openldap-bugs November 2021

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
119 discussions

[Issue 9728] New: For lastbind-precision, note it is important in busy replicated environments
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9728 Issue ID: 9728 Summary: For lastbind-precision, note it is important in busy replicated environments Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- It would be good to note in the slapd.conf(5)/slapd-config(5) man pages that the lastbind-precision setting can be very important to set in busy, replicated environments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9727] New: slapd-watcher fails to start if any slapd instance is down
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9727 Issue ID: 9727 Summary: slapd-watcher fails to start if any slapd instance is down Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- When starting slapd-watcher and slapd isn't running on one of the monitored servers, slapd-watcher fails to start: Example w/host2 slapd not running: [user@host]# slapd-watcher -xD dc=example,dc=com -w secret -b dc=example,dc=com -s 1,2 ldap://host1/ ldap://host2/ slapd-watcher PID=11892: ldap_sasl_bind_s: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) I would expect that slapd-watcher would start up completely and indicate the host was down, like in the case where a host goes down while slapd-watcher is running. This would allow slapd-watcher to start when one or more replication node is down for maintenance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9733] New: ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9733 Issue ID: 9733 Summary: ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’ Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: smillerdev(a)me.com Target Milestone: --- On both Linux and macOS in Homebrew, there is a failure trying to compile OpenLDAP 2.6.0: /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=disable-shared --mode=compile gcc-5 -g -O2 -I../../../include -I../../../include -I.. -I./.. -I./../slapi -c log.c ppolicy.c:66:2: error: unknown type name ‘lt_dlhandle’ lt_dlhandle pwdCheckHandle; /* handle from lt_dlopen */ ^ on macOS there is also an additional errror: ppolicy.c:458:4: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant (void *)offsetof(pp_info,hash_passwords), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ See https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/88036 for the full output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9691] New: Allow syncrepl persist sessions against empty DBs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691 Issue ID: 9691 Summary: Allow syncrepl persist sessions against empty DBs Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review, replication Severity: enhancement Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- One way to set up an environment is to start with a completely empty DB, configure all nodes and replication paths and then populate them. Right now, the syncrepl sessions get rejected with a 32 NO_SUCH_OBJECT, triggering the retry cascade. Both the consumer and provider have an empty cookie, so they are in sync and we could actually transition to a persist phase and let the session proceed. This way the environment would start replicating almost immediately after first entries are added. Mind that ITS#9584 still pushes concurrent refreshes into the retry logic adding a short delay before *all* configured links are set up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9751] New: Delta-MPR resolution too eager to drop attribute deletes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9751 Issue ID: 9751 Summary: Delta-MPR resolution too eager to drop attribute deletes Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review, replication Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- syncrepl_resolve_cb will completely drop an attribute delete (or the delete part of replace) if there's a "newer" (timestamp-wise) op touching the same attribute. This way servers processing the "out of order" write end up keeping values that should have been removed (and have been on those that received it in the natural order). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9756] New: syncprov_play_accesslog doesn't check minCSN properly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9756 Issue ID: 9756 Summary: syncprov_play_accesslog doesn't check minCSN properly Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- When asked to replay the accesslog database for a refresh delete, syncprov doesn't interpret the minCSN data correctly, resulting in: - an inaccurate refresh if a purge removed some important data in the meantime - potentially a very expensive query when consumer is actually up to date w.r.t. to some sids in our contextCSN -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9752] New: Improperly normalized minCSN values in accesslog
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9752 Issue ID: 9752 Summary: Improperly normalized minCSN values in accesslog Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The CSN matching rules require normalized values to be provided. When normalized values are provided to attr_merge they must be distinct from the regular values. accesslog.c:1982 is providing the same berval in both regular and normalized value, which triggers an assert failure for this consistency check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9747] New: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Issue ID: 9747 Summary: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: henson(a)acm.org Target Milestone: --- Given the following group: dn: uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: cppGroup objectClass: posixGroup uid: unxadmin cn: Unix Administrators gidNumber: 17730 member: member: uid=gkuri,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu member: uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu memberUid: gkuri memberUid: henson and the following dynlist config: dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames ldap compare operations checking group membership fail erroneously: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu FALSE If the dynlist-attrset configuration is removed, the compare works as expected: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu TRUE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9749] New: logoldattr documentation is misleading
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 Issue ID: 9749 Summary: logoldattr documentation is misleading Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Reading the accesslog manpage, someone might expect that attributes specified in logoldattr would be logged regardless of whether the entry being modified matches any of the configured filters. This is not the case and should be clarified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9707] New: Documentation synchronisation ODSEE --> openldap
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9707 Issue ID: 9707 Summary: Documentation synchronisation ODSEE --> openldap Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: laurent.revillion(a)icloud.com Target Milestone: --- There is no documentation about the synchronisation between ODSEE and Openldap 2.5. Will there be one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 16

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs November 2021