openldap-bugs June 2020

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
198 discussions

[Issue 8182] setspec matching fails unexpectedly
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8182 --- Comment #2 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- Dealing with this would need access to the attribute type in the other set we're joining with so the literal 'canBrowse' could be normalised accordingly. But the way set ACLs are parsed at the moment, there is no way to keep and propagate this information. We might have to turn to a parser generator to get an AST and annotate accordingly if this is needed. That would in turn make us require YACC or whatever we chose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7089] ppolicy adds PWDFAILURETIME to organizationalUnit
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7089 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #7 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy related issues here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77 Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have any other comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8762] Unlocking an account doesn't remove pwdFailureTime
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8762 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #10 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy related issues here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77 Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have any other comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7084] Password Modify Extended Operation to set pwdReset: TRUE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7084 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #4 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy related issues here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77 Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have any other comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy related issues here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77 Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have any other comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 --- Comment #4 from Clément OUDOT <clement.oudot(a)worteks.com> --- I don't think this solves the issue. The problem is on entries that are not linked to any password policy are updated by ppolicy overlay. Adding a parameter in the password policy is not a good solution from my point of view. The entry should never be updated by ppolicy overlay if no ppolicy definition is applied to it. Note that this bug was opened 6 years ago, I did not test recent OpenLDAP versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 --- Comment #3 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- Hi Clément, this should still be possible if you set a default policy with pwdMaxRecordedFailure == 0, is there a reason this would not be appropriate before we go changing the default behaviour? Thanks, Ondrej -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8888] doc: sdf number disorder
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Jun '20

01 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8888 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 47974536 by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2020-06-01T19:05:26+00:00 Issue #8888 - Change numbered list to Note format -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs June 2020