https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8668
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
I was able to reproduce the behavior, but there is no bug here.
You're seeing the old entry because it's left over from a previous run of
slapd.
The pcache overlay will forget what it knows about the cache contents on a
restart, unless you configure pcachePersist. When you enable this setting,
then it remembers its cached queries across restarts and will expire old
entries instead of returning them in new search requests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9251
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, reviewed |
--- Comment #8 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• f1ebb456
by Howard Chu at 2021-03-22T17:31:13+00:00
ITS#9251 make max filter depth configurable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9251
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
added config keyword in master
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6206
--- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Gavin Henry from comment #4)
> I think these are now them:
>
> https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/service-ldap
Yes, but there is no mention of any auxiliary/contrib stuff on that page at
all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9421
Issue ID: 9421
Summary: SIGSEGV in the MMR synchro
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.56
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: benjamin.demarteau(a)liege.be
Target Milestone: ---
We are in the process of migrating from a single outdated node to an up to date
MMR cluster. Through this process we write LSC synchronizations from the old
server to the new server so we can keep the old server around.
Our preliminary tests show that when LSC hammers the ldap using multiple
threads while another node is included in the replication, we get segmentation
faults with the following backtrace:
#0 0x00007f7f578748ef in __strncasecmp_l_avx () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x000056094a7ca298 in avl_find (root=0x56094bb28820,
data=data@entry=0x7f7e74000cd0, fcmp=fcmp@entry=0x56094a7166a0
<oc_index_name_cmp>) at avl.c:545
#2 0x000056094a716bde in oc_bvfind (ocname=0x7f7e74000cd0) at oc.c:186
#3 oc_bvfind (ocname=ocname@entry=0x7f7e74000cd0) at oc.c:178
#4 0x000056094a70ec5a in objectSubClassMatch (matchp=0x7f7e5fff8c8c,
flags=256, syntax=<optimized out>, mr=<optimized out>, value=<optimized out>,
assertedValue=0x7f7e74000cd0) at schema_prep.c:214
#5 0x000056094a6e9fb9 in ordered_value_match
(match=match@entry=0x7f7e5fff8c8c, ad=0x56094bb184e0,
mr=mr@entry=0x56094bb09810, flags=flags@entry=256, v1=v1@entry=0x7f7e5810f470,
v2=v2@entry=0x7f7e74000cd0,
text=0x7f7e5fff8c90) at value.c:693
#6 0x000056094a6ec44d in test_ava_filter (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff90c0,
e=e@entry=0x56094bb54a88, ava=0x7f7e74000cc8, type=type@entry=163) at
filterentry.c:777
#7 0x000056094a6ecfec in test_filter (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff90c0,
e=e@entry=0x56094bb54a88, f=f@entry=0x7f7e74000d08) at filterentry.c:88
#8 0x000056094a6ecc81 in test_filter_and (flist=<optimized out>,
e=0x56094bb54a88, op=0x7f7e5fff90c0) at filterentry.c:879
#9 test_filter (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff90c0, e=0x56094bb54a88, f=<optimized
out>) at filterentry.c:118
#10 0x00007f7f5382c58f in syncprov_matchops (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
opc=opc@entry=0x7f7e58001808, saveit=saveit@entry=0) at syncprov.c:1393
#11 0x00007f7f5382e37f in syncprov_op_response (op=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
rs=<optimized out>) at syncprov.c:2115
#12 0x000056094a6dcb98 in slap_response_play (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
rs=rs@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c10) at result.c:508
#13 0x000056094a6dd11c in send_ldap_response (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
rs=rs@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c10) at result.c:583
#14 0x000056094a6ddd43 in slap_send_ldap_result (op=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
rs=0x7f7e5fff9c10) at result.c:861
#15 0x000056094a7a86fd in mdb_add (op=0x7f7e5fff9c80, rs=0x7f7e5fff9c10) at
add.c:435
#16 0x000056094a73cd78 in overlay_op_walk (op=op@entry=0x7f7e5fff9c80,
rs=0x7f7e5fff9c10, which=op_add, oi=0x56094bb8a720, on=<optimized out>) at
backover.c:677
#17 0x000056094a73ceab in over_op_func (op=0x7f7e5fff9c80, rs=<optimized out>,
which=<optimized out>) at backover.c:730
#18 0x00007f7f5361ff6a in accesslog_response (op=<optimized out>, rs=<optimized
out>) at accesslog.c:1877
#19 0x000056094a6dcb98 in slap_response_play (op=op@entry=0x7f7e7410fff0,
rs=rs@entry=0x7f7e5fffa870) at result.c:508
#20 0x000056094a6dd11c in send_ldap_response (op=op@entry=0x7f7e7410fff0,
rs=rs@entry=0x7f7e5fffa870) at result.c:583
#21 0x000056094a6ddd43 in slap_send_ldap_result (op=0x7f7e7410fff0,
rs=0x7f7e5fffa870) at result.c:861
#22 0x000056094a7a86fd in mdb_add (op=0x7f7e7410fff0, rs=0x7f7e5fffa870) at
add.c:435
#23 0x000056094a73cd78 in overlay_op_walk (op=op@entry=0x7f7e7410fff0,
rs=0x7f7e5fffa870, which=op_add, oi=0x56094bb8a900, on=<optimized out>) at
backover.c:677
#24 0x000056094a73ceab in over_op_func (op=0x7f7e7410fff0, rs=<optimized out>,
which=<optimized out>) at backover.c:730
#25 0x000056094a6d32bd in fe_op_add (op=0x7f7e7410fff0, rs=0x7f7e5fffa870) at
add.c:334
#26 0x000056094a6d4139 in do_add (op=0x7f7e7410fff0, rs=0x7f7e5fffa870) at
add.c:194
#27 0x000056094a6cbfc0 in connection_operation (ctx=ctx@entry=0x7f7e5fffaab0,
arg_v=arg_v@entry=0x7f7e7410fff0) at connection.c:1175
#28 0x000056094a6ccdbe in connection_read_thread (ctx=0x7f7e5fffaab0,
argv=0x1a) at connection.c:1311
#29 0x00007f7f5903bead in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0x56094bb2a1d0)
at tpool.c:696
#30 0x00007f7f57ae414a in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#31 0x00007f7f57815f23 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
If we take down the second node, we cannot reproduce the segfaults anymore.
Let me know if we can provide more information (we can't provide the core dump
since it's full of passwords).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9347
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |---
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9045
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ, replication, |
|reviewed |
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9001
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.