setup and accesslog configured with logsuccess off. We encounter
a conflicting write (one that fails to apply in the DB) and fall back to plain
syncrepl. Since we are configured to log that write, syncprov sees it (it is a
failure, so doesn't match filter, which should contain reqResult=0) and sends a
LDAP_SYNC_NEW_COOKIE with that CSN to our delta-consumers. While we apply this
write locally in the fallback session, the consumers will skip what they see as
a duplicate and lose the change.
My understanding is that for failed operations, we should ignore the CSN we
received with the operation and instead set up a new one (with our own sid).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9700
Issue ID: 9700
Summary: Need to determine new library ABI versioning starting
point
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
With the change in how OpenLDAP client libraries are versioned vs prior
releases, we need to determine a useful starting point for the current ABI
prior to release.
Since current libldap is versioned as libldap.so.2, we may want to start with
ol_api_current=2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9666
Issue ID: 9666
Summary: 2.5 to 2.6 upgrade documentation
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Need to document any upgrade issues for going from 2.5 to 2.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9575
Issue ID: 9575
Summary: Object class olcGlobal should not allow
olcPasswordHash
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
Object class olcGlobal should not allow olcPasswordHash because slapd will
crash during start if attribute is set.
Reported in this thread:
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9536
Issue ID: 9536
Summary: back-asyncmeta crashes when traffic is directed to a
new database, created via cn=config
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
A new back-asyncmeta database is successfully created via cn=config, but the
first LDAP request it tries to proxy causes a segmentation fault:
0# 0x00007F4C1E346629 in
/usr/src/backend/src/main/c++/overlay-proxy/.libs/overlay_proxy-2.4.so.0
1# 0x00007F4C26D701E0 in /lib64/libc.so.6
2# pthread_mutex_lock in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
3# ldap_pvt_thread_mutex_lock in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
4# asyncmeta_getconn in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
5# asyncmeta_back_add in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
6# fe_op_add in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
7# overlay_op_walk in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
8# 0x00000000004D8EFB in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
9# 0x00000000004D90DC in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
10# do_add in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
11# 0x0000000000445B20 in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
12# 0x00000000004460FB in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
13# 0x0000000000563C54 in /usr/local/libexec/slapd
14# 0x00007F4C270FB569 in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
15# clone in /lib64/libc.so.6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.