https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9051
--- Comment #2 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Can't reproduce this in master or re24...
Compares don't get logged if logsuccess is on, that should probably be fixed
(including COMPARE_{TRUE,FALSE} and SASL_BIND_IN_PROGRESS as successes?)
Needs more information?
This is the minimal config where everything works (replace $ops accordingly):
database null
suffix cn=test
rootdn cn=test
rootpw pass
overlay accesslog
logdb cn=log
logops $ops
logsuccess off
database mdb
directory ./db
suffix cn=log
rootdn cn=test
overlay syncprov
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8143
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|slapd |libraries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5974
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
None of this applies to libldap(_r)/liblber in master anymore. Nor does slapd
seem to reference ldap_int_* symbols directly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Depends on| |8768
--- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Code to implement this is in a merge request here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/5
Referenced Issues:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
[Issue 8768] Syncprov shouldn't send a new cookie at the end of delete phase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |6467
Referenced Issues:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467
[Issue 6467] syncrepl enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |bugs(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8182
--- Comment #2 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Dealing with this would need access to the attribute type in the other set
we're joining with so the literal 'canBrowse' could be normalised accordingly.
But the way set ACLs are parsed at the moment, there is no way to keep and
propagate this information. We might have to turn to a parser generator to get
an AST and annotate accordingly if this is needed. That would in turn make us
require YACC or whatever we chose.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7089
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #7 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy
related issues here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77
Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have
any other comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8762
Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #10 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy
related issues here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77
Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have
any other comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.