https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9180
--- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #3)
> What's done by c4eaa5416dcc45e8d7c768a46d5bbf9fe154a308 looks to be enough?
No, as per comment#2, the man page should be updated to note that the memberOf
overlay is deprecated and that dynlist should be used as an alternative. ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9102
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |TEST
Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.5.2
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Commits:
• d3fca136
by Ondřej Kuzník at 2021-02-17T13:24:00+00:00
ITS#9102 Update secprop documentation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9180
--- Comment #3 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
What's done by c4eaa5416dcc45e8d7c768a46d5bbf9fe154a308 looks to be enough?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8865
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |bugs(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org from comment #8)
> c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" I have seen but I was unsure because the license seemed
> OpenLDAP specific to me (but probably partially text was taken from a more
> general one as the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE).
There was one instance that's fixed in the merge request that did need fixing.
The other one is in include/sysexits-compat.h, that one is an ancient
University of Berkeley license:
/* Portions Copyright (c) 1987 Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted
* provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
* duplicated in all such forms and that any documentation,
* advertising materials, and other materials related to such
* distribution and use acknowledge that the software was developed
* by the University of California, Berkeley. The name of the
* University may not be used to endorse or promote products derived
* from this software without specific prior written permission.
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
*
* @(#)sysexits.h 4.5 (Berkeley) 7/6/88
*/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #8 from jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org <jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org> ---
Ah yes,
a) "everytime" I have overseen
b) "tread" I have also overseen (it's also in my eyes a bug in "codespell" so I
try to detect such kind of false positives manually)
c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" I have seen but I was unsure because the license seemed
OpenLDAP specific to me (but probably partially text was taken from a more
general one as the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE).
The liblmdb library is now excluded.
In doc/drafts only draft*.txt files were excluded but since there draft*.xml
files were added, now all drafts* files in that directory are excluded. But the
README file is still scanned ;-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466
Issue ID: 9466
Summary: Since glibc 2.33 slapd shall initialize NSS before
calling chroot
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org
Target Milestone: ---
I use openldap 2.4 within chroot on a LFS. I call `slapd -r /home/openldap` .
With glibc 2.32 it worked fine without running nscd. Since I upgraded (on the
host, thus outside the chrooted environment) slapd cannot work without running
nscd (on the host, which socket is bind-mounted to /var/run/nscd/socket in the
chrooted environment).
As outlined at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077 slapd
shall first utilize NSS, e.g. by calling getpwuid or utilizing the host
database, and then chroot(2).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Oh, anything in doc/drafts should be ignored. These are IETF RFC drafts that
are copied verbatim. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9161
--- Comment #5 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
(In reply to jens.schleusener(a)fossies.org from comment #4)
> Great, looks nuch better.
>
> I have generated two new reports but "only" in a special "test" folder that
> isn't integrated into the Fossies standard services and should also not be
> accessible by search engines. Additionally the pages aren't linked so the
> reports are probably not visible to "normal" users.
That's great, thanks!
I had the following notes after going through the report yesterday:
a) "everytime" is a configuration keyword to a module, therefore it is correct.
b) "tread" is actually output to fprintf, and the actual line is:
" -T file\tread file for new password\n"
so this is clearly a tab followed by the word "read". This seems like a bug
in the report generator, as it should be able to understand items like this
(note that it doesn't report password\n as an error, for example, which is
essentially the same thing).
c) "MERCHANTIBILITY" is a typo from someone else's license statement that we
cannot fix as we have to reproduce the license text without modification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.