openldap-bugs February 2021

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
522 discussions

[Issue 8474] Securely Erase BerElement Buffer After Use
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8474 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8375] paged results control results in full db search?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8375 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- followed with: AFAICT the else statement with the debug statement is hit because the "RESULT\n" line is not really consumed before the while loop (line 1671) and that results in this wrong output. s is still at the beginning of "RESULT\n" line when entering the while loop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8255] slapd-sock: response parsing in str2result() is broken
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8255 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- list message: I'm trying to find out why slapd-socks always outputs all lines returned by the external sock listeners with comment "unknown" although everything seems to work correctly. ----------------------------- snip ----------------------------- 5603fc08 conn=1000 op=1 BIND dn="uid=äöüÄÖÜß,ou=realdb,dc=example,dc=org" method=128 5603fc08 str2result (msgid: 2 code: 49 matched: uid=äöüÄÖÜß,ou=realdb,dc=example,dc=org info: You loose! (wrong password) ) unknown 5603fc08 str2result ( ) unknown 5603fc08 conn=1000 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=49 text= You loose! (wrong password) ----------------------------- snip ----------------------------- The (correct) Python string returned by the listener was: 'RESULT\nmsgid: 2\ncode: 49\nmatched: uid=\xc3\xa4\xc3\xb6\xc3\xbc\xc3\x84\xc3\x96\xc3\x9c\xc3\x9f,ou=realdb,dc=example,dc=org\ninfo: You loose! (wrong password)\n\n' I tried to understand what's going on in str2result() (in file servers/slapd/result.c) but failed. AFAICS in slapd-sock(5) the external listener should always return a line with "code: <digit>" after the "RESULT" line. But to me it seems that the function would return with rc=0 if there's only a single "RESULT" line (due to break in line 1674). And I also can't see why the else clause in 1727 is reached. I wonder whether slapd-sock is confused by the two trailing line feeds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8254] RFE: slapd-sock: more request and return parameters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8254 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8229] ldapsearch: report failed search results to stderr even when ldif == 0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8229 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Fix for 2.6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8197] slapo-constraint and delold=0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8197 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.5.3 |2.6.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8197] slapo-constraint and delold=0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8197 --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- List message: When bulk-renaming entries in web2ldap I do *not* alter the RDN of the entry but also send delold: 0 in the MODRDN operation. IMO this is most minimal invasive approach. This works ok in most setups. But in a more strict setup (release 2.4.41) with slapo-constraint and constraints on the RDN's characteristic attribute those MODRDN requests trigger a constraint and fails with 'Constraint violation' although the RDN value is not changed. I can't tell whether this was different with older OpenLDAP releases. Even more strange: It works with delold: 1. So I could easily alter web2ldap's behaviour to send delold: 1. But I'm not sure whether that's the right general approach especially when thinking about all the other LDAP servers out there. So the question is: Is this an overzealous misbehaviour of slapo-constraint and should it be fixed therein? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8183] ldap_init() failed at sub thread but runs ok at main.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8183 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Target Milestone|2.5.3 |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8183] ldap_init() failed at sub thread but runs ok at main.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8183 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FEEDBACK --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Can you reproduce this with the OpenLDAP 2.5 alpha? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
53
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs February 2021